 |
Clinical Trial Questions?
|
 |
|
Phase II Pilot Study of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Children With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Intensive Remission Induction and Intensification Therapy
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Published Results Related Publications Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Treating Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Remission Induction and Intensification Therapy
Basic Trial Information
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Protocol IDs |
|---|
| Phase II | Treatment | Completed | 1 month to 21 years | COG-AAML03P1 NCT00070174, AAML03P1 |
Objectives Primary - Determine the safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in children with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia undergoing intensive remission induction and intensification therapy.
- Determine the complete remission rate of patients treated with this regimen.
Secondary - Determine the feasibility of performing biological studies (e.g., FLT3-ITD and MRD) for risk group stratification in these patients.
- Determine the effect of karyotypic abnormalities on survival in patients treated with this regimen.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Newly diagnosed primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
- At least 20% bone marrow blasts
- Meets the customary FAB criteria for AML
- Patients with cytopenias and bone marrow blasts who do not meet the FAB criteria are eligible provided they have a karyotypic abnormality characteristic of de novo AML (e.g., t[8;21], inv16, or t[16;16]) OR they have the unequivocal presence of megakaryoblasts
- Isolated granulocytic sarcoma (myeloblastoma) allowed regardless of the results outlined above
- Previously untreated disease
- No promyelocytic leukemia (FAB M3)
- No documented myelodysplastic syndromes (preleukemia) (e.g., chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, refractory anemia [RA], RA with excess blasts, or RA with ringed sideroblasts)
- No juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia
- No Fanconi's anemia, Kostmann syndrome, Shwachman syndrome, or any other known bone marrow failure syndrome
- No Down syndrome
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy Chemotherapy - No prior chemotherapy except intrathecal cytarabine administered that was administered at diagnosis
Endocrine therapy - Prior topical and inhalation steroids allowed
- No concurrent steroids as antiemetics
Radiotherapy Surgery Other - No prior antileukemic therapy
- No concurrent pressor agent or ventilatory support unless approved by the study chair
- No concurrent participation in another COG therapeutic study
Patient Characteristics:
Age [Note: *Children under 1 month of age who have progressive disease are allowed] Performance status - Karnofsky 50-100% (over 16 years of age)
OR - Lansky 50-100% (ages 1 to 16)*
[Note: Children under 1 year of age do not require a performance status] Life expectancy Hematopoietic Hepatic - No inadequate liver function
Renal - No inadequate renal function
- No hyperuricemia (greater than 8.0 mg/dL)
- Creatinine clearance or radioisotope glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at least 70 mL/min OR an equivalent normal GFR
OR - Creatinine no greater than 1.5 times normal
Cardiovascular - Shortening fraction at least 27% by echocardiogram
OR - Ejection fraction at least 50% by MUGA
Pulmonary - No proven or suspected pneumonia
Other - Not pregnant or nursing
- No proven or suspected sepsis or meningitis
Expected Enrollment A total of 330 patients will be accrued for this study. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Safety Complete remission rate
Secondary Outcome(s)Feasibility Effect of karyotypic abnormalities
Outline This is a multicenter study. - Induction I: Patients receive high-dose cytarabine (ARA-C) IV twice daily on days 1-10; daunorubicin IV over 6 hours on days 1, 3, and 5; etoposide IV over 4 hours on days 1-5; and gemtuzumab ozogamicin IV over 2 hours on day 6. Patients with CNS-negative disease receive ARA-C intrathecally (IT) on day 1. Patients with CNS-positive disease receive ARA-C IT twice weekly for 2-3 weeks. Between days 28-35, patients are evaluated. Patients achieving remission or who have no more than 20% blasts proceed to induction II.
- Induction II: Patients receive ARA-C IV twice daily on days 1-8; ARA-C IT on day 1; and daunorubicin IV and etoposide IV as in induction I. Between days 28-35 patients are evaluated. Patients achieving complete remission proceed to intensification course I.
- Intensification course I: Patients receive ARA-C IV over 1 hour twice daily on days 1-5; ARA-C IT as in induction II; and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Patients are evaluated at day 28. Patients with a 5/6 or 6/6 matched family donor proceed to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. All other patients in complete remission proceed to intensification course II.
- Intensification course II: Patients receive ARA-C IV over 2 hours twice daily on days 1-4; ARA-C IT as in induction II; mitoxantrone IV over 1 hour on days 3-6; and gemtuzumab ozogamicin IV over 2 hours on day 7. Patients are evaluated on day 28 and then proceed to intensification course III.
- Intensification course III: Patients receive ARA-C IV over 3 hours twice daily on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 and asparaginase intramuscularly on days 2 and 9.
- Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: Patients receive a preparative regimen comprising busulfan IV over 2 hours 4 times daily on days -9 to -6 and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour once daily on days -5 to -2. Allogeneic stem cells are infused on day 0.
- Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis: Patients receive oral or IV cyclosporine twice daily on days -1 to 50 and methotrexate IV once daily on days 1, 3, 6, and 11.
In all courses, treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed monthly for 6 months, every 2 months for 6 months, every 4 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 1 year, and then annually thereafter. Published ResultsFranklin J, Alonzo T, Hurwitz CA, et al.: COG AAML03P1: efficacy and safety in a pilot study of intensive chemotherapy including gemtuzumab in children newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A- 136, 2008. Pollard JA, Alonzo T, Gerbing R, et al.: Correlation of CD 33 expression level with disease characteristics and response to gemtuzumab ozogamycin-containing chemotherapy in childhood AML. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-148, 2008. Related PublicationsHo PA, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: Prevalence and prognostic implications of CEBPA mutations in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood 113 (26): 6558-66, 2009.[PUBMED Abstract] Sung L, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: Respiratory syncytial virus infections in children with acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51 (6): 784-6, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract] Pollard J, Alonzo T, Gerbing R, et al.: Prevalence and prognostic significance of c-KIT mutations in pediatric CBF AML patients enrolled on serial CCG/COG protocols. [Abstract] Blood 110 (11): A-1442, 2007.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations Children's Oncology Group  |  |  | | Janet Franklin, MD, MPH, Protocol chair |  | |  |
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Using Intensive MRC-Based Therapy and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GMTZ): A COG Pilot Study |  | | Trial Start Date | | 2003-12-29 |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00070174 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2003-08-15 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2005-11-17 |  | | NCI Grant/Contract Number | | CA98543 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
 |