 |
Clinical Trial Questions?
|
 |
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Irinotecan Hydrochloride With Versus Without Panitumumab or Cyclosporine in Patients With Fluorouracil-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Irinotecan With or Without Panitumumab or Cyclosporine in Treating Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Did Not Respond to Fluorouracil
Basic Trial Information
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Protocol IDs |
|---|
| Phase III | Treatment | Active | 18 and over | CTRU-PICCOLO-MO-05-7289 EUDRACT-2005-003492-20, CTAAC-CTRU-PICCOLO-MO-05-7289, AMGEN-CTRU-PICCOLO-MO-05-7289, EU-20647, NCT00389870 |
Objectives Primary - Compare the efficacy and toxicity
of single-agent irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) vs Ir with cyclosporine (IrC) in patients with fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer.
- Compare the efficacy of single-agent Ir vs Ir with panitumumab (IrP) in these patients.
Secondary - Correlate the toxicity of Ir and/or IrC with genetic variability in the enzymes
involved in irinotecan hydrochloride’s disposition pathway.
- Compare IrC to Ir and its metabolites (SN38;
SN38G), in terms of pharmacokinetic profile.
- Correlate the benefit of IrP with tumor expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or its known
down-stream molecules as a predictive measure.
- Correlate IrP efficacy or toxicity (specifically the severity of skin rash) with somatic alterations in the EGFR gene and/or with germline variability in related genes.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- Previous or current histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of
the colon or rectum and clinical/radiological evidence of advanced or metastatic disease
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma
with clinical or radiological evidence of colorectal primary tumor
- Unidimensionally measurable disease
- Disease progression
during or after prior fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin therapy and/or with or without bevacizumab
- Adjuvant therapy and/or prior therapy for advanced disease allowed
- No clinical or radiological evidence of pleural effusion or ascites causing ≥ grade 2 dyspnea
- No clinical or radiological evidence of biliary obstruction
- No known CNS metastases or carcinomatous meningitis
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No major
thoracic or abdominal surgery within the past 4 weeks
- No systemic anticancer therapy within the past 3 weeks
- No prior irinotecan hydrochloride
- No grapefruit juice within 3 days before and after each chemotherapy treatment
- No experimental drug therapy or antibody therapy, other than cetuximab, within the past 6 weeks
- No systemic chemotherapy and/or cetuximab within the past 3 weeks
- No antifungals or antibiotics within the past 5 days
- No ongoing requirement for cyclosporine or any other medication including, but not limited to, the following:
- Ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole
- Erythromycin, clarithromycin, norfloxacin
- Diltiazem hydrochloride, verapamil, amiodarone hydrochloride
- Fluvoxamine
Patient Characteristics:
- WHO performance status 0-2
- Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
- Hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dL
- WBC > 3,000/mm³
- Platelet count > 100,000/mm³
- Glomerular filtration rate > 50 mL/min OR EDTA
clearance > 60 mL/min
- Bilirubin < 1.46 mg/dL
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN
- No history of Gilbert’s syndrome
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 6 months after completion of study treatment
- Capable of completing quality of life questionnaires
- No prior anaphylactic allergic reaction to cetuximab
- No other prior or concurrent cancer (excluding nonmelanomatous skin cancer)
- No unresolved bowel obstruction,
uncontrolled gastrointestinal infection, chronic enteropathy (e.g., Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis), or
chronic diarrhea (≥ 4 stools per day) of any cause
- No recent history of seizures
- No clinical or radiological evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis,
- Capable of reliable oral self-medication
- No other condition that would make the patient unsuitable
for participation in this study
Expected Enrollment 1269A total of 1,269 patients will be accrued for this study. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Proportion of patients treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) alone vs Ir and cyclosporine (IrC) who are progression-free at 12 weeks Overall survival of patients treated with Ir vs Ir and panitumumab (IrP) and no prior cetuximab
Secondary Outcome(s)Proportion of patients free from treatment failure at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrC Overall survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrC Nurse-assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality, diarrhea ≥ grade 3 at 12 weeks) in patients treated with Ir vs IrC Progression-free at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab Nurse assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality) in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab Progression-free survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab Best response at 1 year in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab Patient-assessed symptom/quality of life/acceptability scores at 12 and 24 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
Outline This is a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prior cetuximab (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1.
- Arm II: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 15-40 minutes on day 1 and oral cyclosporine three times a day on days 1-3.
- Arm III: Patients receive panitumumab IV over 30-90 minutes followed by irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Single-agent panitumumab may be continued during breaks in chemotherapy treatment.
In all arms, treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with responding or stable disease may continue treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 12 weeks for 1 year. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations Clinical Trials and Research Unit of the University of Leeds  |  |  | | Matthew Seymour, MA, MD, FRCP, Protocol chair |  | |  | Trial Sites
 |
 |
 |
 |
| United Kingdom |
 |
| England |
 |
| |
Bournemouth |
 |
| | | | | Royal Bournemouth Hospital NHS Trust |
| | | Tamas Hickish, MD | |
| | Email:
tamas.hickish@rbch.nhs.uk |
|
| |
Brighton |
 |
| | | Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital |
| | | Andrew Webb, MD | |
|
| |
Bristol |
 |
| | | Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre |
| | | Stephen Falk, MD | |
| | Email:
stephen.falk@ubht.nhs.uk |
|
| |
Cambridge |
 |
| | | Addenbrooke's Hospital |
| | | Charles Wilson, MD | |
| | Email:
charles.wilson@addenbrookes.nhs.uk |
|
| |
Cheltenham |
 |
| | | Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital |
| | | Kim Benstead, MD | |
| | Email:
kim.benstead@egnhst.org.uk |
|
| |
Eastbourne |
 |
| | | Eastbourne District General Hospital |
| | | Fiona McKinna, MD | |
| | Email:
fiona.mckinna@bsuh.nhs.uk |
|
| |
Guildford |
 |
| | | St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital |
| | | Gary Middleton | |
| | Email:
gmiddleton@royalsurrey.nhs.uk |
|
| |
Huddersfield, West Yorks |
 |
| | | Huddersfield Royal Infirmary |
| | | Jo Dent | |
|
| |
Huntingdon |
 |
| | | Hinchingbrooke Hospital |
| | | Li Tee Tan, MD | |
|
| |
Keighley |
 |
| | | Airedale General Hospital |
| | | S. Michael Crawford, MD | |
| | Email:
michael.crawford@anhst.nhs.uk |
|
| |
Leeds |
 |
| | | Cookridge Hospital |
| | | Matthew Seymour, MA, MD, FRCP | |
|
| |
Liverpool |
 |
| | | Royal Liverpool University Hospital |
| | | David Smith, MD | |
|
| |
London |
 |
| | | Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woolwich |
| | | Nick Maisey | |
| | Email:
nick.maisey@kcl.ac.uk |
| | | St. Mary's Hospital |
| | | Susan Cleator, MD, PhD | |
| | Email:
s.cleator@imperial.ac.uk |
| | | UCL Cancer Institute |
| | | Astrid Mayer, MD | |
| | Email:
a.mayer@ucl.ac.uk |
|
| |
Maidstone |
 |
| | | Mid Kent Oncology Centre at Maidstone Hospital |
| | | Mark Hill, MD | |
|
| |
Merseyside |
 |
| | | Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology |
| | | Sun Myint, MD, FRCP(Edin), DMRT, FFRCS, FRCP | |
| | Email:
sun.myint@ccotrust.nhs.uk |
|
| |
Middlesbrough |
 |
| | | James Cook University Hospital |
| | | N. Wadd, MD | |
|
| |
Northwood |
 |
| | | Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital |
| | | Robert Glynne-Jones, MD | |
| | Email:
robglynnejones@nhs.net |
|
| |
Peterborough |
 |
| | | Peterborough Hospitals Trust |
| | | Karen McAdam, MD | |
|
| |
Poole Dorset |
 |
| | | Dorset Cancer Centre |
| | | Tamas Hickish, MD | |
|
| |
Portsmouth Hants |
 |
| | | Portsmouth Oncology Centre at Saint Mary's Hospital |
| | | Ann O'Callaghan, MD | | Ph: | 44-23-9228-6000 ext. 2361 | | |
|
| | Email:
ann.o'callaghan@porthosp.nhs.uk |
|
| |
Sheffield |
 |
| | | Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital |
| | | Jonathan Wadsley | |
|
| |
South Shields |
 |
| | | South Tyneside District Hospital |
| | | Ashraf Azzabi, MD | |
|
| |
Sutton |
 |
| | | Royal Marsden - Surrey |
| | | Ian Chau, MD | |
|
| |
Swindon |
 |
| | | Great Western Hospital |
| | | Claire Blesing | |
|
| |
Worthing |
 |
| | | Worthing Hospital |
| | | Andrew Webb, MD | |
|
| |
Yeovil |
 |
| | | Yeovil District Hospital |
| | | Stephen Falk, MD | |
| | Email:
stephen.falk@swest.uhs.uk |
|
| Scotland |
 |
| |
Edinburgh |
 |
| | | | Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital |
| | | Lesley Dawson | |
|
| Wales |
 |
| |
Bangor |
 |
| | | | Ysbyty Gwynedd |
| | | Catherine Bale | |
|
| |
Cardiff |
 |
| | | Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital |
| | | Timothy Maughan, MD | |
|
| |
Rhyl, Denbighshire |
 |
| | | Glan Clwyd Hospital |
| | | Simon Gollins, MD | |
| | Email:
simon.gollins@cd-tr.wales.nhs.uk |
|
| |
Swansea |
 |
| | | South West Wales Cancer Institute |
| | | John Wagstaff, MD, MB, ChB, FRCP | |
| | Email:
profwagstaff@netscape.net |
|
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | A Randomised Clinical Trial of Treatment for Fluorouracil-Resistant Advanced Colorectal Cancer Comparing Standard Single-Agent Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab and Versus Irinotecan Plus Ciclosporin [Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal Cancer Therapy (PICCOLO)] |  | | Trial Start Date | | 2006-12-04 |  | | Trial Completion Date | | 2010-03-01 (estimated) |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00389870 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2006-09-18 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2007-07-17 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
 |