In English | En español
Questions About Cancer? 1-800-4-CANCER

Clinical Trials (PDQ®)

Page Options

  • Print This Page
  • Email This Document
Clinical Trial Questions?
Get Help:
1-800-4-CANCER
LiveHelp online chat

Clinical Trials (PDQ®)

Ketamine Hydrochloride and Best Pain Management in Treating Cancer Patients With Neuropathic Pain

Basic Trial Information
Trial Description
     Summary
     Further Trial Information
     Eligibility Criteria
Trial Contact Information

Basic Trial Information

PhaseTypeStatusAgeSponsorProtocol IDs
Phase IIIBiomarker/Laboratory analysis, Supportive careActive18 and overOtherCDR0000696704
CRUK-KPS-2008-01, EU-21012, EUDRACT-2007-002080-27, ISRCTN-49116945, NCT01316744

Trial Description

Summary

RATIONALE: Ketamine hydrochloride may lessen neuropathic pain in patients with cancer. It is not yet known whether ketamine hydrochloride given together with the best pain management is more effective than a placebo given together with the best pain management in treating neuropathic pain in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying ketamine hydrochloride given together with the best pain management to see how well it works compared with giving a placebo together with the best pain management in treating cancer patients with neuropathic pain.

Further Study Information

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To determine whether ketamine hydrochloride given in addition to best standard pain management improves malignant neuropathic pain compared to best standard pain management alone in patients with cancer.

Secondary

  • To compare initial treatment benefit (at day 4 of assessment period of 16 days) using the sensory component of the McGill Short-Form Questionnaire.
  • To compare difference in overall pain between the study arms based on the pain-intensity visual-analogue score (VAS).
  • To compare difference in neuropathic pain between the study arms based on the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale.
  • To assess worst pain score (index neuropathic site) between the two arms.
  • To compare patient distress between the two arms based on NCCN Distress Thermometer.
  • To assess the side effects and tolerability of trial drug.
  • To assess the effect of intervention on quality of life scores (based on Euroqol thermometer), anxiety and depression (based on HADS), and opioid requirements.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

  • Stage 1 (Run-in Period): Opioid doses are optimized, under a defined schedule, for up to a maximum of 10 days to ensure that all patients are on an optimized and stable regimen* prior to randomization. Following the run-in-period, patients undergo reassessment. Patients who have improved pain scores (i.e., < 4/10 on the visual-analogue score in the past 24 hours or < 5 McGill Sensory Scale Score) are taken off the study. Patients whose scores have not improved continue on to Stage 2 of the study.

NOTE: *Stable regimen is defined as the same dose of controlled release and no more variation than 2 breakthrough opioid doses over the normal for that patient for a period of 48 hours.

  • Stage 2 (Titration Period): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
  • Arm I: Patients receive oral ketamine hydrochloride 4 times a day. Doses are titrated until when analgesia is achieved or individual side effects appear, for up to 14 days.
  • Arm II: Patients receive an oral placebo 4 times a day. Doses are titrated until when analgesia is achieved or individual side effects appear, for up to 14 days.
  • Stage 3 (Assessment Period): Patients receive the trial medication (i.e., ketamine hydrochloride or placebo) at the fixed optimum dose (reached during the titration period) for 16 days.

Patients are allowed to receive breakthrough opioids at any time during the study.

Patients complete quality-of-life and pain-assessment questionnaires periodically. Some patients may undergo blood sample collection periodically for pharmacogenomics studies at a later date.

Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.

Eligibility Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed cancer
  • Index neuropathic pain ≥ 4 on 0-10 (as defined by Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs) that is related to underlying malignancy or resulting from treatment received for this malignancy
  • McGill Sensory Scale Score > 5
  • Received a trial of an adjuvant analgesic (gabapentin or amitriptyline or both)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Life expectancy ≥ 2 months
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • Able to comply with study procedures
  • Diastolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mm Hg at screening
  • No seizures in past 2 years
  • Not actively hallucinating
  • No cerebrovascular disease (strokes)
  • No psychotic disorders or cognitive impairment

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • At least 6 weeks since prior and no concurrent chemotherapy or radiotherapy that is likely to affect neuropathic pain
  • No change in tumoricidal treatment during the period of the study that is likely to alter pain during the course of the study
  • No concurrent class I antiarrhythmic drugs

Trial Contact Information

Trial Lead Organizations/Sponsors

University of Glasgow

Marie T. FallonPrincipal Investigator

Barry J.A. LairdPrincipal Investigator

Trial Sites

United Kingdom
England
  London
 Royal Brompton Hospital
 Contact Person Ph: 44-207-886-6011
  Email: c.urch@ucl.ac.uk
Scotland
  Edinburgh
 Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
 Contact Person Ph: 44-131-777-3520
  Email: marie.fallon@ed.ac.uk
  Glasgow
 Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
 Contact Person Ph: 44-141-301-7033
  Email: john.welsh@ggc.scot.nhs.uk

Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
NLM Identifer NCT01316744
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on October 20, 2014

Note: Information about this trial is from the ClinicalTrials.gov database. The versions designated for health professionals and patients contain the same text. Minor changes may be made to the ClinicalTrials.gov record to standardize the names of study sponsors, sites, and contacts. Cancer.gov only lists sites that are recruiting patients for active trials, whereas ClinicalTrials.gov lists all sites for all trials. Questions and comments regarding the presented information should be directed to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Back to TopBack to Top