In English | En español
Questions About Cancer? 1-800-4-CANCER

Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Treatment (PDQ®)

  • Last Modified: 07/03/2014

Page Options

  • Print This Page
  • Print This Document
  • View Entire Document
  • Email This Document

Primary Myelofibrosis

Disease Overview
Treatment Overview
Current Clinical Trials



Disease Overview

Primary myelofibrosis (also known as agnogenic myeloid metaplasia, chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis, myelosclerosis with myeloid metaplasia, and idiopathic myelofibrosis) is characterized by splenomegaly, immature peripheral blood granulocytes and erythrocytes, and teardrop-shaped red blood cells.[1] In its early phase, the disease is characterized by elevated numbers of CD34-positive cells in the marrow, while the later phases involve marrow fibrosis with decreasing CD34 cells in the marrow and a corresponding increase in splenic and liver engorgement with CD34 cells.

As distinguished from chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), primary myelofibrosis usually presents as follows:[2]

  • A white blood cell count smaller than 30,000/mm3.
  • Prominent teardrops on peripheral smear.
  • Normocellular or hypocellular marrow with moderate to marked fibrosis.
  • An absence of the Philadelphia chromosome or the BCR/ABL translocation.
  • Frequent positivity for the JAK2 mutation.

In addition to the clonal proliferation of a multipotent hematopoietic progenitor cell, an event common to all chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, myeloid metaplasia is characterized by colonization of extramedullary sites such as the spleen or liver.[3,4]

Most patients are older than 60 years at diagnosis, and 33% of patients are asymptomatic at presentation. Splenomegaly, sometimes massive, is a characteristic finding.

Symptoms include:

  • Splenic pain.
  • Early satiety.
  • Anemia.
  • Bone pain.
  • Fatigue.
  • Fever.
  • Night sweats.
  • Weight loss.

(Refer to the PDQ summaries on Pain; Fatigue; Hot Flashes and Night Sweats; and Nutrition for information on many of the symptoms listed above.)

The proposed World Health Organization criteria for the diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis requires all three major criteria and two minor criteria.[5]

Major Criteria

  1. Presence of megakaryocyte proliferation and atypia, usually accompanied by either reticulin and/or collagen fibrosis; or, in the absence of significant reticulin fibrosis, the megakaryocyte changes must be accompanied by increased bone marrow cellularity characterized by granulocytic proliferation and often decreased erythropoiesis (so-called prefibrotic cellular-phase disease).
  2. Not meeting criteria for polycythemia vera (p. vera), CML, myelodysplastic syndrome, or other myeloid neoplasm.
  3. Demonstration of JAK2 617V greater than F or other clonal marker; or, in the absence of a clonal marker, no evidence of bone marrow fibrosis caused by an underlying inflammatory disease or another neoplastic disease. About 60% of patients with primary myelofibrosis carry a JAK2 mutation, and about 5% to 10% of the patients have activating mutations in the thrombopoietin receptor gene, MPL. Almost 90% of the patients without JAK2 or MPL carry a somatic mutation of the calreticulin gene, which is associated with a more indolent clinical course than is seen with JAK2 or MPL mutations.[6,7]

Minor Criteria

  1. Leukoerythroblastosis.
  2. Increased serum level of lactate dehydrogenase.
  3. Anemia.
  4. Palpable splenomegaly.

The median survival is 3.5 years to 5.5 years, but patients younger than 55 years have a median survival of 11 years.[3,4] The major causes of death include:[8]

  • Progressive marrow failure.
  • Transformation to acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia.
  • Infection.
  • Thrombohemorrhagic events.
  • Heart failure.
  • Portal hypertension.

Fatal and nonfatal thrombosis was associated with age more than 60 years and JAK2 617V positivity in a multivariable analysis of 707 patients followed from 1973 to 2008.[9] Bone marrow examination including cytogenetic testing may exclude other causes of myelophthisis, such as CML, myelodysplastic syndrome, metastatic cancer, lymphomas, and plasma cell disorders.[4] In acute myelofibrosis, patients present with pancytopenia but no splenomegaly or peripheral blood myelophthisis. Peripheral blood or marrow monocytosis is suggestive for myelodysplasia in this setting.

There is no staging system for this disease.

Prognostic factors include:[10-14]

  • Age 65 years or older.

  • Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL).

  • Constitutional symptoms: fever, night sweats, or weight loss.

  • Leukocytosis (white blood cell count >25 × 109/L).

  • Circulating blasts of at least 1%.

Patients without any of the adverse features, excluding age, have a median survival of more than 10 to 15 years, but the presence of any two of the adverse features lowers the median survival to less than 4 years.[15,16] International prognostic scoring systems incorporate the aforementioned prognostic factors.[15,17]

Karyotype abnormalities can also affect prognosis. In a retrospective series, the 13q and 20q deletions and trisomy 9 correlated with improved survival and no leukemia transformation in comparison with the worse prognosis with trisomy 8, complex karyotype, -7/7q-, i(17q), inv(3), -5/5q-, 12p-, or 11q23 rearrangement.[9,18]

Treatment Overview

Asymptomatic low-risk patients (based on the aforementioned prognostic systems) should be followed with a watchful waiting approach. The development of symptomatic anemia, marked leukocytosis, drenching night sweats, weight loss, fever, or symptomatic splenomegaly would warrant therapeutic intervention.

The profound anemia that develops in this disease usually requires red blood cell transfusion. Red blood cell survival is markedly decreased in some patients; this can sometimes be treated with glucocorticoids. Disease-associated anemia may occasionally respond to the following:[4,19-21]

  • Erythropoietic growth factors. Erythropoietin and darbepoetin are less likely to help when patients are transfusion dependent or manifest a serum erythropoietin level greater than 125 U/L.[22,23]

  • Prednisone (40–80 mg/day).

  • Danazol (600 mg/day).

  • Thalidomide (50 mg/day) ± prednisone.[24] Patients on thalidomide require prophylaxis for avoiding thrombosis and careful monitoring for hematologic toxicity.

  • Lenalidomide (10 mg/day) ± prednisone.[25-27] In the presence of del(5q), lenalidomide with or without prednisone, can reverse anemia and splenomegaly in most patients.[25-27] However, patients on lenalidomide require prophylaxis for avoiding thrombosis and careful monitoring for hematologic toxicity.

  • Pomalidomide.[28] Patients on pomalidomide require prophylaxis for avoiding thrombosis and careful monitoring for hematologic toxicity.

Ruxolitinib, an inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK2, can reduce the splenomegaly and debilitating symptoms of weight loss, fatigue, and night sweats for patients with JAK2-positive or JAK2-negative primary myelofibrosis, post–essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, or post–p. vera myelofibrosis.[29]

In two prospective, randomized trials, 528 higher-risk patients were randomly assigned to ruxolitinib or to either placebo (COMFORT-I [NCT00952289]) or best available therapy (COMFORT-II [NCT00934544]). At 48 weeks, patients on ruxolitinib had a decrease of 30% to 40% in mean spleen volume compared with an increase of 7% to 8% in the control patients.[30][Level of evidence: 1iiDiv]; [31][Level of evidence: 1iDiv] Ruxolitinib also improved overall quality-of-life measures, with low toxic effects in both studies, but with no benefit in overall survival in the initial reports. Additional follow-up in both studies (1 year in COMFORT-I and 2 years in COMFORT-II) showed a survival benefit among ruxolitinib-treated patients compared with control patients (COMFORT-I hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36–0.95; and COMFORT-II HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28–0.85).[32,33][Level of evidence: 1iiA] Clinical benefits were observed across a wide variety of clinical subgroups.[34,35] Discontinuation of ruxolitinib results in a rapid worsening of splenomegaly and the recurrence of systemic symptoms.[30,31,36] Ruxolitinib does not reverse bone marrow fibrosis or induce histologic or cytogenetic remissions. More selective JAK inhibitors are currently being evaluated in clinical trials.[37,38]

Painful splenomegaly can be treated temporarily with ruxolitinib, hydroxyurea, thalidomide, lenalidomide, cladribine, or radiation therapy, but sometimes requires splenectomy.[21,39,40] The decision to perform splenectomy represents a weighing of the benefits (i.e., reduction of symptoms, decreased portal hypertension, and less need for red blood cell transfusions lasting for 1 to 2 years) versus the debits (i.e., postoperative mortality of 10% and morbidity of 30% caused by infection, bleeding, or thrombosis; no benefit for thrombocytopenia; and accelerated progression to the blast-crisis phase that was seen by some investigators but not others).[4,39]

After splenectomy, many physicians use anticoagulation therapy for 4 to 6 weeks to reduce portal vein thrombosis, and hydroxyurea can be utilized to reduce high platelet levels (>1 million).[41] However, data from a retrospective review of 150 patients who underwent surgery provided documentation that 8% of the patients had a thromboembolism and 7% had a major hemorrhage with prior cytoreduction and postoperative subcutaneous heparin used in one-half of the patients.[42]

Hydroxyurea is useful in patients with splenomegaly but may have a potential leukemogenic effect.[4] In patients with thrombocytosis and hepatomegaly after splenectomy, cladribine has shown responses as an alternative to hydroxyurea.[43] The use of interferon-alpha can result in hematologic responses, including reduction in spleen size in 30% to 50% of patients, though many patients do not tolerate this medication.[44,45] Favorable responses to thalidomide and lenalidomide have been reported in about 20% to 60% of patients.[19-21,46-48][Level of evidence: 3iiiDiv]

A response defined as 50% reduction of splenomegaly or development of transfusion independence was attained by one-third of 34 symptomatic patients using tipifarnib.[49][Level of evidence: 3iiiDiv] A more aggressive approach involves allogeneic peripheral stem cell or bone marrow transplantation when a suitable donor is available.[50-55] Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only potentially curative treatment available, but the associated morbidity and mortality limit its use to younger, high-risk patients.[53,56] Detection of the JAK2 mutation after transplantation is associated with a worse prognosis.[57]

Treatment options:

  1. Ruxolitinib.[30,31,36,37]
  2. Clinical trials involving other JAK2 inhibitors.
  3. Hydroxyurea.[3,4]
  4. Allogeneic peripheral stem cell or bone marrow transplantation.[51-55]
  5. Thalidomide.[19,24,46-48,50]
  6. Lenalidomide.[21,25-27,48]
  7. Pomalidomide.[28]
  8. Splenectomy.[39,58]
  9. Splenic radiation therapy or radiation to sites of symptomatic extramedullary hematopoiesis (e.g., large lymph nodes, cord compression).[4]
  10. Cladribine.[43]
  11. Interferon-alpha.[44,45]
Current Clinical Trials

Check for U.S. clinical trials from NCI's list of cancer clinical trials that are now accepting patients with primary myelofibrosis. The list of clinical trials can be further narrowed by location, drug, intervention, and other criteria.

General information about clinical trials is also available from the NCI Web site.

References
  1. Hennessy BT, Thomas DA, Giles FJ, et al.: New approaches in the treatment of myelofibrosis. Cancer 103 (1): 32-43, 2005.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  2. Campbell PJ, Green AR: The myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med 355 (23): 2452-66, 2006.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  3. Barosi G: Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: diagnostic definition and prognostic classification for clinical studies and treatment guidelines. J Clin Oncol 17 (9): 2954-70, 1999.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  4. Tefferi A: Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. N Engl J Med 342 (17): 1255-65, 2000.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  5. Tefferi A, Thiele J, Vardiman JW: The 2008 World Health Organization classification system for myeloproliferative neoplasms: order out of chaos. Cancer 115 (17): 3842-7, 2009.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  6. Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, et al.: Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med 369 (25): 2379-90, 2013.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  7. Nangalia J, Massie CE, Baxter EJ, et al.: Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N Engl J Med 369 (25): 2391-405, 2013.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  8. Chim CS, Kwong YL, Lie AK, et al.: Long-term outcome of 231 patients with essential thrombocythemia: prognostic factors for thrombosis, bleeding, myelofibrosis, and leukemia. Arch Intern Med 165 (22): 2651-8, 2005 Dec 12-26.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  9. Hussein K, Pardanani AD, Van Dyke DL, et al.: International Prognostic Scoring System-independent cytogenetic risk categorization in primary myelofibrosis. Blood 115 (3): 496-9, 2010.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  10. Cervantes F, Barosi G, Demory JL, et al.: Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia in young individuals: disease characteristics, prognostic factors and identification of risk groups. Br J Haematol 102 (3): 684-90, 1998.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  11. Strasser-Weippl K, Steurer M, Kees M, et al.: Age and hemoglobin level emerge as most important clinical prognostic parameters in patients with osteomyelofibrosis: introduction of a simplified prognostic score. Leuk Lymphoma 47 (3): 441-50, 2006.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  12. Tefferi A: Survivorship and prognosis in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Leuk Lymphoma 47 (3): 379-80, 2006.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  13. Tam CS, Kantarjian H, Cortes J, et al.: Dynamic model for predicting death within 12 months in patients with primary or post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol 27 (33): 5587-93, 2009.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  14. Morel P, Duhamel A, Hivert B, et al.: Identification during the follow-up of time-dependent prognostic factors for the competing risks of death and blast phase in primary myelofibrosis: a study of 172 patients. Blood 115 (22): 4350-5, 2010.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  15. Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al.: New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood 113 (13): 2895-901, 2009.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  16. Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Jimma T, et al.: One thousand patients with primary myelofibrosis: the mayo clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 87 (1): 25-33, 2012.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  17. Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al.: DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol 29 (4): 392-7, 2011.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  18. Caramazza D, Begna KH, Gangat N, et al.: Refined cytogenetic-risk categorization for overall and leukemia-free survival in primary myelofibrosis: a single center study of 433 patients. Leukemia 25 (1): 82-8, 2011.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  19. Giovanni B, Michelle E, Letizia C, et al.: Thalidomide in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a pooled-analysis of individual patient data from five studies. Leuk Lymphoma 43 (12): 2301-7, 2002.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  20. Marchetti M, Barosi G, Balestri F, et al.: Low-dose thalidomide ameliorates cytopenias and splenomegaly in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 22 (3): 424-31, 2004.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  21. Tefferi A, Cortes J, Verstovsek S, et al.: Lenalidomide therapy in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Blood 108 (4): 1158-64, 2006.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  22. Cervantes F, Alvarez-Larrán A, Hernández-Boluda JC, et al.: Erythropoietin treatment of the anaemia of myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: results in 20 patients and review of the literature. Br J Haematol 127 (4): 399-403, 2004.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  23. Huang J, Tefferi A: Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have limited therapeutic activity in transfusion-dependent patients with primary myelofibrosis regardless of serum erythropoietin level. Eur J Haematol 83 (2): 154-5, 2009.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  24. Thomas DA, Giles FJ, Albitar M, et al.: Thalidomide therapy for myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Cancer 106 (9): 1974-84, 2006.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  25. Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Mesa RA, et al.: Lenalidomide therapy in del(5)(q31)-associated myelofibrosis: cytogenetic and JAK2V617F molecular remissions. Leukemia 21 (8): 1827-8, 2007.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  26. Mesa RA, Yao X, Cripe LD, et al.: Lenalidomide and prednisone for myelofibrosis: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase 2 trial E4903. Blood 116 (22): 4436-8, 2010.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  27. Quintás-Cardama A, Kantarjian HM, Manshouri T, et al.: Lenalidomide plus prednisone results in durable clinical, histopathologic, and molecular responses in patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol 27 (28): 4760-6, 2009.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  28. Begna KH, Mesa RA, Pardanani A, et al.: A phase-2 trial of low-dose pomalidomide in myelofibrosis. Leukemia 25 (2): 301-4, 2011.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  29. Verstovsek S, Kantarjian H, Mesa RA, et al.: Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 363 (12): 1117-27, 2010.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  30. Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, et al.: JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 366 (9): 787-98, 2012.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  31. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al.: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 366 (9): 799-807, 2012.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  32. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al.: Efficacy, safety and survival with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: results of a median 2-year follow-up of COMFORT-I. Haematologica 98 (12): 1865-71, 2013.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  33. Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, et al.: Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Blood 122 (25): 4047-53, 2013.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  34. Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R: A comprehensive review and analysis of the effect of ruxolitinib therapy on the survival of patients with myelofibrosis. Blood 121 (24): 4832-7, 2013.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  35. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al.: The clinical benefit of ruxolitinib across patient subgroups: analysis of a placebo-controlled, Phase III study in patients with myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol 161 (4): 508-16, 2013.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  36. Tefferi A, Litzow MR, Pardanani A: Long-term outcome of treatment with ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 365 (15): 1455-7, 2011.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  37. Verstovsek S: Janus-activated kinase 2 inhibitors: a new era of targeted therapies providing significant clinical benefit for Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. J Clin Oncol 29 (7): 781-3, 2011.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  38. Tefferi A: JAK inhibitors for myeloproliferative neoplasms: clarifying facts from myths. Blood 119 (12): 2721-30, 2012.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  39. Barosi G, Ambrosetti A, Centra A, et al.: Splenectomy and risk of blast transformation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Italian Cooperative Study Group on Myeloid with Myeloid Metaplasia. Blood 91 (10): 3630-6, 1998.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  40. Lavrenkov K, Krepel-Volsky S, Levi I, et al.: Low dose palliative radiotherapy for splenomegaly in hematologic disorders. Leuk Lymphoma 53 (3): 430-4, 2012.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  41. Mesa RA, Nagorney DS, Schwager S, et al.: Palliative goals, patient selection, and perioperative platelet management: outcomes and lessons from 3 decades of splenectomy for myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia at the Mayo Clinic. Cancer 107 (2): 361-70, 2006.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  42. Ruggeri M, Rodeghiero F, Tosetto A, et al.: Postsurgery outcomes in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: a retrospective survey. Blood 111 (2): 666-71, 2008.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  43. Tefferi A, Mesa RA, Nagorney DM, et al.: Splenectomy in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a single-institution experience with 223 patients. Blood 95 (7): 2226-33, 2000.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  44. Sacchi S: The role of alpha-interferon in essential thrombocythaemia, polycythaemia vera and myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM): a concise update. Leuk Lymphoma 19 (1-2): 13-20, 1995.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  45. Gilbert HS: Long term treatment of myeloproliferative disease with interferon-alpha-2b: feasibility and efficacy. Cancer 83 (6): 1205-13, 1998.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  46. Strupp C, Germing U, Scherer A, et al.: Thalidomide for the treatment of idiopathic myelofibrosis. Eur J Haematol 72 (1): 52-7, 2004.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  47. Mesa RA, Elliott MA, Schroeder G, et al.: Durable responses to thalidomide-based drug therapy for myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Mayo Clin Proc 79 (7): 883-9, 2004.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  48. Jabbour E, Thomas D, Kantarjian H, et al.: Comparison of thalidomide and lenalidomide as therapy for myelofibrosis. Blood 118 (4): 899-902, 2011.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  49. Mesa RA, Camoriano JK, Geyer SM, et al.: A phase II trial of tipifarnib in myelofibrosis: primary, post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia. Leukemia 21 (9): 1964-70, 2007.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  50. Guardiola P, Anderson JE, Bandini G, et al.: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Société Française de Greffe de Moelle, Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto del Midollo Osseo, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Collaborative Study. Blood 93 (9): 2831-8, 1999.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  51. Deeg HJ, Gooley TA, Flowers ME, et al.: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis. Blood 102 (12): 3912-8, 2003.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  52. Daly A, Song K, Nevill T, et al.: Stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a report from two Canadian centers. Bone Marrow Transplant 32 (1): 35-40, 2003.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  53. Gupta V, Hari P, Hoffman R: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors. Blood 120 (7): 1367-79, 2012.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  54. Kröger N, Holler E, Kobbe G, et al.: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with myelofibrosis: a prospective, multicenter study of the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood 114 (26): 5264-70, 2009.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  55. Abelsson J, Merup M, Birgegård G, et al.: The outcome of allo-HSCT for 92 patients with myelofibrosis in the Nordic countries. Bone Marrow Transplant 47 (3): 380-6, 2012.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  56. Alchalby H, Yunus DR, Zabelina T, et al.: Risk models predicting survival after reduced-intensity transplantation for myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol 157 (1): 75-85, 2012.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  57. Alchalby H, Badbaran A, Zabelina T, et al.: Impact of JAK2V617F mutation status, allele burden, and clearance after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis. Blood 116 (18): 3572-81, 2010.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  58. Tefferi A, Silverstein MN, Li CY: 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine treatment after splenectomy in patients who have myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Br J Haematol 99 (2): 352-7, 1997.  [PUBMED Abstract]