|
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Cetuximab and Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Colorectal Cancer
Alternate Title Cetuximab and Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone in Treating Patients With Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Colorectal Cancer
Objectives Primary
Secondary
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
[Note: *Failure is defined as either disease progression (clinical or radiological) or intolerance to the regimen] Prior/Concurrent Therapy: Biologic therapy
Chemotherapy
Radiotherapy
Surgery
Other
Patient Characteristics: Age
Performance status
Life expectancy
Hematopoietic
Hepatic
Renal
Cardiovascular
Pulmonary
Other
Expected Enrollment A total of 500 patients (250 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 20 months. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Overall survival Time to progression Outline This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center and ECOG performance status (0 or 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, and then at 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks (or until deterioration to ECOG PS 4 or hospitalization for end-of-life care). Patients are followed every 4 weeks. Published ResultsAu HJ, Karapetis CS, O'Callaghan CJ, et al.: Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: overall and KRAS-specific results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 Trial. J Clin Oncol 27 (11): 1822-8, 2009.[PUBMED Abstract] Powell ED, Asmis T, Jonker D, et al.: Comorbidity and overall survival (OS) in cetuximab-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC)—results from NCIC CTG CO.17: A phase III trial of cetuximab versus best supportive care (BSC). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 27 (Suppl 15): A-4074, 2009. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, et al.: K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359 (17): 1757-65, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract] Mittmann N, Au HJ, Tu D, et al.: A prospective economic analysis of cost-effectiveness of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-6528, 2008. O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Karapetis CS, et al.: The relationship between the development of rash and clinical and quality of life outcomes in colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab in NCIC CTG CO.17. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-4130, 2008. Au H, Karapetis C, Jonker D, et al.: Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-4002, 2007. Jonker DJ, Karapetis CS, Moore M, et al.: Randomized phase III trial of cetuximab monotherapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with pretreated metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive colorectal carcinoma: a trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) and the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG). [Abstract] American Association for Cancer Research: 98th Annual Meeting, April 14-18, 2007, Los Angeles, CA. 2007. Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, et al.: Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357 (20): 2040-8, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Trial Lead Organizations NCIC-Clinical Trials Group
Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NCI Home |
Text-Only Version |
Contact Us |
Policies |
Accessibility |
Viewing Files |
FOIA |
Site Help |
Site Map
|
A Service of the National Cancer Institute |