 |
Clinical Trial Questions?
|
 |
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Epoetin alfa With or Without Filgrastim (G-CSF) Versus Standard Transfusion Support in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outline Published Results Related Publications Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Epoetin alfa With or Without Filgrastim Compared With Blood Transfusions in Treating Patients With
Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Basic Trial Information
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Protocol IDs |
|---|
| Phase III | Supportive care, Treatment | Closed | 18 and over | ECOG-1996 E1996, NCT00003138 |
Objectives - Compare the benefit of epoetin alfa vs standard transfusion support in reducing transfusion requirements in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
- Compare the clinical response, disease progression, and survival in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Determine the effect of pretreatment epoetin alfa levels on the response to epoetin alfa in these patients.
- Evaluate whether adding filgrastim (G-CSF) or increasing the epoetin alfa dose will reduce the transfusion requirement in patients who do not respond to epoetin alfa alone.
- Assess quality of life (QOL) of these patients and determine whether either cross-sectional or longitudinal differences in patients' QOL and fatigue are correlated with the use of the growth factors.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Histologically proven myelodysplastic syndromes
- Refractory anemia (RA)
- RA with ringed sideroblasts
- RA with excess blasts (RAEB)
- RAEB patients must have a bone marrow blast count of less than 20% and
less
than 5% blast forms on peripheral blood
- No RAEB in transformation
- No chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
- Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes allowed
- No splenomegaly greater than 6 cm below the left costal margin
or greater than 3 times normal size
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy: - Prior epoetin alfa allowed provided dosage was less than 30,000 units
per week for less than 1 month duration
- At least 1 month since prior epoetin alfa
- At least 2 months since prior recombinant growth
factor
Chemotherapy: - At least 2 months since prior chemotherapy for other
malignancy or autoimmune disease
Endocrine therapy: - At least 2 weeks since prior androgens or steroids for
treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes
Radiotherapy: Surgery: Patient Characteristics:
Age: Performance status: Life expectancy: Hematopoietic: - See Disease Characteristics
- Platelet count greater than 30,000/mm3 (without platelet
transfusions)
- Hematocrit less than 30% (pretransfusion)
Hepatic: - Bilirubin less than 3 mg/dL
Renal: - BUN less than 40 mg/dL
OR - Creatinine less than 2.0 mg/dL
Cardiovascular: - No uncontrolled hypertension
Other: - No sensitivity to E. coli-derived proteins
- No sensitivity to epoetin alfa or any of its components (e.g.,
human albumin)
- No documented iron deficiency
- If marrow iron stain is not available, the transferrin
saturation must be greater than 20% or ferritin greater than 100
ng/dL
- No active infection or bleeding
- No other uncontrolled malignancy
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
Expected Enrollment 139A total of 139 patients will be accrued for this study within 3.6 years. Outline This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, cross-over study.
Patients are stratified according to morphologic subtype (refractory anemia
[RA] vs RA with ringed sideroblasts vs RA with excess blasts), transfusion
requirement (yes vs no), prior epoetin alfa treatment (yes vs no), and epoetin
alfa level (at least 200 mU/mL vs less than 200 mU/mL). Patients are
randomized to one of two treatment arms. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 4 months during study, and at
study completion. Patients are followed every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3
years, and then annually for 5 years. Published ResultsMiller KB, Kim HT, Greenberg P, et al.: Phase III prospective randomized trial of EPO with or without G-CSF versus supportive therapy alone in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): results of the ECOG- CLSG trial (E1996). [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-70, 2004. Related PublicationsDewald G, Hicks G, Higgins RR, et al.: Comparison of interphase fish and metaphase cytogenetics to study myelodysplasia: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study. [Abstract] Blood 96 (11 Pt 1): A-635, 148a, 2000.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group  |  |  | | Kenneth Miller, MD, Protocol chair(Contact information may not be current) |  | |  |
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | Phase III Evaluation of EPO with or without G-CSF versus Supportive Therapy Alone in the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes |  | | Trial Start Date | | 1997-11-04 |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00003138 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 1997-11-07 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2003-06-16 |  | | NCI Grant/Contract Number | | U10-CA21115 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
 |