National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute
U.S. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute
NCI Home Cancer Topics Clinical Trials Cancer Statistics Research & Funding News About NCI
Clinical Trials (PDQ®)
Patient VersionHealth Professional Version
Last Modified: 12/4/2007     First Published: 10/14/2006  
Page Options
Print This Page  Print This Page
E-Mail This Document  E-Mail This Document
Clinical Trial Questions?

Get Help:

1-800-4-CANCER or

LiveHelp online chat

Quick Links
Help Using the NCI Clinical Trials Search Form

Educational Materials About Clinical Trials

About NCI's Cancer Clinical Trials Registry

Dictionary of Cancer Terms

NCI Drug Dictionary
Phase III Randomized Study of Irinotecan Hydrochloride With Versus Without Panitumumab or Cyclosporine in Patients With Fluorouracil-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Alternate Title
Basic Trial Information
Objectives
Entry Criteria
Expected Enrollment
Outcomes
Outline
Trial Contact Information
Registry Information

Alternate Title

Irinotecan With or Without Panitumumab or Cyclosporine in Treating Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Did Not Respond to Fluorouracil

Basic Trial Information

PhaseTypeStatusAgeSponsorProtocol IDs
Phase IIITreatmentActive18 and overOther, Pharmaceutical / IndustryCTRU-PICCOLO-MO-05-7289
EUDRACT-2005-003492-20, CTAAC-CTRU-PICCOLO-MO-05-7289, AMGEN-CTRU-PICCOLO-MO-05-7289, EU-20647, NCT00389870

Objectives

Primary

  1. Compare the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) vs Ir with cyclosporine (IrC) in patients with fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer.
  2. Compare the efficacy of single-agent Ir vs Ir with panitumumab (IrP) in these patients.

Secondary

  1. Correlate the toxicity of Ir and/or IrC with genetic variability in the enzymes involved in irinotecan hydrochloride’s disposition pathway.
  2. Compare IrC to Ir and its metabolites (SN38; SN38G), in terms of pharmacokinetic profile.
  3. Correlate the benefit of IrP with tumor expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or its known down-stream molecules as a predictive measure.
  4. Correlate IrP efficacy or toxicity (specifically the severity of skin rash) with somatic alterations in the EGFR gene and/or with germline variability in related genes.

Entry Criteria

Disease Characteristics:

  • Diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma meeting 1 of the following criteria:
    • Previous or current histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and clinical/radiological evidence of advanced or metastatic disease
    • Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma with clinical or radiological evidence of colorectal primary tumor
  • Unidimensionally measurable disease
  • Disease progression during or after prior fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin therapy and/or with or without bevacizumab
    • Adjuvant therapy and/or prior therapy for advanced disease allowed
  • No clinical or radiological evidence of pleural effusion or ascites causing ≥ grade 2 dyspnea
  • No clinical or radiological evidence of biliary obstruction
  • No known CNS metastases or carcinomatous meningitis

Prior/Concurrent Therapy:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No major thoracic or abdominal surgery within the past 4 weeks
  • No systemic anticancer therapy within the past 3 weeks
  • No prior irinotecan hydrochloride
  • No grapefruit juice within 3 days before and after each chemotherapy treatment
  • No experimental drug therapy or antibody therapy, other than cetuximab, within the past 6 weeks
  • No systemic chemotherapy and/or cetuximab within the past 3 weeks
  • No antifungals or antibiotics within the past 5 days
  • No ongoing requirement for cyclosporine or any other medication including, but not limited to, the following:
    • Ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole
    • Erythromycin, clarithromycin, norfloxacin
    • Diltiazem hydrochloride, verapamil, amiodarone hydrochloride
    • Fluvoxamine

Patient Characteristics:

  • WHO performance status 0-2
  • Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
  • Hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dL
  • WBC > 3,000/mm³
  • Platelet count > 100,000/mm³
  • Glomerular filtration rate > 50 mL/min OR EDTA clearance > 60 mL/min
  • Bilirubin < 1.46 mg/dL
  • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN
  • No history of Gilbert’s syndrome
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 6 months after completion of study treatment
  • Capable of completing quality of life questionnaires
  • No prior anaphylactic allergic reaction to cetuximab
  • No other prior or concurrent cancer (excluding nonmelanomatous skin cancer)
  • No unresolved bowel obstruction, uncontrolled gastrointestinal infection, chronic enteropathy (e.g., Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis), or chronic diarrhea (≥ 4 stools per day) of any cause
  • No recent history of seizures
  • No clinical or radiological evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis,
  • Capable of reliable oral self-medication
  • No other condition that would make the patient unsuitable for participation in this study

Expected Enrollment

1269

A total of 1,269 patients will be accrued for this study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome(s)

Proportion of patients treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) alone vs Ir and cyclosporine (IrC) who are progression-free at 12 weeks
Overall survival of patients treated with Ir vs Ir and panitumumab (IrP) and no prior cetuximab

Secondary Outcome(s)

Proportion of patients free from treatment failure at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Overall survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Nurse-assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality, diarrhea ≥ grade 3 at 12 weeks) in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Progression-free at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
Nurse assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality) in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
Progression-free survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
Best response at 1 year in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
Patient-assessed symptom/quality of life/acceptability scores at 12 and 24 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab

Outline

This is a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prior cetuximab (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1.
  • Arm II: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 15-40 minutes on day 1 and oral cyclosporine three times a day on days 1-3.
  • Arm III: Patients receive panitumumab IV over 30-90 minutes followed by irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Single-agent panitumumab may be continued during breaks in chemotherapy treatment.

In all arms, treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with responding or stable disease may continue treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 12 weeks for 1 year.

Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK

Trial Contact Information

Trial Lead Organizations

Clinical Trials and Research Unit of the University of Leeds

Matthew Seymour, MA, MD, FRCP, Protocol chair
Ph: 44-113-267-3411

Trial Sites

United Kingdom
England
  Bournemouth
 Royal Bournemouth Hospital NHS Trust
 Tamas Hickish, MD
Ph: 44-120-230-3626
 Email: tamas.hickish@rbch.nhs.uk
  Brighton
 Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital
 Andrew Webb, MD
Ph: 44-12-7369-6955
  Bristol
 Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
 Stephen Falk, MD
Ph: 44-117-928-2416
 Email: stephen.falk@ubht.nhs.uk
  Cambridge
 Addenbrooke's Hospital
 Charles Wilson, MD
Ph: 44-1223-217-110
 Email: charles.wilson@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
  Cheltenham
 Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital
 Kim Benstead, MD
Ph: 44-845-422-2222
 Email: kim.benstead@egnhst.org.uk
  Eastbourne
 Eastbourne District General Hospital
 Fiona McKinna, MD
Ph: 44-132-341-7400
 Email: fiona.mckinna@bsuh.nhs.uk
  Guildford
 St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital
 Gary Middleton
Ph: 44-148-357-1122
 Email: gmiddleton@royalsurrey.nhs.uk
  Huddersfield, West Yorks
 Huddersfield Royal Infirmary
 Jo Dent
Ph: 44-1484-342-000
  Huntingdon
 Hinchingbrooke Hospital
 Li Tee Tan, MD
Ph: 44-1480-416-416
  Keighley
 Airedale General Hospital
 S. Michael Crawford, MD
Ph: 44-1535-652-511
 Email: michael.crawford@anhst.nhs.uk
  Leeds
 Cookridge Hospital
 Matthew Seymour, MA, MD, FRCP
Ph: 44-113-267-3411
  Liverpool
 Royal Liverpool University Hospital
 David Smith, MD
Ph: 44-151-706-2000
  London
 Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woolwich
 Nick Maisey
Ph: 44-208-836-6000
 Email: nick.maisey@kcl.ac.uk
 St. Mary's Hospital
 Susan Cleator, MD, PhD
Ph: 44-207-886-6666
 Email: s.cleator@imperial.ac.uk
 UCL Cancer Institute
 Astrid Mayer, MD
Ph: 44-207-794-0500
 Email: a.mayer@ucl.ac.uk
  Maidstone
 Mid Kent Oncology Centre at Maidstone Hospital
 Mark Hill, MD
Ph: 44-1622-729-000
  Merseyside
 Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
 Sun Myint, MD, FRCP(Edin), DMRT, FFRCS, FRCP
Ph: 44-151-334-1155
 Email: sun.myint@ccotrust.nhs.uk
  Middlesbrough
 James Cook University Hospital
 N. Wadd, MD
Ph: 44-1642-850-850
  Northwood
 Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
 Robert Glynne-Jones, MD
Ph: 44-192-382-6111
 Email: robglynnejones@nhs.net
  Peterborough
 Peterborough Hospitals Trust
 Karen McAdam, MD
Ph: 44-173-387-4000
  Poole Dorset
 Dorset Cancer Centre
 Tamas Hickish, MD
Ph: 44-120-266-5511
  Portsmouth Hants
 Portsmouth Oncology Centre at Saint Mary's Hospital
 Ann O'Callaghan, MD
Ph: 44-23-9228-6000 ext. 2361
 Email: ann.o'callaghan@porthosp.nhs.uk
  Sheffield
 Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
 Jonathan Wadsley
Ph: 44-114-226-5000
  South Shields
 South Tyneside District Hospital
 Ashraf Azzabi, MD
Ph: 44-191-202-4178
  Sutton
 Royal Marsden - Surrey
 Ian Chau, MD
Ph: 44-208-661-3582
  Swindon
 Great Western Hospital
 Claire Blesing
Ph: 44-1793-604-020
  Worthing
 Worthing Hospital
 Andrew Webb, MD
Ph: 44-1903-205-111
  Yeovil
 Yeovil District Hospital
 Stephen Falk, MD
Ph: 44-193-547-5122
 Email: stephen.falk@swest.uhs.uk
Scotland
  Edinburgh
 Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
 Lesley Dawson
Ph: 44-131-537-1000
Wales
  Bangor
 Ysbyty Gwynedd
 Catherine Bale
Ph: 44-124-838-4384
  Cardiff
 Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
 Timothy Maughan, MD
Ph: 44-29-2061-5888
  Rhyl, Denbighshire
 Glan Clwyd Hospital
 Simon Gollins, MD
Ph: 44-1745-583-910
 Email: simon.gollins@cd-tr.wales.nhs.uk
  Swansea
 South West Wales Cancer Institute
 John Wagstaff, MD, MB, ChB, FRCP
Ph: 44-179-220-2666
 Email: profwagstaff@netscape.net

Registry Information
Official Title A Randomised Clinical Trial of Treatment for Fluorouracil-Resistant Advanced Colorectal Cancer Comparing Standard Single-Agent Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab and Versus Irinotecan Plus Ciclosporin [Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal Cancer Therapy (PICCOLO)]
Trial Start Date 2006-12-04
Trial Completion Date 2010-03-01 (estimated)
Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00389870
Date Submitted to PDQ 2006-09-18
Information Last Verified 2007-07-17

Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol.

Back to TopBack to Top

A Service of the National Cancer Institute
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health USA.gov