|
|
Phase III Randomized Study of CDDP vs TAX vs CDDP/TAX in Patients with Suboptimal Stage III/IV Ovarian Epithelial Carcinoma
Basic Trial Information
Objectives I. Determine the relative efficacy of cisplatin (CDDP) vs. taxol (TAX) vs. CDDP/TAX in women with suboptimal Stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer following appropriate surgery. II. Determine the most favorable regimen in terms of progression-free and overall survival. III. Compare the incidence of ototoxicity and other toxicities arising from any of these three regimens. Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics: Histologically confirmed, primary, Stage III/IV ovarian epithelial cancer of one of the following histologies: Serous adenocarcinoma Undifferentiated carcinoma Mucinous adenocarcinoma Mixed epithelial carcinoma Clear cell adenocarcinoma Malignant Brenner's tumor Endometrioid adenocarcinoma Transitional cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma - NOS Disease must be suboptimal (greater than 1 cm in diameter) following appropriate surgery (at a minimum, exploratory laparotomy) Protocol entry within 6 weeks of surgery required Measurable disease preferred but not required Cytologic confirmation required if malignant pleural effusion is the sole disease manifestation No borderline carcinoma No unclassified ovarian cancer (i.e., patient not explored or verification of ovarian stromal origin not possible) Prior/Concurrent Therapy: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for cancer Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No prior radiotherapy Surgery: Exploratory laparotomy and appropriate surgical debulking required within 6 weeks of entry Patient Characteristics:
Age:
Any age
Performance status:
GOG 0-2
Hematopoietic:
WBC at least 3,000
AGC at least 1,500
Platelets at least 100,000
Hepatic:
Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 x normal
SGOT no greater than 3 x normal
No acute hepatitis
Renal:
Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dl
Cardiovascular:
No history of CHF
No unstable angina
No MI within the past 6 months
No history of arrhythmia or requirement for antiarrhythmic
agents
Other:
No septicemia or severe infection
No severe GI bleeding
No prior or concomitant second malignancy except
nonmelanomatous skin cancer
Expected Enrollment 600 patients will be accrued over an estimated 30 months. After 50 failures are reported on Arm I, progression-free survival will be assessed; if at least 1 of the single-agent arms is clearly inferior to the combination arm, accrual to the least effective arm will cease. Outline Randomized study. Arm I: Single-agent Chemotherapy. Cisplatin, CDDP, NSC-119875. Arm II: Single-agent Chemotherapy. Taxol, TAX, NSC-125973. Arm III: 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. CDDP; TAX.Published Results Muggia FM, Braly PS, Brady MF, et al.: Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 18 (1): 106-15, 2000.[PUBMED Abstract] Muggia FM, Braly PS, Brady MF, et al.: Phase III of cisplatin (P) or paclitaxel (T), versus their combination in suboptimal stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study #132. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 16: A-1257, 352a, 1997. Related PublicationsColombo N, Parma G, Bocciolone L, et al.: Medical therapy of advanced malignant epithelial tumours of the ovary. Forum (Genova) 10 (4): 323-32, 2000 Oct-Dec.[PUBMED Abstract] Secord AA, Lee PS, Darcy KM, et al.: Maspin expression in epithelial ovarian cancer and associations with poor prognosis: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 101 (3): 390-7, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract] Havrilesky L, Fleming ND, Miner Z, et al.: Correlations between cell cycle regulatory genes and relationship to ovarian cancer prognosis: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2007 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 3-7, 2007, San Diego, CA. A-299, 2007. Havrilesky LJ, Alvarez AA, Whitaker R, et al.: Loss of expression of the P16 tumor suppressor gene is more frequent in advanced ovarian cancers lacking P53 mutations. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists 2004 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, 7-11 February 2004, San Diego, California. A-814, 2004. Jewell EL, Darcy KM, Hutson A, et al.: Association between the N-terminally truncated (DeltaN) p63alpha (DeltaNp63alpha) isoform and debulking status, VEGF expression and progression-free survival in previously untreated, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol : , 2009.[PUBMED Abstract] Moss C, Kaye SB: Ovarian cancer: progress and continuing controversies in management. Eur J Cancer 38 (13): 1701-7, 2002.[PUBMED Abstract] Muggia FM: Sequential single agents as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: a strategy derived from the results of GOG-132. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13 (Suppl 2): 156-62, 2003 Nov-Dec.[PUBMED Abstract] Sandercock J, Parmar MK, Torri V: First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence. Br J Cancer 78 (11): 1471-8, 1998.[PUBMED Abstract] Secord AA, Darcy K, Hutson A, et al.: The role of methylation in the regulation of angiogenic inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2006 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 22-26, 2006, Palm Springs, CA. A-192, 2006. Secord AA, Darcy KM, Hutson A, et al.: Co-expression of angiogenic markers and associations with prognosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 106 (1): 221-32, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al.: Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 25 (24): 3621-7, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al.: Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 26 (1): 83-9, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract] Trial Lead Organizations Gynecologic Oncology Group
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NCI Home |
Text-Only Version |
Contact Us |
Policies |
Accessibility |
RSS |
Viewing Files |
FOIA |
Site Help |
Site Map
|
A Service of the National Cancer Institute |