| Phase III Randomized Study of Caspofungin Acetate Versus Amphotericin B Liposomal in Patients With Persistent Fever and Neutropenia Following Treatment for Cancer
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outline Published Results Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Caspofungin Acetate Compared With Amphotericin B Liposomal in Treating Patients With Persistent Fever and Neutropenia Following Cancer Treatment
Basic Trial Information
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Protocol IDs |
|---|
| Phase III | Supportive care | Completed | 16 and over | MSKCC-00085 MERCK-026-01, NCI-G00-1898, NCT00008359 |
Objectives - Compare the number of successful treatment outcomes among patients treated with caspofungin acetate vs amphotericin B liposomal for persistent fever and neutropenia following cancer therapy, in terms of survival for 7 days after study drug, resolution of fever, treatment of any baseline fungal infection, absence of breakthrough fungal infection during and for 7 days after study drug, and absence of study drug discontinuation due to toxicity or lack of efficacy.
- Compare the incidence of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the incidence of infusion-related adverse events within 1 hour of the infusion in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the incidence of treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse events, frequency of drug-related events, number of breakthrough fungal infections, and number of successfully treated baseline fungal infections in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare incidence of required dose increase due to inadequate clinical response in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the time to resolution of fever in patients treated with these regimens.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Leukemia, lymphoma, or other cancer that has been previously treated with
chemotherapy or bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
- Absolute neutrophil count less than 500/mm3 for past 96 hours and not
expected to recover in next 48 hours
- Received at least 96 hours of parenteral systemic antibacterial therapy
- Fever greater than 38.0 degrees Celsius
- Adequately managed bacterial infection allowed if all of the following
are
true:
- Negative blood cultures
- Received at least 5 days of antibiotics to which any
bacterial isolates are sensitive
- Surgical drainage of any abscess fluid or surgical
debridement of infected
tissues
- Removal of infected catheters
- No invasive fungal infection
- Not previously enrolled on this study
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy: - See Disease Characteristics
Chemotherapy: - See Disease Characteristics
- No concurrent investigational antineoplastic therapy
Endocrine therapy: Radiotherapy: Surgery: Other: - At least 10 days since prior parenteral amphotericin B
- At least 14 days since prior investigational antibiotic,
antifungal, or immunosuppressive drug
- No concurrent rifampin or cyclosporine
- No other concurrent investigational antibiotic, antifungal,
or immunosuppressive drug
- No concurrent alcohol
Patient Characteristics:
Age: Performance status: Life expectancy: Hematopoietic: - Platelet count at least 5,000/mm3
- INR no greater than 1.6 (no greater than 4.0 if receiving
anticoagulants)
Hepatic: - Bilirubin no greater than 3 times upper limit of normal
(ULN)
- AST or ALT no greater than 5 times ULN
- Alkaline phosphatase no greater than 3 times ULN
- No acute hepatitis or cirrhosis
Renal: Other: - Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective barrier
contraception
- No allergy, hypersensitivity, or prior serious reaction to any
echinocandin antifungal or amphotericin B formulation
- No other condition or illness that would preclude
study participation
Expected Enrollment A total of 1060 patients (530 per arm) will be accrued for this study. Outline This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter
study. Patients are stratified according to high-risk (prior allogeneic bone
marrow transplantation or prior chemotherapy for relapse of acute leukemia) vs
low-risk and prior prophylactic antifungal therapy during chemotherapy (yes vs
no). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients receive caspofungin acetate IV over 1 hour followed by
placebo IV over 2 hours.
- Arm II: Patients receive placebo IV over 1 hour followed by
amphotericin B liposomal IV over 2 hours.
Treatment repeats daily for up to 28 days in the absence of disease
progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed at 7 and 14 days after study drug
discontinuation. Published ResultsWalsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, et al.: Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med 351 (14): 1391-402, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract]
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center  |  |  | | Kent Sepkowitz, MD, Protocol chair |  | | Ph: 212-639-2441; 800-525-2225 |
|  |
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparative Study To Evaluate The Safety, Tolerability, And Efficacy Of MK-0991 Versus (Amphotericin B) Liposome For Injection As Empirical Therapy In Patients With Persistent Fever And Neutropenia |  | | Trial Start Date | | 2000-08-22 |  | | Trial Completion Date | | 2003-03-11 |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00008359 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2000-11-21 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2009-12-02 |  | | NCI Grant/Contract Number | | CA08748 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |