National Cancer Institute NCI Cancer Bulletin: A Trusted Source for Cancer Research News
October 20, 2009 • Volume 6 / Number 20

Page Options

  • Print This Page
  • Print This Document
  • View Entire Document
  • Email This Document

The information and links on this page are no longer being updated and are provided for reference purposes only.

FDA Update

FDA Approves Two HPV Vaccines: Cervarix for Girls, Gardasil for Boys

The FDA has approved a second vaccine to prevent cervical cancer and cervical precancers, the vaccine’s manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), announced last week. The approval is based on data from a large clinical trial showing that the vaccine, Cervarix, prevented precancerous lesions in 93 percent of those who received the full vaccine sequence of three injections over 6 months.

Cervarix is a bivalent vaccine, meaning it is specifically designed to protect against two human papillomavirus (HPV) types, HPV 16 and 18, which together are responsible for three-quarters of cervical cancers in North America. Clinical trial data also indicate that Cervarix offers more modest protection against precancerous lesions associated with HPV 31, GSK explained in a statement, as well as other tumor-causing (or oncogenic) HPV types. The company expects the vaccine to be available in the United States by the end of the year.

The FDA last week also approved the HPV vaccine Gardasil for the prevention of genital warts in boys. Gardasil is already approved and is being actively used in girls and young women for the prevention of cervical cancer. Gardasil is a quadrivalent vaccine that is designed to specifically protect against infections with four HPV types: 16, 18, 6, and 11. HPV types 6 and 11, which are not considered to be oncogenic, cause genital warts.

The agency’s approval of Gardasil for boys aged 9 to 26 is based on data from a randomized clinical trial of more than 4,000 males aged 16 to 26, which demonstrated 90 percent protection against HPV 6- and 11-related genital warts. In a press statement announcing the approval, the FDA explained that for boys aged 9 to 15, studies have been conducted to measure their immune response to the vaccine, and “the results showed that the immune response was as good as that found in the 16- to 26- year-old age group, indicating that the vaccine should have similar effectiveness.”

A number of studies have now linked infection with HPV 16 to certain types of head and neck cancers, in particular oropharyngeal cancer (the tonsils and base of the tongue), the rates of which have been increasing over the last decade. So there is a chance, some researchers believe, that widespread HPV vaccination of both males and females could have a broader cancer prevention effect.

“There is every reason to be optimistic that vaccination may help us to reduce the current trends of HPV-related tonsillar cancer,” said Dr. Maura Gillison, a researcher at Ohio State University who was among the first to identify the link between HPV and head and neck cancer. Dr. Gillison said she is hopeful that a clinical trial can be launched in the near future to assess whether vaccination can prevent oral HPV 16 infections.

The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which makes recommendations on the administration of FDA-approved vaccines to the medical community, will decide later this week whether to recommend that males be vaccinated against HPV to prevent genital warts.

FDA Approves New Targeted Therapy for Kidney Cancer

There are now six agents available for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer, with the FDA’s approval yesterday of pazopanib (Votrient). The approval is based on the results of an international phase III clinical trial that showed an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS)—survival in the absence of tumor growth—compared with patients who received a placebo. The trial found no improvement in overall survival with the drug.

Earlier this month, the agency’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 10-0 in favor of approving pazopanib. This came despite concerns raised by the agency’s own review staff about some of the side effects associated with pazopanib in the trial, including three deaths caused by severe liver injury. The side effects call into question “the benefit-to-risk ratio of pazopanib in the intended population of patients,” particularly considering the availability of other effective therapies, FDA reviewers wrote in a briefing document.

In the trial, the results of which were presented earlier this year at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, PFS more than doubled in patients given pazopanib compared with those who received placebo, 9.2 months versus 4.2 months. The PFS improvement was the strongest in patients who had not been previously treated, 11.1 months versus 2.8 months. The most common side effects associated with pazopanib in the trial were diarrhea and hypertension, as well as an elevation in the ALT liver enzyme, a common indicator of liver injury.

An industry-sponsored phase III trial comparing pazopanib against sunitinib (Sutent) is currently enrolling patients.

< Previous Section  |  Next Section >