| Randomized Study of Heparin Versus Minocycline Hydrochloride and Edetate Calcium Disodium (M-EDTA) for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections and Occlusions in Patients at High Risk for a Catheter-Related Infection
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Heparin or M-EDTA in Preventing Catheter-Related Infections and Blockages in Patients at High Risk for a Catheter-Related Infection
Basic Trial Information
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Protocol IDs |
|---|
| No phase specified | Supportive care | Completed | Any age | MDA-ID-93004 MDA ID93-004, NCT00378781 |
Objectives Primary - Compare the incidence of catheter-related infections (Staphylococcal and Candida) in patients at high risk for a catheter-related infection treated with heparin vs minocycline hydrochloride and edetate calcium disodium (M-EDTA).
Secondary - Compare the incidence of catheter occlusions in patients treated with these regimens.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- At high risk of acquiring a catheter infection, as evidenced by any of the following:
- Diagnosis of leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, or melanoma-sarcoma
- Undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- Receiving aldesleukin
- Pediatric cancer patients
- New (≤ 10 days old) functioning externalized tunneled or nontunneled central venous catheter (CVC), such as a Hickman/Broviac or Hohn catheter, or peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) utilized for infusion of chemotherapy, blood and blood products, or other intermittent infusions
- No occluded CVC
- No existing local or systemic catheter infection
- More than 3 days since removal of a prior CVC due to an infection
- No externalized CVC that is projected to remain in place for < 2 weeks
- No infusion ports or Groshong catheters
- No coated CVC impregnated with an antimicrobial or antiseptic agent
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
Patient Characteristics:
- Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
- No history of allergy to any tetracycline
- No contraindication to flush solution dwell time of ≥ 4 hours
- No hypocalcemia while receiving calcium supplementation through the catheter
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
Expected Enrollment 150A total of 150 patients will be accrued for this study. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Incidence of catheter-related infections during the study period (3 months)
Secondary Outcome(s)Incidence of catheter occlusions during periods of prophylaxis (e.g., time period in which the catheter is locked with heparin or minocycline hydrochloride and edetate calcium disodium [M-EDTA])
Outline This is a randomized, double-blind, prospective, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to type of catheter (tunneled central venous catheter [CVC] vs nontunneled percutaneous CVC) and participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients receive minocycline hydrochloride and edetate calcium disodium (M-EDTA) flush solution into the CVC once daily.
- Arm II: Patients receive heparin flush solution into the CVC once daily.
Treatment in both arms continues for up to 3 months in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or until the removal of the catheter.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations M. D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas  |  |  | | Jorge Cortes, MD, Principal investigator |  | |  |
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Heparin and Minocycline-EDTA Flush for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections and Occlusions |  | | Trial Completion Date | | 2007-12-28 |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00378781 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2006-07-31 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2007-09-30 |  | | NCI Grant/Contract Number | | CA16672 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |