National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute
U.S. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute
NCI Home Cancer Topics Clinical Trials Cancer Statistics Research & Funding News About NCI
Clinical Trials (PDQ®)
Patient VersionHealth Professional Version
Last Modified: 12/6/2007     First Published: 1/1/1996  
Page Options
Print This Page  Print This Page
E-Mail This Document  E-Mail This Document
Clinical Trial Questions?

Get Help:

1-800-4-CANCER or

LiveHelp online chat

Quick Links
Help Using the NCI Clinical Trials Search Form

Educational Materials About Clinical Trials

About NCI's Cancer Clinical Trials Registry

Dictionary of Cancer Terms

NCI Drug Dictionary
Phase III Randomized Study of Prednisone Versus Dexamethasone Plus Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, and Vincristine as Induction; Cytarabine, Mitoxantrone, Methotrexate, Leucovorin Calcium, and Asparaginase as Consolidation; Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation; and Low- or High-Intensity Maintenance Chemotherapy With Cranial Irradiation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Alternate Title
Basic Trial Information
Objectives
Entry Criteria
Expected Enrollment
Outline
Published Results
Related Publications
Trial Contact Information
Registry Information

Alternate Title

Chemotherapy With or Without Bone Marrow Transplantation in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Basic Trial Information

PhaseTypeStatusAgeSponsorProtocol IDs
Phase IIITreatmentClosed15 to 60OtherEORTC-06951
FRE-LALA-94, NCT00002700

Objectives

  1. Compare the remission induction, toxicity, and duration of remission in patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma treated with prednisone vs dexamethasone plus cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, and vincristine as induction.
  2. Compare the survival and disease-free survival of patients treated with autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) followed by low- or high-intensity maintenance chemotherapy with cranial irradiation after consolidation.
  3. Determine the relative and disease-free survival of patients treated with autologous or allogeneic BMT after identical induction, consolidation, and conditioning regimens.

Entry Criteria

Disease Characteristics:

  • Newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma with more than 30% blasts in bone marrow

Prior/Concurrent Therapy:

Biologic therapy:

  • No prior biologic therapy

Chemotherapy:

  • No prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

  • No prior endocrine therapy

Radiotherapy:

  • No prior radiotherapy

Surgery:

  • No prior surgery

Patient Characteristics:

Age:

  • 15 to 60

Performance status:

  • Not specified

Life expectancy:

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Hepatic:

  • Bilirubin less than 2 mg/dL (unless elevation due to leukemic involvement of liver)

Renal:

  • Creatinine less than 2 mg/dL (unless elevation due to leukemic involvement of kidneys)

Cardiovascular:

  • No severe cardiac disease

Pulmonary:

  • No severe pulmonary disease

Other:

  • No severe neurologic or metabolic disease
  • HIV negative (if tested)
  • No other prior malignancy except nonmelanomatous skin cancer, stage I cervical carcinoma, or other curatively treated malignancy

Expected Enrollment

392

A total of 392 patients will be accrued for this study within approximately 6 years.

Outline

This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center and risk group (high vs standard).

Induction

  • Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
    • Arm I:Patients receive daunorubicin IV on days 1-3 and 15 and 16; cyclophosphamide (CTX) IV on days 1 and 8; vincristine (VCR) IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and prednisone IV or orally every 8 hours on days 1-7 and 15-21.


    • Arm II: Patients receive daunorubicin, CTX, and VCR as in arm I and dexamethasone IV or orally on days 1-8 and 15-22.




  • Patients on both arms without CNS disease at presentation receive CNS prophylaxis comprising methotrexate (MTX) intrathecally (IT) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Patients on both arms with CNS disease at presentation receive CNS therapy comprising hydrocortisone (HC) IT and MTX IT alternating with cytarabine (ARA-C) IT twice a week until CSF clears. After induction, patients on both arms proceed to consolidation, regardless of response.


Consolidation

  • Patients receive ARA-C IV over 2 hours every 12 hours on days 29-34 and mitoxantrone IV on days 33-35. Patients without CNS disease at presentation receive CNS prophylaxis comprising MTX IT on day 29. Patients with CNS disease at presentation receive CNS therapy comprising HC IT and MTX IT alternating with ARA-C weekly for 6 weeks. Patients who achieve complete response (CR) at day 55-60 receive MTX IV on days 64 and 79, leucovorin calcium IV or orally every 6 hours on days 65-67 and 80-82, and asparaginase IV over 1 hour or intramuscularly on days 65 and 80.


  • Standard-risk patients who are under age 20 and achieve CR after day 80 are assigned to arm IV of group A. Patients who achieve CR after day 80 and have a genotypically or phenotypically HLA-matched family donor, a family donor mismatched at only 1 locus (A, B, or DR), or an HLA-matched unrelated donor proceed to group B. Patients who achieve CR after day 80 and are eligible for autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) proceed to group A. Patients found to be at extremely high risk are taken off study.

    Group A

    • Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
      • Arm III: Autologous bone marrow is harvested. Patients receive bone marrow ablation comprising CTX IV over 1 hour on days -4 and -3 and total body irradiation on day -1. Autologous bone marrow is reinfused on day 0. Beginning at month 8 (4 months after BMT), patients receive first maintenance comprising VCR IV, doxorubicin IV, and dexamethasone IV (VAD) or VCR IV, doxorubicin IV, and prednisolone IV (VAP) on days 1-4 and 29-32. Patients receive second maintenance comprising oral mercaptopurine daily and oral MTX daily beginning at month 10 and continuing through year 3. Patients without CNS disease at presentation receive CNS prophylaxis comprising MTX IT on days 1 and 29. Patients with CNS disease at presentation receive CNS therapy comprising ARA-C IT, MTX IT, and HC IT beginning at 1 month after BMT and continuing monthly for 1 year and then every 3 months through year 3.


      • Arm IV: Patients receive CTX IV and ARA-C IV continuously on day 1, oral mercaptopurine on days 8-28, and oral MTX on days 8, 15, and 22 during months 4, 7, 11, 13, 17, 21, 25, and 29. Patients receive MTX IV over 30 minutes on day 1, leucovorin calcium IV or orally every 6 hours on days 2-4, asparaginase IV over 1 hour or intramuscularly on day 2, oral mercaptopurine on days 8-28, and oral MTX on days 8, 15, and 22 during months 6, 10, 12, 15, 19, 23, and 27. Patients receive VAD or VAP as in arm III beginning at month 8. Patients without CNS disease at presentation receive CNS prophylaxis comprising whole brain radiotherapy and MTX IT on day 1 of radiotherapy during month 5. Patients with CNS disease at presentation receive CNS therapy as in arm III.




    Group B

    • Allogeneic bone marrow is harvested. Patients receive bone marrow ablation as in arm III beginning on day 100. Allogeneic bone marrow is infused over 15-30 minutes on day 0.


  • Patients in groups A and B with CNS disease at presentation undergo radiotherapy to focal infiltration at entry or concurrently with total body irradiation, or whole brain radiotherapy during maintenance (if no prior CNS irradiation). At any time during the study, patients who develop marrow relapse (more than 5% leukemic blasts in bone marrow on 2 occasions), CNS relapse (blasts in CSF, cranial nerve palsy, or CNS mass), or testis or other extramedullary relapse are taken off study.


Published Results

Le QH, Thomas X, Ecochard R, et al.: Proportion of long-term event-free survivors and lifetime of adult patients not cured after a standard acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapeutic program: adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia-94 trial. Cancer 109 (10): 2058-67, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract]

Tavernier E, Boiron JM, Huguet F, et al.: Outcome of treatment after first relapse in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia initially treated by the LALA-94 trial. Leukemia 21 (9): 1907-14, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract]

Vey N, Thomas X, Picard C, et al.: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation improves the outcome of adults with t(1;19)/E2A-PBX1 and t(4;11)/MLL-AF4 positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the prospective multicenter LALA-94 study. Leukemia 20 (12): 2155-61, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract]

Asnafi V, Buzyn A, Thomas X, et al.: Impact of TCR status and genotype on outcome in adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a LALA-94 study. Blood 105 (8): 3072-8, 2005.[PUBMED Abstract]

Thomas X, Boiron JM, Huguet F, et al.: Outcome of treatment in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: analysis of the LALA-94 trial. J Clin Oncol 22 (20): 4075-86, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract]

Asnafi V, Buzyn A, Thomas X, et al.: Impact of immunophenotype and genotype on outcome in LALA94 T-ALLs: toward risk adapted stratification of adult T-ALL. [Abstract] Blood 102 (11): A-67, 2003.

Dombret H, Gabert J, Boiron JM, et al.: Outcome of treatment in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia--results of the prospective multicenter LALA-94 trial. Blood 100 (7): 2357-66, 2002.[PUBMED Abstract]

Related Publications

Reman O, Pigneux A, Huguet F, et al.: Central nervous system involvement in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at diagnosis and/or at first elapse: results from the GET-LALA group. [Abstract] Blood 110 (11): A-4326, 2007.

Tavernier E, Le QH, de Botton S, et al.: Secondary or concomitant neoplasms among adults diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and treated according to the LALA-87 and LALA-94 trials. Cancer 110 (12): 2747-55, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract]

Dhédin N, Dombret H, Thomas X, et al.: Autologous stem cell transplantation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission: analysis of the LALA-85, -87 and -94 trials. Leukemia 20 (2): 336-44, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract]

Picard C, Hayette S, Bilhou-Nabera C, et al.: Prospective multicentric molecular study for poor prognosis fusion transcripts at diagnosis in adult B-lineage ALL patients: the LALA 94 experience. Leukemia 20 (12): 2178-81, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract]

Charrin C, Thomas X, Ffrench M, et al.: A report from the LALA-94 and LALA-SA groups on hypodiploidy with 30 to 39 chromosomes and near-triploidy: 2 possible expressions of a sole entity conferring poor prognosis in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Blood 104 (8): 2444-51, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract]

Boissel N, Auclerc MF, Lhéritier V, et al.: Should adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia be treated as old children or young adults? Comparison of the French FRALLE-93 and LALA-94 trials. J Clin Oncol 21 (5): 774-80, 2003.[PUBMED Abstract]

Trial Contact Information

Trial Lead Organizations

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

Roel Willemze, MD, PhD, Protocol chair
Ph: 31-71-526-2267
Email: R.Willemze@lumc.nl

Acute Leukemia French Association

Denis Fiere, MD, Protocol chair

Registry Information
Official Title A RANDOMIZED PHASE III TRIAL COMPARING DEXAMETHASONE WITH PREDNISONE IN INDUCTION TREATMENT AND BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION WITH INTENSIVE MAINTENANCE TREATMENT IN ADOLESCENT AND ADULT ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA (ALL-4)
Trial Start Date 1995-08-25
Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00002700
Date Submitted to PDQ 1995-08-25
Information Last Verified 2007-12-06

Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol.

Back to TopBack to Top

A Service of the National Cancer Institute
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health USA.gov