 |
Clinical Trial Questions?
|
 |
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil Versus Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, Filgrastim (G-CSF), and Epoetin Alfa Followed By Paclitaxel Versus Cyclophosphamide and Doxorubicin Followed By Paclitaxel in Premenopausal or Early Postmenopausal Women With Previously Resected Node Positive or High-Risk Node Negative Stage I-IIIB Breast Cancer
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outline Published Results Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Colony-stimulating Factors in Treating Women With Breast Cancer
Basic Trial Information
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Protocol IDs |
|---|
| Phase III | Treatment | Closed | 60 and under | CAN-NCIC-MA21 AMGEN-CAN-NCIC-MA21, NCCTG-CAN-NCIC-MA21, BMS-CAN-NCIC-MA21, JANSSEN-ORTHO-CAN-NCIC-MA21, PFIZER-CAN-NCIC-MA21, NCIC-MA21, NCT00014222, SWOG-CAN-NCIC-MA21, MA21 |
Special Category:
CTSU trial Objectives Primary - Compare the disease-free survival of premenopausal or early postmenopausal women with previously resected node positive or high-risk node negative stage I-IIIB breast cancer treated with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil vs cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, filgrastim (G-CSF), and epoetin alfa followed by paclitaxel vs cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel.
Secondary - Compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the rate of toxic effects of these regimens in this patient population.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy: - No prior immunotherapy for breast cancer
- No concurrent pegfilgrastim or darbepoetin alfa (Arm II)
- Allowed on arms 1 and 3 if medically necessary
Chemotherapy: - No prior chemotherapy for breast cancer
Endocrine therapy: - No prior hormonal therapy for breast cancer
- No concurrent hormone replacement therapy
- No concurrent selective estrogen-receptor modulators (e.g.,
raloxifene for the treatment or prevention of osteoporosis)
- No concurrent oral contraceptives (i.e., birth control pills)
- No other concurrent aromatase inhibitors
Radiotherapy: - See Disease Characteristics
- No prior radiotherapy for breast cancer
Surgery: - See Disease Characteristics
- No more than 12 weeks since prior total or partial mastectomy
(including re-excision of margins)
Other: - At least 30 days since prior investigational drugs
- No other concurrent investigational drugs
- Concurrent bisphosphonates for the treatment or prevention of
osteoporosis allowed
Patient Characteristics:
Age: Sex: Menopausal status: Performance status: Life expectancy: Hematopoietic: - WBC ≥ 3,000/mm3
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm3
Hepatic: - Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal
(ULN)
Renal: - Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
Cardiovascular: - LVEF ≥ limit of normal by MUGA or
echocardiogram
- No arrhythmia requiring ongoing treatment
- No congestive heart failure
- No documented coronary artery disease
Other: - No other malignancy except:
- Adequately
treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the
cervix
- Ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ that has been curatively treated by surgery
alone
- Other prior malignancies (except breast cancer) curatively treated more than 5 years prior to study entry
- No serious underlying medical illness or psychiatric or
addictive disorder that would preclude study compliance
- No known hypersensitivity to E. coli-derived products,
mammalian-cell derived products, or any study agents
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective non-hormonal contraception
Expected Enrollment A total of 2,100 patients (700 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this
study within 4 years. Outline This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified
according to number of positive nodes (0 vs 1-3 vs 4-10 vs more than 10), type
of prior surgery (total vs partial mastectomy), and estrogen receptor status
(positive vs negative). Patients are randomized to one of three treatment
arms. - Arm I: Patients receive epirubicin IV and fluorouracil IV on days 1-8
and oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6
courses.
- Arm II: Patients receive epirubicin IV and cyclophosphamide IV on day 1
and filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) on days 2-13. Patients with a hemoglobin < 13.0 g/dL also receive epoetin alfa SC once weekly beginning within 1 week after the start of therapy and continuing as needed. Treatment
repeats every 14 days for 6 courses.
Beginning 21 days after completion of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide,
patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours on day 1 and G-CSF and epoetin alfa as above.
Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses.
- Arm III: Patients receive doxorubicin IV over 15 minutes and
cyclophosphamide IV over 15 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days
for 4 courses.
Beginning 21 days after completion of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide,
patients receive paclitaxel as in arm II.
Treatment in all arms continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All receptor positive patients receive oral tamoxifen or anastrozole (if tamoxifen is contraindicated) for 5 years after completion of chemotherapy. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, and 20 (arm I),
weeks 4, 8, 13, and 22 (arm II), weeks 3, 9, 12, and 21 (arm III), 9 months,
12 months, and then annually thereafter. Patients are followed at 9 months, 12 months, every 4 months for 1 year,
every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter. Published ResultsBurnell MJ, O'Connor EM, Chapman JW, et al.: Triple-negative receptor status and prognosis in the NCIC CTG MA.21 adjuvant breast cancer trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-550, 2008. Burnell MJ, Levine MN, Chapman JA, et al.: A phase III adjuvant trial of sequenced EC + filgrastim + epoetin-alpha followed by paclitaxel compared to sequenced AC followed by paclitaxel compared to CEF in women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer (NCIC CTG MA.21). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-550, 2007. Burnell M, Levine M, Chapman JA, et al.: A randomized trial of CEF versus dose dense EC followed by paclitaxel versus AC followed by paclitaxel in women with node positive or high risk node negative breast cancer, NCIC CTG MA.21: results of an interim analysis. [Abstract] 29th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 14-17, 2006, San Antonio, Texas. A-53, 2006.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations NCIC-Clinical Trials Group  |  |  | | Mark Levine, MD, Protocol chair(Contact information may not be current) |  | | Ph: 905-527-4322 ext. 42176 |
|  |
North Central Cancer Treatment Group  |  |  | | Edith Perez, MD, Protocol chair |  | |  |
Southwest Oncology Group  |  |  | | Kathy Albain, MD, Study coordinator |  | |  |
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | A Phase III Adjuvant Trial Of Sequenced EC + Filgrastim + Epoetin Alfa Followed By Paclitaxel Versus Sequenced AC Followed By Paclitaxel Versus CEF As Therapy For Premenopausal Women And Early Postmenopausal Women Who Have Had Potentially Curative Surgery For Node Positive Or High Risk Node Negative Breast Cancer |  | | Trial Start Date | | 2000-12-04 |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00014222 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2001-02-06 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2007-06-02 |  | | NCI Grant/Contract Number | | CA77202 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
 |