 |
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Cetuximab and Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Colorectal Cancer
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Published Results Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Cetuximab and Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone in Treating Patients With Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Colorectal Cancer
Basic Trial Information
 |
Phase
 |
 |
 |
 |
Type
 |
 |
 |
 |
Status
 |
 |
 |
 |
Age
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sponsor
 |
 |
 |
 |
Protocol IDs
 |
 |
 |
 |

Phase III

|
 |
 |
 |

Treatment

|
 |
 |
 |

Closed

|
 |
 |
 |

16 and over

|
 |
 |
 |

Other, Pharmaceutical / Industry

|
 |
 |
 |

CAN-NCIC-CO17 AGITG-CAN-NCIC-CO17, BMS-CA225-025, IMCL-CAN-NCIC-CO17, NCT00079066, CO17

|
 |
|
Objectives Primary - Compare survival of patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor-positive colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab and best supportive care vs best supportive care alone.
Secondary - Compare the time to disease progression in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the objective response rate in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the health utilities of patients treated with these regimens.
- Conduct a comparative economic evaluation in patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the safety profile of cetuximab in these patients.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Histologically confirmed colorectal cancer
- Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive by immunochemistry
- Measurable or evaluable disease
- Not amenable to standard curative therapy
- Best supportive care is the only available option
- Must have received a prior thymidylate synthase inhibitor (e.g., fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) in the adjuvant or metastatic setting
- Combination therapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan allowed
- Must have failed* a prior regimen containing irinotecan and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease OR relapsed within 6 months after an adjuvant regimen containing irinotecan or oxaliplatin OR have documented unsuitability for such regimens
- No symptomatic CNS metastases
[Note: *Failure is defined as either disease progression (clinical or radiological) or intolerance to the regimen] Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy - No prior cetuximab
- No prior murine monoclonal antibody therapy (e.g., edrecolomab)
Chemotherapy - See Disease Characteristics
- At least 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy and recovered
- No concurrent chemotherapy
Radiotherapy - See Disease Characteristics
- At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy and recovered
- Concurrent palliative radiotherapy allowed except to index lesions
Surgery - At least 4 weeks since prior major surgery and recovered
Other - No prior EGFR-targeted therapy (e.g., erlotinib or gefitinib)
- More than 30 days since prior experimental therapeutic agents
- More than 4 weeks since prior investigational agents
- No concurrent enrollment in another clinical study
- No other concurrent EGFR-targeted therapy
- No other concurrent non-cytotoxic experimental agents
Patient Characteristics:
Age Performance status Life expectancy Hematopoietic - See Disease Characteristics
- Absolute granulocyte count ≥ 1,500/mm3
- Platelet count ≥ 75,000/mm3
- Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL
Hepatic - AST and ALT ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Bilirubin ≤ 2.5 times ULN
Renal - Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
Cardiovascular Pulmonary - No severe restrictive lung disease
- No interstitial lung disease by chest x-ray
Other - Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception for 4 weeks before, during, and for 4 weeks after study treatment
- No active pathological condition that would preclude study participation
- No psychological or geographical condition that would preclude study compliance
- No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
Expected Enrollment A total of 500 patients (250 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 20 months. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Overall survival
Secondary Outcome(s)Time to progression Objective response rate Quality of life by European Organization for Research of the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire -C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Health utilities by Health Utilities Index 13 (HU 13) Economic evaluation Safety profile
Outline This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center and ECOG performance status (0 or 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients receive an initial loading dose of cetuximab IV over 120 minutes on day 1. Patients continue to receive maintenance infusions of cetuximab IV over 60 minutes weekly. Patients also receive best supportive care, defined as measures designed to provide palliation of symptoms and improve quality of life as much as possible.
- Arm II: Patients receive best supportive care as in arm I.
In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, and then at 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks (or until deterioration to ECOG PS 4 or hospitalization for end-of-life care). Patients are followed every 4 weeks. Published ResultsMittmann N, Au HJ, Tu D, et al.: A prospective economic analysis of cost-effectiveness of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-6528, 2008. O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Karapetis CS, et al.: The relationship between the development of rash and clinical and quality of life outcomes in colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab in NCIC CTG CO.17. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-4130, 2008. Au H, Karapetis C, Jonker D, et al.: Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-4002, 2007. Jonker DJ, Karapetis CS, Moore M, et al.: Randomized phase III trial of cetuximab monotherapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with pretreated metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive colorectal carcinoma: a trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) and the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG). [Abstract] American Association for Cancer Research: 98th Annual Meeting, April 14-18, 2007, Los Angeles, CA. 2007. Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, et al.: Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357 (20): 2040-8, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract]
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations NCIC-Clinical Trials Group  |  |  | | Derek Jonker, MD, Protocol chair |  | | Ph: 613-737-7700 ext. 70168; 888-627-5346 |
|  |
Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group  |  |  | | Chris Karapetis, MD, Protocol chair |  | |  |
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | A Phase III Randomized Study of Cetuximab (Erbitux™, C225) and Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients with Pretreated Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Positive Colorectal Carcinoma |  | | Trial Start Date | | 2003-08-28 |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00079066 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2004-01-20 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2005-08-08 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
 |