 |
Clinical Trial Questions?
|
 |
|
Phase II/III Randomized Study of Neoadjuvant Therapy Comprising Exemestane Versus Letrozole Versus Anastrozole in Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor Positive Stage II or III Breast Cancer
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Trial Contact Information Related Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Exemestane, Letrozole, or Anastrozole in Treating Postmenopausal Women Who Are Undergoing Surgery for Stage II or Stage III Breast Cancer
Basic Trial Information
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Protocol IDs |
|---|
| Phase III, Phase II | Treatment | Active | Postmenopausal | ACOSOG-Z1031 CALGB-ACOSOG-Z1031, SDC1, NCT00265759 |
Special Category:
NCI Web site featured trial, CTSU trial Objectives Primary - Determine whether anastrozole, exemestane, or letrozole administered for 16 to 18 weeks as neoadjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal patients with stage II or stage III estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer should be chosen as the aromatase inhibitor arm of a future study that will compare neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (Cohort A)
- To determine whether patients who have
a high Ki-67 value (> 10%) after 2 weeks of neoadjuvant AI treatment experience a higher than
expected pathological response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (20%) than would be typically
observed for postmenopausal patients with unselected ER+ rich tumors (estimated to be 5%),
indicating that an early assessment of proliferation is a useful approach to the identification of a
chemotherapy sensitive subgroup of ER+ tumors. (Cohort B [patients enrolled after the 375th patient])
Secondary - Compare the neoadjuvant treatment regimens relative to the rates of improvement in surgical outcome: mastectomy with primary skin closure and negative surgical
margins (for T4 a, b, c tumors); breast
conserving surgery with negative final margins (for T3 tumors and T2 tumors classified as requiring mastectomy at baseline); breast
conserving surgery at first attempt (for T2 tumors classified as potential candidates for breast conservation).
- Compare and confirm the radiological response rates (mammography and ultrasound by central radiological analysis) between these three neoadjuvant treatment regimens.
- Compare the relative safety of the neoadjuvant treatment regimens in terms of reported adverse events.
- To compare the tumor pathologic size between the neoadjuvant treatment regimens, to
compare the rates of pathological complete response, and to compare down-staging to stage I.
- To compare the rate of complete cell cycle response between the three treatment regimens
(Ki67 staining of 1% or less in the post treatment sample).
- Compare the incidence of metastatic lymph node involvement on the three arms of the study in patients who have a lymph node dissection at the end of neoadjuvant treatment.
- Determine the 10-year incidence of local recurrence in patients treated with these regimens.
- To collect tumor tissue, serum specimens, and plasma specimens to develop predictive
biomarkers that can be used to select tumors for neoadjuvant AI therapy.
- Collect surgical specimens post-AI neoadjuvant therapy to identify markers of de novo resistence to AI therapy.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Diagnosis of breast cancer
- T2-T4c, any N, M0 disease
- Clinically staged, as documented by the operating surgeon, as 1 of the following:
- T4a-c disease for which modified radical mastectomy with negative margins is the goal
- T2 or T3 disease for which conversion from needing mastectomy to breast conservation is the goal
- T2 disease for which lumpectomy at first attempt is the goal
- Primary tumor must be palpable and measure > 2 cm by tape, ruler, or caliper measurements in at least one dimension
- Must agree to undergo mastectomy or lumpectomy after neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy
- No inflammatory breast cancer, defined as clinically significant erythema of the breast and/or documented dermal lymphatic invasion (not direct skin invasion by tumor or peau d’orange without erythema)
- No distant metastasis (M1)
- Isolated ipsilateral supraclavicular node involvement allowed
- No diagnosis that was established by incisional biopsy
- Must have estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumor with an Allred score of 6, 7 or 8
- Patients with > 66.66% (two-thirds) of cells staining positive and have a minimum Allred score of 6 are eligible
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
- No prior treatment for invasive breast cancer, including radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, or investigational agents
- No prior sentinel lymph node biopsy (cohort B only)
- At least 1 week since prior agents with estrogenic or putatively estrogenic properties, including herbal preparations
- At least 1 week since prior hormone replacement therapy of any type, megestrol acetate, or raloxifene
- No concurrent enrollment in another neoadjuvant clinical trial for treatment of the existing breast cancer
- No other concurrent anti-neoplastic therapy, including chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- No concurrent agents or herbal products that alter ER function
Patient Characteristics:
- ECOG/Zubrod performance status of ≤ 2
- Female
- Patient must be postmenopausal, verified by 1 of the following:
- Bilateral surgical oophorectomy
- No spontaneous menses ≥ 1 year
- No menses for < 1 year with FSH and estradiol levels in postmenopausal range
- No other malignancies within the past 5 years, except for successfully treated cervical carcinoma in situ; lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast; contralateral ductal carcinoma in situ that was treated with mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiotherapy (without tamoxifen); or non-melanoma skin cancer with no evidence of recurrence
- Must have undergone potentially curative therapy for all prior malignancies AND deemed to be at low risk for recurrence, according to the treating physician
Expected Enrollment 567A total of 567 patients (375 for cohort A and 192 for cohort B) will be accrued for this study. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Clinical response (complete or partial response) rate (cohort A) Pathological complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cohort B)
Secondary Outcome(s)Radiological response rate Adverse events as assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0 Progression-free survival and overall survival Rate of improvement in surgical outcome Rate of downstaging to stage I Rate of lymph node involvement Pathological complete response rate (cohort A) Clinical response rate (cohort B)
Outline This is a multicenter study comprising cohort A (phase III study) and cohort B (phase II study). Once cohort A accrual is met (375 patients), subsequent patients are enrolled to cohort B. Patients in both cohorts are stratified according to T stage (T2 vs T3 vs T4), and randomized to 1 of 3 aromatase inhibition (AI) treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive oral exemestane once daily for 16-18 weeks.
- Arm II: Patients receive oral letrozole once daily for 16-18 weeks.
- Arm III: Patients receive oral anastrozole once daily for 16-18 weeks.
Patients in cohort B undergo breast biopsy after 2-4 weeks of AI treatment for analysis of Ki-67 levels. Patients with Ki-67 level ≤ 10% continue AI treatment. Patients with Ki-67 level > 10% (high) are given the option to switch to neoadjuvant
chemotherapy or undergo immediate breast surgery. After completion of AI therapy, all patients undergo partial or radical mastectomy or lumpectomy with or without lymph node dissection. After surgery, patients are followed periodically for 10 years.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations American College of Surgeons Oncology Group  |  |  | | Matthew Ellis, MD, PhD, FRCP, Protocol chair |  | |  | | John Olson, MD, PhD, Protocol co-chair |  | |  |
Cancer and Leukemia Group B  |  |  | | Kevin Hughes, MD, FACS, Principal investigator |  | |  | Trial Sites
 |
 |
 |
 |
| U.S.A. |
 |
| Indiana |
 |
| |
Munster |
 |
| | | | | | | | | Community Hospital |
| | | Erwin Robin, MD | |
|
| Iowa |
 |
| |
Ames |
 |
| | | | McFarland Clinic, PC |
| | | Clinical Trials Office - McFarland Clinic, PC | |
|
| Maryland |
 |
| |
Towson |
 |
| | | | Cancer Institute at St. Joseph Medical Center |
| | | Michael Schultz | |
|
| Minnesota |
 |
| |
Rochester |
 |
| | | | Mayo Clinic Cancer Center |
| | | Clinical Trials Office - All Mayo Clinic Locations | |
|
| Missouri |
 |
| |
Saint Louis |
 |
| | | | Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis |
| | | Matthew Ellis, MD, PhD, FRCP | |
|
| Nebraska |
 |
| |
Omaha |
 |
| | | | Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center |
| | | James Reilly, MD | |
|
| New Jersey |
 |
| |
New Brunswick |
 |
| | | | Cancer Institute of New Jersey at UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School |
| | | Clinical Trials Office - Cancer Institute of New Jersey | |
|
| New Mexico |
 |
| |
Albuquerque |
 |
| | | | Hematology Oncology Associates, PC |
| | | Anne Wallace, MD | |
| | | New Mexico Cancer Center |
| | | Richard Giudice | |
| | | Presbyterian Cancer Treatment Center at Presbyterian Kaseman Hospital |
| | | Anne Wallace, MD | |
| | | University of New Mexico Cancer Center |
| | | Clinical Trials Office - University of New Mexico Cancer Center | |
|
| |
Santa Fe |
 |
| | | New Mexico Cancer Care Associates |
| | | Clinical Trials Office - New Mexico Cancer Care Associates | |
|
| North Carolina |
 |
| |
Kinston |
 |
| | | | Kinston Medical Specialists |
| | | Peter Watson, MD | |
|
| |
Winston-Salem |
 |
| | | Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center |
| | | Clinical Trials Office - Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center | |
|
| Ohio |
 |
| |
Akron |
 |
| | | | McDowell Cancer Center at Akron General Medical Center |
| | | Daniel Guyton, MD | |
|
| Pennsylvania |
 |
| |
Allentown |
 |
| | | | Morgan Cancer Center at Lehigh Valley Hospital - Cedar Crest |
| | | Paul Mosca | |
|
| |
York |
 |
| | | York Cancer Center at Apple Hill Medical Center |
| | | Thomas Bauer, MD | |
|
| Texas |
 |
| |
Dallas |
 |
| | | | Dallas Surgical Group |
| | | Peter Beitsch, MD, FACS | |
|
| |
Laredo |
 |
| | | Doctor's Hospital of Laredo |
| | | Gary Unzeitig, MD | |
|
| Wisconsin |
 |
| |
La Crosse |
 |
| | | | Franciscan Skemp Healthcare - La Crosse Campus |
| | | Mary Kathleen Christian | |
|
Related Information Featured trial article
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing 16 to 18 Weeks of Neoadjuvant Exemestane (25 mg daily), Letrozole (2.5 mg), or Anastrozole (1 mg) in Postmenopausal Women with Clinical Stage II and III Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer |  | | Trial Start Date | | 2006-01-09 |  | | Trial Completion Date | | 2019-08-03 (estimated) |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00265759 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2005-09-27 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2009-11-19 |  | | NCI Grant/Contract Number | | CA76001 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
 |