Brain Cancer Study Supports Fluorescence-Guided Surgery An experimental surgery for brain cancer in which patients take a drug that causes tumor tissue to appear fluorescent during an operation seemed to be superior to conventional surgery in a randomized clinical trial. The multicenter phase III trial, in Germany, involved 270 patients treated for malignant glioma, the most common brain cancer. Patients who took the drug were more likely to have their tumors removed completely and to be free of disease 6 months after the procedure than patients who had conventional microsurgery with white light. Read more 1 Cancer Center Directors Ready to Take on Greater Leadership Role Last week, NCI's senior leadership hosted our semi-annual meeting in Washington, D.C., of the directors of all NCI-designated Cancer Centers. This was the fourth such meeting with NCI, a dialogue I began during my presidency of the Association of American Cancer Institutes. As with the previous meetings, its goal was to encourage frank discussions and gain honest input from the directors on some of the most pressing issues facing NCI - a dialogue never more important than in this period of decreasing NCI budgets. Every aspect of the Center Directors' mission - from core grant support to Center members' R01s - is feeling the pressure of few dollars. At the meeting, members of a special Cancer Center Directors' Working Group, led by Dr. John Mendelsohn from the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, presented draft reports on their recommendations on how the Centers can help NCI reduce the cancer burden by identifying achievable goals and specific milestones, and by defining the opportunities and potential barriers to achieving our goals. They also presented ideas on ways in which the Centers can extend their research beyond their local communities; provide leadership in the wide dissemination of best practices in cancer care and prevention; and develop innovative ways to work in a collaborative, multidisciplinary way on key opportunities in integrating biology. I am confident that this document will become a vital implementation plan to achieve our promise to our patients. Read more 2
|
Brain Cancer Study Supports Fluorescence-Guided Surgery An experimental surgery for brain cancer in which patients take a drug that causes tumor tissue to appear fluorescent during an operation seemed to be superior to conventional surgery in a randomized clinical trial. The multicenter phase III trial, in Germany, involved 270 patients treated for malignant glioma, the most common brain cancer. Patients who took the drug were more likely to have their tumors removed completely and to be free of disease 6 months after the procedure than patients who had conventional microsurgery with white light. The drug is a natural compound called 5-aminolevulinic acid. When taken about 3 hours before surgery, it induces the synthesis of fluorescent molecules in cancerous tissue, which can be seen by surgeons through special operating microscopes. Some previous studies have suggested that treatments for malignant glioma are most effective when all or most of the cancer has been surgically removed. The trial tested the idea that fluorescence can help guide surgeons during the difficult task of trying to identify and remove the abnormal areas without harming the healthy brain. The borders between these tissues are often unclear. The researchers say that surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid is "easy to do and does not interrupt the operation." "We are using the approach in all our patients undergoing surgery for malignant gliomas in a compassionate use program," says Dr. Walter Stummer of the Heinrich-Heine University in Düsseldorf, who led the trial. The trial was stopped early after an interim analysis of the results clearly favored the experimental group. It is not yet known, however, whether patients who have the experimental surgery live longer than other patients. According to findings published in the May Lancet Oncology, tumors were completely removed in 65 percent of the experimental group and 36 percent of conventional group. Side effects after surgery were similar between the two groups a week after surgery. The experimental strategy was associated with a clinical benefit. After 6 months, 41 percent of the experimental group had not relapsed, compared with 21 percent in the conventional group. An editorial accompanying the results observes that many tools have been developed to improve the outcomes of surgeries for this disease, but few have been tested in prospective clinical trials. The trial "is a step forward in the study of surgery for malignant glioma," write Drs. Fred Barker of Massachusetts General Hospital and Susan Chang of the University of California, San Francisco. They caution, however, that the study did not show a significant overall survival benefit. "The best estimate of the overall survival benefit was modest - about 1.7 months," says Dr. Barker. For reasons that are not yet clear, the results show a strong correlation between the complete removal of tumors and a patient's age and performance on tests. Patients older than age 55 seemed to benefit more than younger patients. "I found it interesting that patients in the experimental group had fewer repeat surgeries but tended to survive longer," says Dr. Stummer. This demonstrates how much "patients profit from simply having better surgery at the beginning of therapy." For patients with malignant glioma, he continues, the goal should be the complete surgical removal of tumors. "Surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid is a modern, simple, cost-effective, and safe way of achieving this goal," he says. By Edward R. Winstead |
Cancer Center Directors Ready to Take on Greater Leadership Role Last week, NCI's senior leadership hosted our semi-annual meeting in Washington, D.C., of the directors of all NCI-designated Cancer Centers. This was the fourth such meeting with NCI, a dialogue I began during my presidency of the Association of American Cancer Institutes. As with the previous meetings, its goal was to encourage frank discussions and gain honest input from the directors on some of the most pressing issues facing NCI - a dialogue never more important than in this period of decreasing NCI budgets. Every aspect of the Center Directors' mission - from core grant support to Center members' R01s - is feeling the pressure of few dollars.
Their input couldn't have been more timely as NCI faces difficult fiscal decisions. We must all work together with the broad cancer community in making key resource allocation decisions and the Cancer Centers are the cornerstone of our National Cancer Program. They are where the majority of our grantees reside. Institutions with NCI-designated Cancer Centers receive over 60 percent of NCI grant dollars. So the input of the directors as leaders at their institutions is important to us all. They appreciated the message presented by NIH Director Dr. Elias Zerhouni about the current political and budgetary environment driving the NIH budget process. He told them of the cancer community's unique opportunity to be the first to propose a new vision of how to render cancer care that will resonate with both policy makers and the public. (For more details, please see Dr. Zerhouni's Guest Commentary 3.) As Dr. Mendelsohn noted, the Cancer Centers are offering to play expanded leadership and coordination roles in reducing the cancer burden nationwide. This critical consensus regarding our joint responsibilities will complement NCI's mission to focus on supporting cancer research. The Cancer Centers' mission as an extension of NCI into the community encompasses both research and patient care. The Centers are the site of translation. With increased restraints on the federal budget, we need to leverage our current investments to increase research outcomes - and the Cancer Centers are the lynchpin in this process with their strong public-private partnerships and involvement with the philanthropic community. The Cancer Centers also share NCI's commitment to better manage the nation's cancer research dollars over a longer period of time than is possible with a focus on the yearly federal budget cycle. This means developing 5-year plans using NCI's strategic plan, while keeping the investigator-initiated research pool strong to incorporate new ideas, scientific developments, and technology advances. It also means protecting our future talent pipeline via mechanisms that provide enhanced support for new investigators, such as NIH's new "Pathway To Independence" awards. The Center Directors' collective experience and unabated commitment to their institutions and the communities they serve, as well as to the highest quality research and patient care, makes their readiness to assume a greater leadership role a dramatic and significant milestone in NCI's mission to lessen the burden of cancer for the American people. I know I speak for the entire NCI senior leadership team when I say we are extremely fortunate to have such a well-established, nationwide program as part of the National Cancer Institute. We all recognize just how much we owe those who came before us - those who had the wisdom and vision to create the national Cancer Centers' Program. They have deeded to all of us a tremendous responsibility to continue to build on their foundation. Dr. John E. Niederhuber |
The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship - Changing the Lexicon of Cancer "Every day, approximately 4,000 Americans become survivors when they hear the words, 'You have cancer,'" says Ellen Stovall, president and CEO of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship 4 (NCCS), a survivor-led advocacy organization that targets change at the federal level. "Twenty years ago the founders of NCCS selected the term 'survivor' to describe those living with, through, and beyond cancer. But the term is not reserved only for those of us who have been diagnosed with the disease," Ms. Stovall continues. "It includes all those who support the person with cancer: families, friends, and caregivers. By sharing the burden that cancer places on each of us, we're able to move beyond the diagnosis and focus on living meaningful, productive lives despite it." Ms. Stovall should know. After surviving two bouts of Hodgkin lymphoma - the first of which was diagnosed at stage IV only 6 weeks after she had become a new mother - and now leading this advocacy organization for the past 14 years, she's seen firsthand how partnership in the cancer community can make a significant difference in patients' access to quality cancer care. This year marks the 20th anniversary for NCCS. To celebrate the occasion, the coalition paid tribute to 20 individuals at an awards gala held April 26 in Washington, D.C., where they were recognized as Rays of Hope.
"It's a deeply humbling privilege to be among such an august group of people," says Dr. Rowland, who began working with NCCS shortly after it was founded, when she was the director of a post-treatment resource program that she started for patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. "NCCS realized long ago that by talking about survivorship from the day of diagnosis, not only would this give patients, caregivers, and family members hope, but it would force the medical establishment to address quality-of-life issues for patients undergoing treatment." NCCS is credited with numerous other changes, many of which have been made at the federal level. For example, the founding chair, Barbara Hoffman - herself a cancer survivor and lawyer who was concerned with issues of discrimination against patients with cancer - helped write the Americans for Disabilities Act in 1990. NCCS later contributed to the Medicare Cancer Coverage Improvement Act of 1993 and the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996, and was credited with President Clinton's executive memorandum in 2000 that guaranteed routine patient care costs coverage for Medicare beneficiaries who enroll in clinical trials. And at NCI, the Office of Cancer Survivorship that Dr. Rowland now leads was created in 1996 after then-director Dr. Richard Klausner read the NCCS report, Imperatives for Quality Cancer Care: Access, Advocacy, Action and Accountability 5. To increase the effectiveness of cancer survivors in addressing national issues, in 2004 NCCS launched Cancer Advocacy Now!™, a grassroots network that trains survivors in legislative advocacy and provides them with Web-based forums where they can describe how cancer has affected their lives and how they have coped with it. "I feel so fortunate to have found a cause and an organization that have truly given me my life's work," says Ms. Stovall. "I learned about NCCS while I was dealing with my second diagnosis of Hodgkin's disease and a good deal of uncertainty about my long-term prognosis. I picked up an NCCS newsletter in my doctor's office and remember vividly the tagline at the top of page, which read, 'From the moment of diagnosis and for the balance of life, an individual diagnosed with cancer is a SURVIVOR.' From that day on, I was hooked on the organization and the incredibly wonderful people who, to this very day, continue to dedicate themselves to NCCS and its mission to advocate for quality cancer care for all." By Brittany Moya del Pino |
Immunoregulation of Gastrointestinal Carcinogenesis Announcement Number: PA-06-289 New Application Receipt Dates: June 1 and Oct. 1, 2006; Feb. 1, June 1, and Oct. 1, 2007; Feb. 1, June 1, and Oct. 1, 2008; Feb. 1, 2009. This funding opportunity will use the R01 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3401. Inquiries: Dr. Kevin Howcroft - howcrofk@mail.nih.gov Immunoregulation of Gastrointestinal Carcinogenesis This funding opportunity will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3402. Inquiries: Dr. Kevin Howcroft - howcrofk@mail.nih.gov Research on the Economics of Diet, Activity, and Energy Balance This is a renewal of PA-05-009 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3406. Inquiries: Dr. Martin L. Brown - mb53o@nih.gov Quick-Trials for Imaging and Image-Guided Interventions: Exploratory Grants This is a renewal of PAR-05-114 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3404. Inquiries: Dr. Lalitha K. Shankar - shankarl@mail.nih.gov; Dr. Keyvan Farahani - farahank@mail.nih.gov Exploratory Grants for Behavioral Research in Cancer Control This is a renewal of PA-04-034 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3429. Inquiries: Dr. Sabra F. Woolley - sw215x@nih.gov Decision Making in Health: Behavior Maintenance This is a renewal of PA-05-016 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3424. Inquiries: Dr. Wendy Nelson - nelsonw@mail.nih.gov Research on Malignancies in AIDS and Acquired Immune Suppression This is a renewal of PA-04-157 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3425. Inquiries: Dr. Elizabeth Read-Connole - bconnole@mail.nih.gov The Effect of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination/Bias on Health Care Delivery This is a renewal of PA-05-006 and will use the R03 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3426. Inquiries: Dr. Vickie L. Shavers - haversv@mail.nih.gov Memory T Lymphocytes in Cancer Immunology This funding opportunity will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3427. Inquiries: Dr. Susan A. McCarthy - mccarths@mail.nih.gov Memory T Lymphocytes in Cancer Immunology This funding opportunity will use the R01 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3428. Inquiries: Dr. Susan A. McCarthy - mccarths@mail.nih.gov Testing Tobacco Products Promoted to Reduce Harm This is a renewal of PA-04-103 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3435. Inquiries: Dr. Mirjana V. Djordjevic - djordjev@mail.nih.gov; Dr. Mark Parascandola - paramark@mail.nih.gov Methodology and Measurement in the Behavioral and Social Sciences This is a renewal of PA-05-090 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3430. Inquiries: Dr. Bryce B. Reeve - reeveb@mail.nih.gov Methodology and Measurement in the Behavioral and Social Sciences This is a renewal of PA-05-090 and will use the R03 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3432. Inquiries: Dr. Bryce B. Reeve - reeveb@mail.nih.gov Exfoliated Cells, Bioactive Food Components, and Cancer This is a renewal of PA-04-114 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3433. Inquiries: Dr. Cindy D. Davis - davisci@mail.nih.gov; Dr. Virginia W. Hartmuller - hartmulv@mail.nih.gov Exfoliated Cells, Bioactive Food Components, and Cancer This is a renewal of PA-04-114 and will use the R03 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3434. Inquiries: Dr. Cindy D. Davis - davisci@mail.nih.gov; Dr. Virginia W. Hartmuller - hartmulv@mail.nih.gov Research on Ethical Issues in Human Subjects Research This is a renewal of PA-02-103 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3438. Inquiries: Kim Witherspoon - withersk@ctep.nci.nih.gov Research on Ethical Issues in Human Subjects Research This funding opportunity will use the R03 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3436. Inquiries: Kim Witherspoon - withersk@ctep.nci.nih.gov Research on Ethical Issues in Human Subjects Research This funding opportunity will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3437. Inquiries: Kim Witherspoon - withersk@ctep.nci.nih.gov Innovations in Cancer Sample Preparation This is a renewal of RFA-CA-07-003 and will use the R21 and R33 award mechanisms. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3451. Inquiries: Dr. Gregory J. Downing - downingg@mail.nih.gov Basic and Translational Research in Emotion This is a renewal of PA-03-169 and will use the R01 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3440. Inquiries: Dr. Kevin Quinn - kquinn@mail.nih.gov Cancer Prevention, Control, Behavioral, and Population Sciences Career Development Award This is a renewal of PAR-04-055 and will use the K07 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3441. Inquiries: Dr. Lester S. Gorelic - gorelicl@mail.nih.gov Innovative Technologies for Molecular Analysis of Cancer This is a renewal of RFA-CA-07-001 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3442. Inquiries: Dr. Gregory J. Downing - downingg@mail.nih.gov Innovative Technologies for Molecular Analysis of Cancer This is a renewal of RFA-CA-07-001 and will use the R33 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3443. Inquiries: Dr. Gregory J. Downing - downingg@mail.nih.gov Application of Emerging Technologies for Cancer Research This is a renewal of RFA-CA-07-002 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3444. Inquiries: Dr. Gregory J. Downing - downingg@mail.nih.gov Application of Emerging Technologies for Cancer Research This is a renewal of RFA-CA-07-002 and will use the R33 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3445. Inquiries: Dr. Gregory J. Downing - downingg@mail.nih.gov Application of Emerging Technologies for Cancer Research This is a renewal of RFA-CA-07-002 and will use the R21 and R33 award mechanisms. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3446. Inquiries: Dr. Gregory J. Downing - downingg@mail.nih.gov Innovations in Cancer Sample Preparation This is a renewal of RFA-CA-07-003 and will use the R21 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3447. Inquiries: Dr. Gregory J. Downing - downingg@mail.nih.gov Innovations in Cancer Sample Preparation This is a renewal of RFA-CA-07-003 and will use the R33 award mechanism. For more information, see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=3448. Inquiries: Dr. Gregory J. Downing - downingg@mail.nih.gov |
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Name of the Trial
Why This Trial Is Important Presurgical treatment with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, known as neoadjuvant therapy, may help prevent cancer recurrence in the region around rectal tumors. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy has been shown to reduce the size of rectal tumors before surgery, and it may allow more patients to undergo sphincter-saving procedures. Preserving sphincter function without increasing the risk of local or regional recurrence is an important consideration in the treatment of rectal cancer. To be eligible for this trial, patients must have rectal tumors that can be completely removed by surgery. They will be treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy at the same time for 5 to 6 weeks before surgery. They will be divided into four groups based on the type of chemotherapy administered: intravenous (IV) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone, IV 5-FU plus IV oxaliplatin, oral capecitabine alone, and oral capecitabine plus IV oxaliplatin. "We hope to improve neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer with the use of oral capecitabine and addition of oxaliplatin and, through the collection of tissue samples, learn how to identify those patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant therapy," said Dr. Beart. Who Can Join This Trial Study Sites and Contact Information An archive of "Featured Clinical Trial" columns is available at http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/ft-all-featured-trials. |
Dr. Udey has served the CCR community in a wide range of positions, including his current work as a member of the Institute Tenure Committee, the Protocol Review and Monitoring Committee, and the Immunology Faculty Steering Committee. He has also served on the Promotion and Tenure Review Committee and the Intramural Advisory Board. Wu Elected to NAS
McMahon to Speak on Translational Research Tobacco Control Conference Slated for June This conference is intended for researchers interested in tobacco prevention, cessation, and control; health care professionals; health care system professionals; health policy experts; public health practitioners; and interested members of the public. The conference is free, but registration is required. For additional information, go to http://consensus.nih.gov/2006/2006TobaccoSOS029html.htm. |
NIH Budget - Myths, Realities, and Strategies
Support for NIH's mission remains strong across the nation and among members of the U.S. Congress. But we are in the midst of a difficult transition period as the federal government grapples with emerging priorities involving the national defense, homeland security, the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and costly - albeit necessary - preparations in anticipation of a pandemic influenza outbreak. We are also dealing with an unprecedented increase in the number of grant applicants and applications due to the massive capacity-building among U.S. research institutions over the past few years. For example, NIH received as many additional new grant applications (8,359) in the last 2 years as there were during the preceding 5-year period (8,302). Essentially, the demand for grants took off just as the NIH budget was landing after years of tremendous growth. The NIH community must meet these new challenges with adaptive planning that allows us to continue pursuing new discoveries with vigor and vision. We have been planning over a considerable period of time for how best to manage our resources in this period of flattening funding scenarios that followed the extraordinary doubling of the NIH budget from 1998 to 2003. I am confident that the measures NIH has taken will help preserve the great momentum we have witnessed in cancer research. For example, NIH has been proactive in managing these challenges by launching programs for new investigators to maximally preserve their opportunities for funding. In addition, despite a flat budget, our FY 2007 plans call for increasing the number of available new and competing awards by about 3 percent. As a responsible steward of NIH funds, Congress is appropriately asking for assurances that its investment in medical research is a wise choice. Fortunately, we have a very impressive case to make. Discoveries fueled by NIH support are transforming the practice of medicine. We can now clearly envision an era when the treatment paradigm of medical care will change to become increasingly more predictive, personalized, and preemptive. We will identify disease before symptoms appear, tailor therapy to the individual, and strike disease before it strikes, thus increasing the likelihood that overall costs to society may be reduced. That is my message to House and Senate committees this year - a message that is proving to be very effective. Legislators are surprised and gratified to learn that the cumulative costs of funding the fight against cancer over the past 30 years total a mere $260 per American, or about $9 per year. The return on that investment has been strong: Mortality rates for cancer have been falling for several years; and NCI has stimulated development of more effective and targeted therapies, increases in early detection and treatment of cancer, and the initiation of truly transformative research. The public health impact of the cancer community's efforts has been tremendous. It is especially important now to educate the public at the local, regional, and national levels about the critical role the nation's investment in biomedical research is playing in improving the health of Americans. Great communities are not defined during times of sunny weather, but by their response during the inevitable stormy times. I trust that the cancer community will remain strong in carrying out its vision to transform how we will prevent, detect, or treat cancer, and render optimal cancer care in the future. Dr. Elias A. Zerhouni |
Table of Links | |
| 1 | http://www.cancer.gov/ncicancerbulletin/NCI_Cancer_Bulletin_050906/page2 |
| 2 | http://www.cancer.gov/ncicancerbulletin/NCI_Cancer_Bulletin_050906/page3 |
| 3 | http://www.cancer.gov/ncicancerbulletin/NCI_Cancer_Bulletin_050906/page9 |
| 4 | http://www.canceradvocacy.org |
| 5 | http://www.canceradvocacy.org/advocacy/intro/imperatives.aspx |

At the meeting, members of a special Cancer Center Directors' Working Group, led by Dr. John Mendelsohn from the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, presented draft reports on their recommendations on how the Centers can help NCI reduce the cancer burden by identifying achievable goals and specific milestones, and by defining the opportunities and potential barriers to achieving our goals. They also presented ideas on ways in which the Centers can extend their research beyond their local communities; provide leadership in the wide dissemination of best practices in cancer care and prevention; and develop innovative ways to work in a collaborative, multidisciplinary way on key opportunities in integrating biology. I am confident that this document will become a vital implementation plan to achieve our promise to our patients.
Among the awardees was NCI's Dr. Julia Rowland, who directs the Office of Cancer Survivorship in the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences. "We honored Dr. Rowland as one of NCCS's Rays of Hope for her outstanding accomplishments as a scientist, clinician, and her long-standing dedication as an ardent advocate for quality behavioral and psychosocial research," explains Ms. Stovall.
Principal Investigator
NCI Annual Report Available
Dr. Wu obtained his Ph.D. in 1979 and conducted postdoctoral research at Harvard University. In 1982, he joined NCI's Laboratory of Biochemistry. He was appointed chief of the Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology in 1996. Dr. Wu received the 1987 Outstanding Young Scientist Award from the Maryland Academy of Sciences and the 1992 Young Investigator Award from the American Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1998.
I was delighted to be able to address the leaders of NCI and the Comprehensive Cancer Centers at their retreat on May 2 (see