Phone Support Increases Screening Rates Among Low-Income Women A strategy for promoting cancer screening among low-income women through telephone calls offering encouragement and logistical support has been effective in New York City, and some Medicaid Managed Care Centers are planning to test the approach this summer. The strategy uses trained counselors to contact by telephone women who are overdue to be screened for breast, cervical, or colon cancer. Women in underserved communities have low screening rates, and screening is one way to prevent deaths from these cancers. In a randomized clinical trial to test the intervention, researchers found that women who received the telephone support - four phone calls on average - had higher screening rates than women who received the standard care of a phone call and a pamphlet. Read more Finding New and Valuable Research Partners That cancer is an immensely complex disease is not a new observation. It has the remarkable capacity to persist silently until it has advanced to a state of imminent lethality; to withstand powerful cytotoxic therapies; and to co-opt other tissue cytokines from the tumor microenvironment in order to proliferate, invade, and metastasize. It's no wonder, then, that researchers using novel high-throughput technologies to delve further and further into the molecular machinery of tumors and their micro- and macro-environments are confronting serious issues with regard to managing and mining their research data. At this level of complexity, when researchers are, for instance, attempting to tease out from their data patterns of molecular behavior among many competing and cooperating genes, proteins, and cell signaling pathways, they are increasingly in need of new, advanced mathematical tools and a team approach. Read more
|
Phone Support Increases Screening Rates Among Low-Income Women A strategy for promoting cancer screening among low-income women through telephone calls offering encouragement and logistical support has been effective in New York City, and some Medicaid Managed Care Centers are planning to test the approach this summer. The strategy uses trained counselors to contact by telephone women who are overdue to be screened for breast, cervical, or colon cancer. Women in underserved communities have low screening rates, and screening is one way to prevent deaths from these cancers. In a randomized clinical trial to test the intervention, researchers found that women who received the telephone support - four phone calls on average - had higher screening rates than women who received the standard care of a phone call and a pamphlet. The most dramatic result was a nearly 25-percentage point increase in colon cancer screening among the intervention group during the 18-month trial, the researchers report in the April 18 Annals of Internal Medicine. "We were able to improve rates of cancer screening among women served by community health centers through a practical and reproducible intervention," says lead researcher Dr. Allen Dietrich of the Norris Cotton Cancer Center at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Telephone support is an idea that can easily be adopted around the country, he adds, and many organizations are now running telephone disease-management programs. One such organization is Medicaid. In the next phase of the NCI-funded project, Dr. Dietrich will test the intervention at Medicaid Managed Care Centers. According to the plan, staffers at the care centers will use billing records to identify women who are behind on their screening and who should be contacted by telephone. The programs will be guided by lessons learned from the trial in New York City. The trial involved 1,400 women who were recruited from 11 community clinics or migrant health centers. About 60 percent of the women spoke Spanish, and of the participants who reported their race, 38 percent said they were African American. In the trial, screening rates in the intervention group rose 7 percentage points for Pap tests (from 71 percent to 78 percent); 10 points for mammography (from 58 percent to 68 percent); and 24 points for colon cancer screening (from 39 percent to 63 percent). The rates for Pap tests and mammography at the 11 clinics were "quite good" before the trial started, notes Dr. Dietrich, adding, "We were gratified that a modest intervention could improve the rates." The large increase for colon cancer testing is important, he says, because screening for this cancer has lagged behind that of cervical and breast cancer. The rise in colon cancer screening alone might be worth the cost of the intervention, says Dr. Mary Barton of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, who wrote an accompanying editorial. She points out that the intervention, in addition to being multilingual and culturally appropriate, encouraged women to raise the issue of screening with their doctors rather than wait for the doctors to raise it. Women who could not easily communicate with their doctors were given brightly colored cards listing the tests for which they were overdue that could be shared with their doctors at the next visit. "The health coaches were saying to the women, 'You bring it up,'" says Dr. Barton. "This is one of the most interesting and potentially most effective aspects of the intervention." By Edward R. Winstead |
Finding New and Valuable Research Partners That cancer is an immensely complex disease is not a new observation. It has the remarkable capacity to persist silently until it has advanced to a state of imminent lethality; to withstand powerful cytotoxic therapies; and to co-opt other tissue cytokines from the tumor microenvironment in order to proliferate, invade, and metastasize. It's no wonder, then, that researchers using novel high-throughput technologies to delve further and further into the molecular machinery of tumors and their micro- and macro-environments are confronting serious issues with regard to managing and mining their research data. At this level of complexity, when researchers are, for instance, attempting to tease out from their data patterns of molecular behavior among many competing and cooperating genes, proteins, and cell signaling pathways, they are increasingly in need of new, advanced mathematical tools and a team approach. A new program just getting off the ground at the NCI Center for Cancer Research (CCR) is attempting to help bridge this gap in what is called integrative systems biology. Led by Drs. David Levens and James McNally, the program will enlist the assistance of representatives from the University of Maryland's world-renowned physics and math departments to help CCR researchers find solutions to some of their most pressing computational biology challenges. Like many advances in science, serendipity played a role in the emergence of this program. Dr. Levens had several conversations with his neighbor - Dr. Drew Baden, associate chair of the physics department at Maryland - about the sorts of problems he and others at CCR were facing in analyzing massive biological data sets. At the same time, Dr. McNally had been working with a mathematician, Dr. Bob Pego, in the University's Institute for Physical Sciences and Technology. From these interactions came the realization that the computational tools used by mathematicians and physicists, who often deal with studies involving trillions of data points, could be of assistance to CCR researchers. The concept they developed - in concert with two others at the University of Maryland, Drs. Wolfgang Losert and Eitan Tadmor - was to find a simple way to link CCR investigators with computational and informational obstacles to the school's math and physics departments' faculty, graduate students, or advanced undergraduate students to gain assistance. CCR investigators and university faculty and students held a workshop just a few weeks ago at which CCR investigators discussed the type of computational and systems biology challenges they are facing. The Maryland representatives, in turn, offered some thoughts regarding the type of solutions they might be able to provide. The program itself will, initially at least, use an Internet-based tool to connect CCR investigators with participating Maryland faculty and students. Although this program in computational and systems biology is still in its formative stages, I believe it offers a number of lessons and opportunities for the entire cancer community. First, it is a demonstration that the rigorous application of physical principles to biological questions is becoming more and more possible. Second, it highlights the crosscutting nature of science and the fact that our efforts to make new and important advances against cancer will rely on collaboration with those outside the typical sphere of biomedical research. Finally, this program provides a model for interactions between cancer researchers and researchers from other scientific disciplines at nearby universities whose expertise they may be able to tap. Dr. John E. Niederhuber |
EVS: Definitively Describing Science No one doubts that 21st century biomedicine is undergoing profound change, as new disciplines, technologies, and paradigms emerge. One new discipline that may transform how science is done is bioinformatics, which uses the latest tools, information technologies, and analytical methods designed to manage the large volumes of data generated from research in the areas of molecular biology, digital imaging, proteomics, and genomics.
While it has been said that mathematics is the language of science, perhaps the most essential piece of the bioinformatics puzzle is the choice of words used to describe what is being communicated. At NCI, this terminology is collected, created, combined, and controlled via its Enterprise Vocabulary Services (EVS). NCI has taken the lead in the development of these tools to facilitate cancer research. "Cancer researchers have always needed to organize and report their results in a way that others can find, build upon, and relate to the specific clinical conditions of individual patients," said Larry Wright, a co-director of EVS. "What makes this especially urgent now is the dramatic increase in knowledge at the biological, cellular, and molecular levels." Moreover, says one of EVS' prime architects, Dr. Nicholas Sioutos, "the growing flood of new information on tumors, patients, therapies, and techniques is increasingly beyond what clinicians and researchers can handle with traditional approaches. We clearly needed a systematic, approved way of describing things - in other words, a muscular yet flexible reference terminology." EVS was launched in 1997, followed by the NCI Thesaurus (NCIt), developed to help track and analyze terminology used in NCI-funded cancer research. Nine years later, NCIt has evolved into a powerful biomedical ontology - describing the properties and relationships of concepts encountered in the domain of oncology - that is used far beyond NCI. In conjunction with the NCI Metathesaurus, another EVS tool, NCIt provides users with a standardized vocabulary and, thus, a way to search all linked data reliably, unambiguously, and comprehensively. Both terminology reference tools are becoming widely used in the national and international cancer biomedical communities. Other parts of the federal government, faced with comparable challenges, also have been working on terminology development and standards. The last decade has seen a number of terminologies develop in other countries and contexts, such as biotechnology. The characteristics of cyberspace are being coupled with innovative ways of conducting science, and enormous batches of raw data are being generated with the new tools and technologies. As a result, the cyberinfrastructure challenge now has global proportions. One of many long-term needs that likely depends on meeting this challenge is the development of electronic national health records. Another is the systematic collection and analysis of clinical trial results, the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. In the United States, NCI's Physician Data Query cancer information database uses NCIt to help code its online registry of cancer clinical trials for search and retrieval, and to develop and code its evidence-based cancer information summaries. EVS is jointly operated by the Office of Communications and the NCI Center for Bioinformatics (NCICB), where another EVS co-director, Dr. Frank Hartel, pulls no punches: "We're hoping to change the basic culture of research using information technology." Historically, scientists have consulted the published biomedical literature, and have adapted and translated what they discover there for their own purposes. Moreover, they generally have not had access to unpublished data. "But experimental data are very expensive to create," says Dr. Hartel, referring to the high cost of mounting basic and clinical studies, "and we can do much better than we have at leveraging the results." When the data come into a publicly accessible database under NCIt or the Metathesaurus, says Dr. Hartel, their potential value in terms of usability is greater because of the applied semantics. "The combination of controlled terminology and the conceptual framework provides a description that will be easily understood - and can be relied on - by other people who later need to evaluate the data's significance." The system also doesn't discriminate against data that wasn't published. "We package and tag the data according to a well-designed intellectual framework, which is continually being revised and refined based on feedback from our users," said Dr. Hartel. "Every day, hundreds of users are engaged in data retrieval and classification across a wide range of working contexts. If it's not working, the users let us know that enhancements or corrections are needed to reflect the needs of working scientists." The NCI Metathesaurus provides another way to synchronize NCIt with the larger scientific community by crossmapping terms in NCIt to those from other biomedical terminologies, at last count totaling more than 50. EVS developers also update the growing Metathesaurus each month. Currently, there are more than 2.5 million terms with which a user can begin a query. Not only are the terms able to be crossreferenced to show equivalence (for example, "imatinib mesylate" is also referred to as Gleevec, STI-571, and other terms), but they also are nested within some 1.1 million larger concepts and 5 million relationships. The EVS products are open source and configured for users to download and access using public application programming interfaces. NCIt can be obtained under an open-content license. All related tools can be found on the EVS Web site. By Addison Greenwood |
Understanding the Effects of Emerging Cellular, Molecular, and Genomic Technologies on Cancer Health Care Delivery Announcement Number: PA-06-281 New Application Receipt Dates: June 1 and Oct. 1, 2006; Feb. 1, June 1, and Oct. 1, 2007; Feb. 1, June 1, and Oct. 1, 2008; Feb. 1, 2009. This funding opportunity will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3398. Inquiries: Dr. Louise Wideroff - wideroff@nih.gov Stem Cells and Cancer This is a renewal of PA-05-086 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3399. Inquiries: Dr. R. Allan Mufson - am214t@nih.gov Diet-Induced Changes in Inflammation as Determinants of Colon Cancer This is a renewal of PA-05-125 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3400. Inquiries: Dr. Young S. Kim - yk47s@nih.gov |
Targeted Treatment for Recurrent or Progressive Lung Cancer
Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Patients with Recurrent or Progressive Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NCI-05-C-0049). See the protocol summary at http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/NCI-05-C-0049. This trial was originally featured in the October 18, 2005, issue of the NCI Cancer Bulletin. Principal Investigator Why This Trial Is Important In this clinical trial, researchers are testing a new drug called sorafenib to see if it can cause tumors to shrink or disappear in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has recurred or progressed after previous treatment with chemotherapy. Sorafenib inhibits a protein called Raf kinase, which helps promote cell proliferation. Blocking Raf kinase activity may halt the spread of cancer cells. Sorafenib also inhibits two other proteins named vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 2 and 3 (VEGFR2 and VEGFR3), which help tumors form new blood vessels (a process called angiogenesis). By blocking VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 activity, sorafenib may help cut off the blood supply to tumors and cause them to die. "Sorafenib is a molecularly targeted oral medication with both antiproliferative and antiangiogenic properties," said Dr. Gutierrez. "It has shown some promising results against NSCLC in an earlier phase I study, and it appears to be well tolerated. Most of the toxicity that we have seen has been mild and easy to control." Who Can Join This Trial Study Site and Contact Information An archive of "Featured Clinical Trial" columns is available at http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/ft-all-featured-trials. |
On April 25, CancerCare, in collaboration with NCI, the Lance Armstrong Foundation, the Intercultural Cancer Council, Living Beyond Breast Cancer, and the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, presented the first of a free three-part telephone education workshop series, "Cancer Survivorship: Living With, Through, and Beyond Cancer." Part I of the series, which was held the same day, provided "Stress Management Tips for Survivors." The dial-in number to listen to the program is 1-800-625-5288, access code 843404. It will run 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for at least the next year, and the speakers' presentations will be relevant for a year or more. Part II, "Is It My Cancer or Am I Getting Older?" will take place on May 23; and Part III, "Managing Your Costs of Recovery," is scheduled for June 20. No phone charges apply, but preregistration is required. To register or to access an archived workshop, go to http://www.cancercare.org/TEW. Symposium to Highlight Health Communication Research The symposium is free; no registration is necessary. For more information, contact Dr. Linda Harris at 301-451-9477 or harrisl@mail.nih.gov. NCI Observes National Women's Health Week Information about treatment, prevention, genetics, screening, clinical trials, literature, research, and statistics for cancers that occur mainly in women can be found at http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/womenscancers. Highlights of NCI-supported research to understand, prevent, diagnose, and treat cancers in women is available at http://women.cancer.gov. Information about other federal, state, regional, and local planned events celebrating National Women's Health Week can be found at http://www.4woman.gov/ HINTS Data Available for Public Use |
What strategic partnerships have expanded the reach of EVS? Perhaps our most visible and constant partnership is with the NCI-designated Cancer Centers and other participants in the caBIG™ network. We've partnered with NLM to create and extend the PubMed Cancer Subset and with the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium to develop standard terminology for clinical trial data. We are also working with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, providing terminology support for their effort to model electronic health data reporting for cancer registries. It sounds like a fast-growing enterprise; where do you expect to go in the future? |

"We're at a crossroads," says Dr. Ken Buetow, project director for the cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid™ (caBIG™). "Our success will depend on the cyberinfrastructure that we develop to manage these challenges."
What's it like to keep a vast system like EVS functioning?