| Phase III Randomized Study of Megestrol Versus Eicosapentaenoic Acid-Enriched Nutritional Supplement Versus Both in Patients With Cancer-Related Cachexia and Anorexia
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outline Published Results Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Comparison of Megestrol and/or Omega-3 Fatty Acid-Enriched Nutritional Supplement in Treating Patients With Cancer-Related Weight Loss and Lack of Appetite
Basic Trial Information
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Protocol IDs |
|---|
| Phase III | Supportive care | Completed | 18 and over | NCCTG-989255 CAN-NCIC-SC18, NCI-P02-0205, NCT00031707, SC18 |
Objectives - Compare the appetite-stimulating properties of megestrol vs an eicosapentaenoic acid-enriched nutritional supplement vs both, in terms of patient weight, rate of weight change, and appetite, in patients with cancer-related cachexia and anorexia.
- Determine the effect of these regimens on nausea and vomiting in these patients.
- Assess quality of life in patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Correlate interleukin-6 concentration changes with appetite and weight changes in patients treated with these regimens.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Histologically or cytologically proven cancer other than brain, breast,
ovarian, endometrial, or prostate cancer
- Compelling clinical evidence of cancer is allowed
when tissue sample is
unobtainable
- Considered incurable with available therapies
- At least 5 pounds weight loss within the past 2 months (excluding
perioperative weight loss) and/or have estimated caloric intake of less
than
20 cal/kg daily
- Weight loss must be perceived as a problem by the patient
- Potential weight gain must be considered beneficial by the attending
physician
- No history of primary brain cancer or brain metastases
- No clinical evidence of ascites
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy: Chemotherapy: - Concurrent chemotherapy allowed
Endocrine therapy: - At least 1 month since prior adrenal steroids, androgens,
progestational agents, or appetite stimulants (e.g., dronabinol)
- No concurrent adrenal steroids, androgens, other
progestational agents, or appetite stimulants (e.g., dronabinol)
- Inhalant, topical, or optical steroids allowed
- Short-term dexamethasone as an anti-emetic during
chemotherapy allowed
Radiotherapy: - Concurrent radiotherapy allowed
Surgery: Other: - No tube feedings or parenteral nutrition
Patient Characteristics:
Age: Performance status: Life expectancy: Hematopoietic: Hepatic: Renal: Cardiovascular: - No poorly controlled congestive heart failure
- No poorly controlled hypertension
- No history of thromboembolic disease
Other: - Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- Alert and mentally competent
- Able to reliably take oral medication
- No known mechanical obstruction of the alimentary tract,
malabsorption, or intractable vomiting (more than 5 episodes per
week)
- No diabetes requiring insulin
- Diabetes requiring an oral hypoglycemic agent or diet control
allowed
Expected Enrollment A total of 450 patients (150 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study
within 15 months. Outline This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter
study. Patients are stratified according to primary cancer (lung vs
gastrointestinal vs other), severity of weight loss in the past 2 months (less
than 10 pounds vs 10 pounds or more), planned concurrent chemotherapy (yes vs
no), age (under 50 vs 50 and over), and prognosis (good vs bad vs unsure).
Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients receive oral megestrol once daily and oral placebo
twice daily.
- Arm II: Patients receive oral placebo once daily and an
eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)-enriched nutritional supplement twice daily.
- Arm III: Patients receive oral megestrol once daily and an EPA-enriched
nutritional supplement twice daily.
Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity and as long
as the patient and physician feel it is beneficial. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, weekly for 1 month, and then
monthly thereafter during study treatment. Patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years. Published ResultsJatoi A, Rowland K, Loprinzi CL, et al.: An eicosapentaenoic acid supplement versus megestrol acetate versus both for patients with cancer-associated wasting: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group and National Cancer Institute of Canada collaborative effort. J Clin Oncol 22 (12): 2469-76, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract] Jatoi A, Rowland KM, Loprinzi CL, et al.: An eicosapentainoic acid (EPA)-enriched supplement versus megestrol acetate (MA) versus both for patients with cancer-associated wasting. A collaborative effort from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) and the National Cancer Institute of Canada. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-2987, 743, 2003.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations North Central Cancer Treatment Group  |  |  | | Aminah Jatoi, MD, Protocol chair |  | |  |
NCIC-Clinical Trials Group  |  |  | | Neil MacDonald, MD, FRCPC, Protocol chair |  | |  |
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | Phase III Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Comparison of Megestrol Acetate (Megace) Versus an N-3 Fatty Acid (EPA) Enriched Nutritional Supplement Versus Both for the Treatment of Cancer Cachexia and Anorexia |  | | Trial Start Date | | 2000-03-31 |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00031707 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2002-01-09 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2007-11-23 |  | | NCI Grant/Contract Number | | CA31946 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |