 |
|
 |


Mouse Hepatitis Virus at NCI-Frederick
An outbreak of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) has been identified in animals from the Animal Production Area (APA) at NCI-Frederick. On Jan. 30, the University of Missouri diagnostic lab informed APA staff that some mice sent from Building 1029 on Jan. 23 for routine testing were showing borderline
antibody levels to MHV. On Feb. 2, additional animals were sent from Building 1029 to the Animal Health Diagnostic Laboratory (AHDL) where antibodies to MHV were detected in the sera. All previous routine testing for MHV had been negative.
Building 1029 was immediately quarantined and all shipments stopped. The building has since been depopulated and is being decontaminated. The building housed DBA/2NCr, BALB/cAnNCr, C3H/HeNCr MTV-, Sencar A/PtCr, and CD2F1Cr mice. Mice from Building 1029 had been distributed to numerous animal facilities on both the Frederick and NIH campuses as well as to other organizations throughout the United States.
Read more 1



Helping Every Smoker Who Would Like to Quit
Last week, at a press conference attended by Surgeon General Richard Carmona, CDC Director Julie Gerberding, and me, HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson affirmed his strong opposition to tobacco and announced plans to take
another important step in the ongoing effort to address the burden of tobacco use in this country. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will co-fund the implementation of a national
network of smoking cessation quitlines. This network will provide all smokers in the United States with access to the support and the most up-to-date information they need to quit.
Adult smoking rates have been cut nearly in half since the Surgeon General first recognized cigarette smoking as a cause of cancer and other serious diseases 40 years ago. Unfortunately,
46 million adults in this country continue to smoke today, and tobacco use remains the number one preventable cause of premature death in the nation.
Read more 2
 |
This NCI Cancer Bulletin is produced by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). NCI, which was established in 1937, leads a national effort to eliminate the suffering and death due to cancer. Through basic and clinical biomedical research and training, NCI conducts and supports research that will lead to a future in which we can prevent cancer before it starts, identify cancers that do develop at the earliest stage, eliminate cancers through innovative treatment interventions, and biologically control those cancers that we cannot eliminate so they become manageable, chronic diseases.

For more information on cancer, call 1-800-4-CANCER or visit http://www.cancer.gov.

NCI Cancer Bulletin staff can be reached at ncicancerbulletin@mail.nih.gov.
|
|
 |
 |

Mouse Hepatitis Virus at NCI-Frederick
An outbreak of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) has been identified in animals from the Animal Production Area (APA) at NCI-Frederick. On Jan. 30, the University of Missouri diagnostic lab informed APA staff that some mice sent from Building 1029 on Jan. 23 for routine testing were showing borderline
antibody levels to MHV. On Feb. 2, additional animals were sent from Building 1029 to the Animal Health Diagnostic Laboratory (AHDL) where antibodies to MHV were detected in the sera. All previous routine testing for MHV had been negative.
Building 1029 was immediately quarantined and all shipments stopped. The building has since been depopulated and is being decontaminated. The building housed DBA/2NCr, BALB/cAnNCr, C3H/HeNCr MTV-, Sencar A/PtCr, and CD2F1Cr mice. Mice from Building 1029 had been distributed to numerous animal facilities on both the Frederick and NIH campuses as well as to other organizations throughout the United States.
All 25 known strains of MHV are highly contagious within mouse colonies and easily transmitted in feces and by direct contact, aerosol, and fomites. An MHV infection typically runs its course in immunocompetent mice within three weeks. However,
immunocompromised mice tend to develop chronic infections, sometimes leading to death.
By the end of the day on Feb. 4, all organizations that had received mice from Building 1029 since Dec. 15, 2003, had been notified of the MHV outbreak. All NCI investigators who received mice from Building 1029 were notified by the animal facility managers that they might have received MHV-positive animals. NIH facility veterinarians who had received animals from Building 1029 were also notified of the outbreak. On Feb. 6, all recipients of APA animals, even those who did not receive animals from Building 1029, were notified of the outbreak.
All rooms in NCI facilities that
received mice from Building 1029
have been quarantined, and all shipments
to and from these NCI animal
facilities have been stopped. Mice
that were received from Building
1029 from Dec. 1, 2003, to Feb. 2,
2004, were removed to AHDL and
tested for the presence of antibody
to MHV. Serologic tests from these
mice confirmed the presence of antibody
to MHV in some mice that had
been shipped from Building 1029 to
the NCI animal facilities. Additional
mice testing is being conducted to
determine the extent of the outbreak
and/or whether containment efforts
have been successful.
Investigators should be aware that all
tissues taken from mice obtained from
or in contact with mice from Building
1029 should be tested for the presence
of MHV prior to distribution or reintroduction
into any NIH animal facility.
If you have any questions regarding the
MHV investigation please call Dr. Rick
Bedigian, director, Laboratory Animal
Sciences Program, at (301) 846-1542.
|
 |
 |

Helping Every Smoker Who Would Like to Quit
Last week, at a press conference attended by Surgeon General Richard Carmona, CDC Director Julie Gerberding, and me, HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson affirmed his strong opposition to tobacco and announced plans to take
another important step in the ongoing effort to address the burden of tobacco use in this country. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will co-fund the implementation of a national
network of smoking cessation quitlines. This network will provide all smokers in the United States with access to the support and the most up-to-date information they need to quit.
Adult smoking rates have been cut nearly in half since the Surgeon General first recognized cigarette smoking as a cause of cancer and other serious diseases 40 years ago. Unfortunately,
46 million adults in this country continue to smoke today, and tobacco use remains the number one preventable cause of premature death in the nation.
While nearly three out of four smokers in the United States say they want to quit, sustained success rates for people who try to quit are abysmally low. Fortunately, we now have evidence-based interventions,
including telephone counseling and FDA-approved medications, that can significantly increase success rates for people who attempt to quit.
Currently, 38 states have telephone quitlines that deliver information, advice, support, and referrals to smokers, regardless of their geographic location, race, ethnicity, or economic status. Scientific evidence has shown that quitlines are especially useful for people without access to other cessation
treatments, and they can be effective supplements for people who use other methods to quit.
As soon as possible, NCI will establish a new, easy-to-remember, toll-free telephone number that will serve as a
single access point to the national network of quitlines. States that currently have quitlines will receive increased
funding from CDC to enhance their services. These states will be able to use their supplements to expand hours
of operation, hire bilingual counselors, build referral linkages with local health care systems, or promote their quitline.
States that do not have quitlines yet will receive grants to establish one.
Making quitline services accessible
across the country was a key recommendation
of the smoking cessation
subcommittee of the Interagency
Committee on Smoking and Health -
a group that Secretary Thompson
created and charged with providing
recommendations, based on expert
and public opinion, to focus the
government's cessation efforts.
The North American Quitline Consortium -
which was formed last year
by leaders in state, provincial, and federal
health departments, quitline vendors,
and national organizations in the
United States and Canada to identify
ways to improve quitline operations,
promotion, and effectiveness - will
serve as a valuable resource for the
new national network. We are completely
committed to working closely
with our partners in the consortium,
such as the American Cancer Society
and the American Legacy Foundation,
to ensure that the national network of
quitlines will help all smokers quit.
Interested smokers can get the help
they need right now from NCI. The
NCI Cancer Information Service
(CIS) has more than 20 years of
experience providing help to smokers
trying to quit. Cessation resources
available include:
- http://smokefree.gov, a Web site
that provides access to quitline
numbers currently offered by individual
states and NCI, an online
guide to quitting, and downloadable
cessation guides
- NCI's smoking cessation quitline,
staffed by trained cessation counselors
(call 1-877-44U-QUIT or
TTY at 1-800-332-8615)
- print materials, including the
booklet Clearing the Air and several
fact sheets about smoking and
secondhand smoke
In addition, people who contact the
CIS at 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-
6237) can speak with a trained information
specialist about smoking and
cancer and can listen to recorded messages
about the risks of smoking and
tips on quitting. The services of the
CIS are supplemented by a real-time,
instant messaging site called LiveHelp,
where people can "converse" online
with an information specialist.
I encourage you to share this information
with the smokers that you
know, as quitting is one of the most
important things they can do for
their health. This is an important step
forward in our efforts to eliminate
suffering and death due to cancer.
Andrew C. von Eschenbach, M.D.
Director, National Cancer Institute
|
 |
 |
Estimating Cancer Risk from X-Rays
Using a new calculation to estimate
the risk of cancer from exposure to
diagnostic X-rays, Amy Berrington
de González, of the University of
Oxford, United Kingdom, and Sarah
Darby, of Cancer Research UK, suggested
in a recent article that in the
UK around 700 of the 124,000 cases
of cancer diagnosed annually could
be attributable to exposure to diagnostic
X-rays. The article appeared in
the Jan. 31, 2004, issue of The Lancet.
The authors' estimate of around 700
additional cancer cases annually in
the UK is equivalent to a cumulative
risk of cancer to age 75 years of about
0.6 percent. That number rises to 3
percent in Japan, they calculated, the
country with the highest estimated
annual X-ray use in the world.
Berrington de González and Darby
concluded that, "[a]lthough there are
clear benefits from the use of diagnostic
X-rays, that their use involves some risk
of cancer is generally acknowledged.
We provide detailed estimates of these
risks." Because some of their calculations
depended on assumptions, the
results were somewhat uncertain.
Peter Herzog and Christina Rieger from
Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich,
Germany, stated in an accompanying
commentary, "Berrington de González
and Darby did not assess the indications
or benefits achieved for patients in Xray
examinations. Benefits include the
earlier detection of cancers by radiological
examinations and the possibility of
early treatment, which probably allows
more cure of cancers than radiological
exposure is able to cause."
Radiation Epidemiology Short Course and Lecture Series
Under the direction of Dr. Peter Inskip,
NCI's Radiation Epidemiology Branch
(in the Division of Cancer Epidemiology
and Genetics) will offer a short course
from May 4 to 14 on a variety of topics
in radiation epidemiology. Speakers
include NCI staff and scientists from
other government agencies and academic
institutions. The course is intended for
those who have epidemiology backgrounds
and are interested in the health
effects of exposure to radiation, particularly
the relationship between ionizing
radiation and cancer. The course is free
but advance registration is required.
The program offers an overview of
the radiation epidemiology field, with
a focus on radiation-related cancer. It
begins with basic radiation physics,
dosimetry, radiation chemistry, and
radiobiology and continues with presentations
on epidemiologic studies of
radiation-exposed populations, including
atomic bomb survivors in Japan,
medically irradiated populations, and
persons with occupational or environmental
radiation exposures. Methods
for quantifying radiation risks, the use
of such information in setting radiation
protection standards, and risk communication
also will be discussed. The
course focuses on ionizing radiation
but also considers nonionizing radiation.
Throughout the course, instructors
will stress the importance of radiation
dosimetry in epidemiologic studies
and highlight key methodologic issues,
including challenges in the study of
low-dose effects. Possible new sources
of radiation exposure and their potential
risks will be covered.
For more information on the Radiation
Epidemiology Course, please visit
http://dceg.cancer.gov/epicourse.html.
NCI to Put Partial-Breast Irradiation to the Test
A clinical trial of partial-breast irradiation
(PBI), slated to start in late
summer 2004, will test whether this
technique is equivalent to radiation
treatment of the whole breast.
For early-stage breast cancer, lumpectomy
followed by whole-breast irradiation
(WBI) is an alternative to mastectomy.
But it took 20 years of follow-up data to
establish the scientific basis for lumpectomy.
Now, PBI must be tested with
similar scientific rigor. PBI often involves
approximately one week of radiation
treatment vs. six weeks of daily radiation
for WBI. Since traveling to treatment
may be a hardship for some women,
the shorter duration of PBI is appealing.
"Many women are seeking out this
treatment," said Dr. Paul Wallner of
NCI's Radiation Research Program,
especially since the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approved a PBI
device in 2002. The FDA, which based
its decision on a study involving 25
women, declared the apparatus safe.
The agency did not comment on the efficacy of PBI for treating breast cancer.
"We still don't know what types of patients
are best suited to PBI, how much
radiation to use, how much breast tissue
to target, or if the end results will be
equivalent to WBI," said Dr. Wallner.
In the Feb. 4, 2004, Journal of the
National Cancer Institute, Dr. Wallner
and colleagues detail issues that
need to be addressed before PBI can
become standard practice. A clinical
trial dealing with these issues will be
sponsored by NCI's Cancer Therapy
Evaluation Program. Dr. Frank Vicini,
of Michigan's William Beaumont
Hospital, will head the multisite, 2.5-year study of 3,000 women.
|
 |
 |

Phase II Prostate Trials Use Pre-Prostatectomy Study Design to Identify Promising Prevention Agents and Biomarkers
A short window of opportunity
between the histologic diagnosis of
prostate cancer and definitive treatment
(prostatectomy) is being used
in several phase II prostate cancer
trials to identify promising prevention
agents and biomarker end points.
The goal is to obtain key information
about the effects of novel study agents
on intermediate end point biomarkers
(IEBs) and about the distribution of
the agent in prostate tissue.
Because prostate cancer has a long
natural history, IEBs such as serum
markers (e.g., prostate-specific antigen
[PSA]), histopathological markers,
or tissue-based markers are used to
find preliminary evidence of efficacy
or biologic activity in phase II trials.
Evaluation of these agents may lead to
the next generation of phase III chemoprevention
trials for prostate cancer.
In this "pre-prostatectomy" trial design,
men with early-stage prostate cancer
are randomly assigned to receive the
study agent or placebo for about 3 to
6 weeks between a diagnostic biopsy
and a prostatectomy. Investigators
have direct access to prostatic tissue
from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies and the entire gland
following surgery, to systematically
assess the biologic activity of agents
in the target organ.
This clinical model has the advantage
of allowing rapid screening of agents
in relatively small, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trials with 60
subjects or less and that are conducted
within the standard of care of patients
scheduled for radical prostatectomy,
according to Dr. Ronald Lieberman,
program director in NCI's Division
of Cancer Prevention (DCP) Prostate
and Urologic Cancer Research Group.
A variety of agents are being tested
with this phase II trial design, including
androgen receptor antagonists, antiinflammatory
agents (selective COX-2
inhibitors), vitamin D analogs, and
micronutrient antioxidants. (See table.)
"The phase II pre-prostatectomy
cancer prevention trials are a practical
and efficient way to determine
whether the chemopreventive agent
concentrates in a man's prostate and
has a biologic effect there. This is an
important step in selecting agents
for more definitive prostate cancer
prevention trials," said DCP director
Dr. Peter Greenwald.
One of these studies, for example, uses
high-grade prostatic intraepithelial
neoplasia (HGPIN) as a primary end
point for toremifene.
Since
there is growing
evidence
that estrogens
play a role in
the development
of prostate
cancer,
this study is
evaluating the
effects of toremifene,
a selective estrogen receptor
modulator. The trial is comparing
the percent of HGPIN present in the
radical prostatectomy tissue of patients
with stage I or II adenocarcinoma of
the prostate who were treated with
toremifene orally once a day for up to
6 weeks, against the tissue of patients
who received observation alone prior
to prostatectomy.
Toremifene is the lead chemopreventive
agent being developed by GTx,
Inc., a Tennessee-based biotechnology
company that focuses on men's
health issues and is collaborating with
DCP on this phase II study. Dr. Joel
Nelson, principal investigator for the
toremifene study at Hillman Cancer
Center at the University of Pittsburgh
Cancer Institute, noted that studies
using this trial design are examining
human tissues after defined exposure
to a chemopreventive agent. The 4-week to 8-week lag time from diagnosis
of prostate cancer until surgery
provides a "unique window of opportunity
to examine alterations in the
prostate after exposure," he said.
Assuming that a chemopreventive
agent will induce alterations after
short exposure, the strategy is to
identify those alterations and extrapolate
to a longer exposure, according to
Dr. Nelson. This is significantly easier
and more cost effective, particularly
in this case when there are so many
compelling chemopreventive agents.
But the challenges of the model, using
alterations in tissues as evidence for
chemoprevention, remain unproven,
he noted. The studies are clearly
hypothesis generating, yet they must
start somewhere, he stressed.
Dr. Jeri Kim, assistant professor in the
Department of Genitourinary Medical
Oncology at The University of Texas M.
D. Anderson Cancer Center, completed
the first phase II trial using this model
to study selenium and vitamin E, recruiting
48 patients in 18 months. (See "A conversation with… 3.") The trial used
the same regimen currently being used
in the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer
Prevention Trial (SELECT) to see if
researchers could identify potential
surrogate end point biomarkers in that
large study. The analysis is still ongoing.
Dr. Lieberman noted that the preprostatectomy
clinical model provides
a way to evaluate both the structure/
anatomy of the epithelial compartments
(i.e., normal, precancer, and
cancer) and the biology/function
(specifically, the interface between the
epithelium and stroma), which in turn
allows investigators to assess the cellular,
molecular, and biochemical effects
of the experimental agent.
"Furthermore, effects on biomarker
modulation can be correlated with
changes in histology, proliferation,
apoptosis, angiogenesis, and specific
molecular targets related to the presumptive
mechanism of action(s) of
the agent," Dr. Lieberman added.
Evaluating agents for prostate cancer
prevention is a major DCP research
focus. For instance, the SELECT
study has been enrolling a record
number of participants to determine
if these two dietary supplements can
protect against the clinical diagnosis
of prostate cancer and the phase III
Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
(PCPT) has shown that finasteride
can reduce the chances of getting
prostate cancer by nearly 25 percent.
|
 |
 |
A Conversation with Dr. Jeri Kim
Assistant Professor in the Department of Genitourinary Medical
Oncology at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
What makes this group of studies important to the broader
research effort aimed at prostate cancer prevention?
The pre-prostatectomy model is important in studying the biological
effects of chemopreventive agents in tissue. We have access to the entire
organ and therefore the ability to study in detail the effects of a drug in
different zones (areas) of the prostate. We can also study differential effects
of a drug in normal tissue, in prostate intraepithelial neoplasia, and
in prostate cancer. Since most prostate cancer occurs in the peripheral
zone of the prostate, we are interested in effects there. If a drug of interest
has no effect in the peripheral zone, it may not be useful.
How would you describe the novelty of searching for cancer
prevention agents using the pre-prostatectomy model?
We are using the pre-prostatectomy model to study the biological effects
of such agents as selenium and vitamin E to complement the national
effort already under way to determine whether these agents can prevent
prostate cancer. In this process, we will not only confirm the known
mechanisms of action of these agents in prostate tissue, but we will also
discover new mechanisms of action that may serve as new targets for
chemoprevention or therapy for prostate cancer. Additionally, there needs
to be a close collaboration among investigators from the laboratory and
the clinic so new insights gained from in vitro and in vivo studies can be
confirmed in the clinic and the questions raised from the clinic can be
investigated in the laboratory.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this
pre-prostatectomy cohort for studying novel agents such as
selenium and vitamin E?
I think the major advantage, as mentioned, is the fact that we have access
to the entire organ for correlative studies. On the other hand, there are
disadvantages. Recruiting patients to a pre-postatectomy study using
chemopreventive agents is difficult because patients who already have
prostate cancer may not directly benefit from these agents and may be
reluctant to participate in the study. Also, because chemoprevention
studies in prostate cancer use biopsy as an end point (just as in the Prostate
Cancer Prevention Trial, or PCPT), biomarkers studied in sections
of the prostatectomy specimen will be compared with biopsy specimens
of the prostate.
|
 |
 |

Breast Imaging Study
Name of the Trial
Pilot Screening Study of Breast Imaging Outcome Measures in Women at High Genetic Risk of Breast Cancer
(NCI-01-C-0009). See the protocol summary at http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/NCI-01-C-0009.
Principal Investigator
Dr. Sheila Prindiville of the NCI's Center for Cancer Research and Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics.
Why Is This Trial Important?
Breast cancer is the second
most common type of cancer among
women in the United States. Changes
in certain genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, and
others) increase the risk of breast cancer.
Imaging tests such as magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) or positron
emission tomography (PET)
scans may improve the ability to
detect breast cancer in women who
have a genetic risk for the disease.
This breast imaging study is exploring
whether MRI can detect cancer
better than standard mammography
in women who have a genetic
risk. PET scans are being used for
any study participant whose mammogram
or MRI findings require
additional evaluation. Breast Duct
Lavage, a noninvasive technique in
which breast cells are washed from
the lining of breast milk ducts, is also
being studied to determine if cellular
or molecular changes in duct lavage
fluid can be used to detect cancer
before it is clinically detectable.
"We hope that these new breast
imaging and nipple fluid sampling
techniques will enable us to find
breast cancer at an even earlier stage
in women who are at high risk of
this disease, particularly in younger
women for whom
mammography is less
effective in finding early
breast cancers," said Dr.
Prindiville.
Who Can Join This Trial?
Researchers seek to enroll
approximately 200
healthy women age 25
to 56 from the greater
metropolitan Washington
D.C. area who are
known to carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation, or who are at higher risk of
breast cancer because of their family
history. See the full list of eligibility
criteria for this trial at http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/NCI-01-C-0009.
Where Is This Trial Taking Place?
The breast imaging study is taking place at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center in Bethesda, Md.
Who to Contact
To speak with the recruitment nurse, Ms. Stephanie Steinbart, call 1-800-518-8474, or call the NCI's Clinical Studies Support Center (CSSC) at
1-888-NCI-1937 (1-888-624-1937). The CSSC provides information about cancer trials taking place on the NIH
campus in Bethesda, Md. The call is toll-free and completely confidential.
For more information, visit the study's
Web site at http://breastimaging.cancer.gov.
An archive of "Featured Clinical Trial" columns is available at http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/ft-all-featured-trials.
|
 |
 |
Developmental Projects in Complementary Approaches to Cancer Care
PA-04-053
Application Receipt Dates: June 1, 2004;
Oct. 1, 2004; Feb. 1, 2005; June 1, 2005; Oct. 1, 2005
Investigators are invited to submit research grant applications to conduct
innovative developmental pilot research investigating complementary
approaches in cancer. This PA uses the R21 Developmental/Exploratory Grants
award mechanism to encourage and support the development of basic and
clinical complementary cancer research and to provide the basis for more extended
research projects by establishing the methodological feasibility, strengthening
the scientific rationale for these projects, and collecting preliminary data.
For information see http://cri.nci.nih.gov.
Inquiries: Dr. Wendy B. Smith, smithwe@mail.nih.gov
Improving Care for Dying Children and Their Families
PA-04-057
Application Receipt Dates: June 1, 2004; Oct. 1, 2004;
Feb. 1, 2005; June 1, 2005; Oct. 1, 2005;
Feb. 1, 2006; June 1, 2006; Oct. 1, 2006
NCI seeks R01/R21 applications for research on improving the quality of
life for children who are approaching the end of life, the quality of the dying
process, and the process of bereavement following the death for the children's
families, friends, and other care providers. Research is needed to identify and
test approaches that health care providers can implement to improve the care
of dying children in all settings.
For information see http://cri.nci.nih.gov.
Inquiries: Dr. Ann O'Mara, omaraa@mail.nih.gov
Cancer Prevention, Control, and Behavioral and Population Sciences Career Development Award
PAR-04-055
Application Receipt Dates: June 1, 2004; Oct. 1, 2004;
Feb. 1, 2005; June 1, 2005; Oct. 1 2005
NCI seeks K07 applications from investigators
who have made a commitment
to focus their research endeavors in
cancer prevention, cancer control, and
behavioral and population sciences research.
Examples of relevant disciplines
include any aspect of human cancer
prevention; epidemiology; biostatistics;
human cancer genetics; clinical oncology;
human nutrition; behavioral and social
sciences; health promotion, health
services, and health policy research;
and medical decision analysis, survivorship,
and quality of life. This Program
Announcement replaces PAR-01-135.
For information see http://cri.nci.nih.gov.
Inquiries: Dr. Lester S. Gorelic, gorelicl@mail.nih.gov
Pharmacogenetics Research Network
and Knowledge Base
RFA-GM-04-002
Letter of Intent Receipt Date: July 19, 2004
Application Receipt Date: Aug. 19, 2004
Applications are invited for an open
recompetition of the Pharmacogenetics
Research Network and Knowledge Base.
This is a network of multidisciplinary,
collaborative groups of investigators
that contribute their data to the publicly
available knowledge base PharmGKB,
which is an open research tool accessible
to all scientists. NCI is interested
in projects that can potentially lead to
meaningful improvements in clinical
and survival end points and in studies of
genetic variability in human populations
that may influence risk of preneoplastic
conditions or primary and secondary
malignancies after exposure to medications,
including cancer therapies.
For information see http://cri.nci.nih.gov.
Inquiries: Dr. Ken Kobayashi, kobayashik@ctep.nci.nih.gov;
Dr. J. Fernando Arena, arenaj@mail.nih.gov
|
 |
 |

NCI Appoints New Deputy Director
Dr. Mark Clanton, former president-elect
of the American Cancer Society,
has been named deputy director for
Cancer Care and Delivery Systems
at NCI. Dr. Clanton received his
M.D. from Tulane University Medical
School and his M.P.H. in Health
Policy and Management from the
Harvard School of Public Health;
he also holds a certificate in finance
from the Cox School of Business at
Southern Methodist University and is
a graduate of Howard University. He
is a fellow of the American Academy
of Pediatrics. With 10 years of experience
with managed care and health
plan administration, he was the first
African American to be promoted to
the post of Chief Medical Officer of
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas.
At Blue Cross, he was the executive
responsible for new medical technology
assessment, medical policy development,
health services research, and
leading the pharmacy drug program
for more than 1 million members.
3,000 Patients Accrued to Cancer Trials Support Unit
Recently, NCI's Cancer Trials Support
Unit (CTSU) achieved a significant
milestone when it enrolled its 3,000th
patient on a clinical trial. CTSU was
created to make NCI-supported
Cooperative Group treatment trials
more accessible to qualified oncologists
and their patients. It also has
helped coordinate the multiple Cooperative
Group regulatory systems,
thereby helping to reduce the administrative
burden on physicians participating
in these large, multicenter
trials. Since opening in October 2000,
CTSU now offers a menu of 49 protocols
across a variety of common solid
tumors and hematologic cancers. Investigators
and their staffs can access
CTSU at www.ctsu.org, where protocol-specific and general educational
materials can be easily downloaded.
"CTSU has made it possible for investigators
to participate in trials that are
best for their patients, even if the trial
is not being led by their group. This is
helping to shorten the time needed to
complete some important protocols,
such as CALGB C40101, ECOG 3200
and NCIC-CTG MA.27. The original
vision of the CTSU is starting to be
realized," said Steve Riordan, CTSU
project director.
New Deputy Directors Announced at All-Hands Meeting
Speaking at his second "all-hands"
meeting since becoming NCI director,
Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach
announced the establishment of four
new deputy director positions that
"will be arrayed across the realm
of the discovery, development, and
delivery continuum," and "help to
organize and orchestrate the entire
NCI portfolio."
Dr. Anna Barker, currently deputy
director for Strategic Scientific
Initiatives, has been named deputy
director for Advanced Technologies
and Strategic Partnerships. Dr. Mark
Clanton will serve as deputy director
for Cancer Care and Delivery Systems.
Negotiations are ongoing with candidates
for the position of deputy director
for Integrative Biology and Molecular
Oncology as well as deputy director for
Translational and Clinical Sciences.
NCI at AAAS
Attendees at the 2004 annual meeting
of the American Association for
the Advancement of Science can
visit NCI in the meeting's exhibit hall
from Feb. 13 through 16. Attendees
will be able to learn about NCI, its
research resources, and opportunities
for training.
|
 |
 |
This is a list of selected scientific meetings sponsored by NCI and other organizations. For locations and times and a more complete list of scientific meetings, including NCI's weekly seminars and presentations open to the public, see the NCI Calendar of Scientific Meetings at http://calendar.cancer.gov.
| 2004 NCI Advisory Committee Upcoming Meetings February-March |
Date
Feb 18-19 |
Advisory Committee
National Cancer Advisory Board |
|
Mar 15-16 |
Clinical Sciences and Epidemiology - Subcommittee 1, Board of Scientific Counselors, NCI |
|
Mar 15-16 |
Basic Sciences - Subcommittee 2, Board of Scientific Counselors, NCI |
|
Mar 15-16 |
NCI Board of Scientific Advisors |
 |
| Selected Upcoming Meetings of Interest |
Date
Feb 11-13 |
Meeting
Scientific & Technological Advances in Cancer Research: Integrated Approaches to Effective Detection, Prognosis and Treatment of Cancer |
NCI Speakers
Dr. J. Carl Barrett, Director, Center for Cancer Research |
|
Feb 12-14 |
Tumor Prevention and Genetics 2004 |
Dr. Peter Greenwald, Director, Division of Cancer Prevention |
|
Feb 23-26 |
International Conference on Drug Development |
Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach, Director |
|
Feb 25-26 |
Central Florida Health Care Coalition's 11th Annual National Conference |
Dr. Ellen Feigal, Acting Director, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis |
|
Feb 26-28 |
The Last Miles of the Way Home: National Conference to Improve End-of-Life Care for African Americans |
Dr. Harold P. Freeman, Director, Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities |
 |
| NCI Exhibits |
Date:
Feb 12-16 |
Meeting
American Association for the Advancement of Science |
Location
Seattle, Washington |
NCI Exhibits
NCI Exhibits are presented at various professional and society meetings. Further information about the
NCI Exhibits program can be found at http://exhibits.cancer.gov.
|
 |
|
Table of Links
| 1 | http://cancer.gov/ncicancerbulletin/NCI_Cancer_Bulletin_021004/page2 |
| 2 | http://cancer.gov/ncicancerbulletin/NCI_Cancer_Bulletin_021004/page3 |
| 3 | http://cancer.gov/ncicancerbulletin/NCI_Cancer_Bulletin_021004/page6 |
|
 |