Alternate Title
Basic Trial Information
Objectives
Entry Criteria
Expected Enrollment
Outline
Published Results
Related Publications
Trial Contact Information
Registry Information
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Bone Marrow Transplantation in Treating Children With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Sponsor | Protocol IDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase III | Treatment | Completed | Under 22 | NCI | COG-2961 CCG-2961, NCT00002798 |
Objectives
- Increase the remission induction rate to greater than 85% in children with untreated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) by replacing daunorubicin (DNR) with idarubicin (IDA) in intensively timed DCTER chemotherapy (dexamethasone, cytarabine (ARA-C), thioguanine, etoposide, and daunorubicin) in the first 4 days of each course.
- Increase the remission rate further by comparing the efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy with intensively timed IDA DCTER/DCTER vs fludarabine (FAMP), ARA-C, and IDA in maintaining remission and in achieving remission in patients with M2 disease (5%-29% blasts in marrow) at the end of induction chemotherapy.
- Compare overall survival, event-free survival, and disease-free survival in patients who receive consolidation with IDA DCTER/DCTER vs FAMP, ARA-C, and IDA.
- Compare overall survival, event-free survival, and disease-free survival in patients receiving intensification with the Capizzi II regimen (high-dose ARA-C and asparaginase) vs those receiving a matched-related allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
- Compare overall survival, event-free survival, and disease-free survival in patients treated with interleukin-2 (IL-2) vs standard follow up care after Capizzi II intensification.
- Determine whether multichannel flow cytometry detection of residual AML on a companion biologic study protocol CCG-B942 predicts outcome, and determine whether any of these treatment regimens eliminates minimal residual disease more effectively than another.
- Register all patients with MDS treated or followed at CCG institutions and capture their biologic, historical and outcome data.
- Determine, on a companion biologic study protocol CCG-B972, whether levels of IL-2 soluble receptor (sIL-2R) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) before, during, and after therapy correlates with outcome.
Entry Criteria
Disease Characteristics:
- Histologically confirmed previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia
(AML)
in patients 1 month to 21 years of age
- Infants under 1 month with progressive disease
eligible
- Supportive care may be given to confirm that the leukemia is not regressing prior to entry
- No acute promyelocytic leukemia (FAB M3)
- No acute undifferentiated leukemia (FAB M0)
- Infants under 1 month with progressive disease
eligible
- Histochemical verification of AML required by the following stains:
- Wright or Giemsa
- Peroxidase
- PAS
- Chloroacetate esterase
- Sudan black
- Nonspecific esterase (NSE) with and without fluoride (NaF) inhibition
- Combined NSE/NaF and butyrate inhibition or diagnosis
of megakaryoblastic
leukemia (FAB M7) should be supported by one of the
following:
- CD41 reactivity
- Glycoprotein 1b reactivity
- Factor VIII-related antigen reactivity
- Platelet peroxidase on electron microscopy
- The following are also eligible:
- Myelodysplastic syndromes, including:
- Refractory anemia (RA) *
- RA with ringed sideroblasts (RARS) *
- RA with excess blasts (RAEB)
- RAEB in transformation (RAEBt)
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)
- AML with monosomy 7
- Granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma) with or without marrow involvement
- Mixed lineage leukemia with 2 morphologically defined populations provided the predominant population is myeloid
- Myelodysplastic syndromes, including:
- No Downs syndrome
- No juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia
- No Fanconi's anemia
- No secondary AML
[Note: * RA and RARS may be registered and observed until treatment deemed necessary]
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- No prior anticancer chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy:
- Prior topical or inhaled steroids for nonmalignant conditions allowed
Radiotherapy :
- No prior anticancer radiotherapy
Surgery:
- Not specified
Other:
- No prior antileukemic therapy
Patient Characteristics:
Age:
- Under 22
Performance status:
- Not specified
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoeitic:
- Not specified
Hepatic:
- Not specified
Renal:
- Not specified
Expected Enrollment
880Approximately 880 patients with de novo acute myelogenous leukemia will be accrued for this study within 4 years. It is expected that 178 patients per year will be randomly assigned for consolidation, that 39 patients per year will undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplantation while 120 patients per year will receive chemotherapy as intensification, and that 102 patients per year will be randomly assigned for polychemotherapy immunomodulation. An additional 80 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes will be accrued for this study.
Outline
This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center, diagnosis (acute myelogenous leukemia vs other), and response to induction (partial vs complete remission). After induction, patients with M1/M2 marrow are randomized to arm I or II. Patients in complete remission after consolidation who have an HLA-identical or 1-antigen mismatched sibling or parent donor are nonrandomly assigned to the allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (AlBMT) regimen; all others in complete remission are nonrandomly assigned to the Capizzi II regimen, then are randomly assigned to arms III or IV. Patients with refractory anemia (RA) or RA with ringed sideroblasts with indolent disease may be registered and followed. Other patients with myelodysplastic syndromes may receive 2961 chemotherapy or go directly to AlBMT. Patients with chloromas (granulocytic sarcomas) receive optional radiotherapy on arm V.
- Induction: Patients receive idarubicin IV over 30 minutes on days 0-3,
cytarabine and etoposide IV continuously on days 0-3, and oral thioguanine
twice a day and oral dexamethasone 3 times a day on days 0-3. Patients then
begin course 2, which consists of cytarabine, etoposide, thioguanine, and
dexamethasone on days 10-13, daunorubicin IV continuously on days 10-13, and
filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) beginning on day 16 and continuing
until blood counts recover. Patients also receive CNS prophylaxis/therapy
consisting of cytarabine intrathecally (IT) on days 0 and 14 (if no CNS
disease at entry) or on days 0, 5, and 7 (if CNS disease present at
entry).
Disease is reassessed on day 28-42. Patients with M1 or M2 marrow proceed to consolidation while those with M3 marrow or progressive disease go off study.
- Consolidation:
- Arm I: Patients receive treatment as in induction therapy, plus G-CSF SC beginning on day 16 and continuing until blood counts recover. If CSF is clear by day 10 of induction, patients receive cytarabine IT on days 0, 10, and 35. If CSF is not clear, patients receive triple intrathecal therapy (TIT; cytarabine, hydrocortisone, methotrexate) on days 0 and 10.
- Arm II: Patients receive fludarabine IV over 24 hours on days 0 and
1, cytarabine IV over 72 hours on days 2-4, and idarubicin IV over 15
minutes on days 0-2. G-CSF begins on day 6 and continues until blood counts
recover. Patients also receive TIT on days -1 and 7, if CSF is not clear on day
10 of induction.
Patients on both arms are reassessed on day 35. Those patients with M1 marrow proceed to intensification; all others are removed from the study.
- Intensification:
- Capizzi II regimen: Course 1: Patients receive cytarabine IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 0, 1, 7, and 8 and asparaginase IM on days 1 and 8. Course 2: Patients also receive cytarabine IT or TIT on days 0, 7, and 14.
- AlBMT regimen: Therapy begins within 2-8 weeks of hematologic
recovery. Patients may receive interim therapy consisting of oral thioguanine for
about 2 weeks. Patients then receive oral busulfan every 6 hours on days -9
to -6 and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -5 to -2. AlBMT is infused
over 4 hours beginning 36-48 hours after the last dose of
cyclophosphamide.
Patients in complete remission after completing the Capizzi II regimen proceed to maintenance therapy on arm III.
- Arm III: Patients receive interleukin-2 IV continuously on days 1-4 and 9-18.
- Arm IV: No further treatment.
- Arm V: Patients undergo radiotherapy to the chloroma 5 days a week for 2 weeks. Patients are followed monthly for 18 months, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months until 5 years from diagnosis.
Lange BJ, Yang RK, Gan J, et al.: Soluble interleukin-2 receptor α activation in a Children's Oncology Group randomized trial of interleukin-2 therapy for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 57 (3): 398-405, 2011.[PUBMED Abstract]
Lange BJ, Smith FO, Feusner J, et al.: Outcomes in CCG-2961, a children's oncology group phase 3 trial for untreated pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the children's oncology group. Blood 111 (3): 1044-53, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract]
Lange BJ, Gerbing RB, Feusner J, et al.: Mortality in overweight and underweight children with acute myeloid leukemia. JAMA 293 (2): 203-11, 2005.[PUBMED Abstract]
Lange BJ, Smith FO, Dinndorf PA, et al.: Outcomes in CCG-2961, a Children’s Cancer Group Phase III trial for untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). [Abstract] Blood 106 (11): A-169, 2005.
Related PublicationsJohnston DL, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: Superior outcome of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patients with orbital and CNS myeloid sarcoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 58 (4): 519-24, 2012.[PUBMED Abstract]
Ho PA, Kuhn J, Gerbing RB, et al.: WT1 synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism rs16754 correlates with higher mRNA expression and predicts significantly improved outcome in favorable-risk pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol 29 (6): 704-11, 2011.[PUBMED Abstract]
Ho PA, Zeng R, Alonzo TA, et al.: Prevalence and prognostic implications of WT1 mutations in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood 116 (5): 702-10, 2010.[PUBMED Abstract]
Johnston DL, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: The presence of central nervous system disease at diagnosis in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia does not affect survival: a Children's Oncology Group study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55 (3): 414-20, 2010.[PUBMED Abstract]
Phillips CL, Gerbing R, Alonzo T, et al.: MDM2 polymorphism increases susceptibility to childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55 (2): 248-53, 2010.[PUBMED Abstract]
Pollard JA, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: Prevalence and prognostic significance of KIT mutations in pediatric patients with core binding factor AML enrolled on serial pediatric cooperative trials for de novo AML. Blood 115 (12): 2372-9, 2010.[PUBMED Abstract]
Berman JN, Gerbing RB, Sung L, et al.: Prevalence and clinical implications of N-RAS mutations in childhood AML – A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. [Abstract] Blood 114 (22): A-3115, 2009.
Bhatla D, Gerbing RB, Alonzo TA, et al.: Cytidine deaminase genotype and toxicity of cytosine arabinoside therapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia. Br J Haematol 144 (3): 388-94, 2009.[PUBMED Abstract]
Ho PA, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: Prevalence and prognostic implications of CEBPA mutations in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood 113 (26): 6558-66, 2009.[PUBMED Abstract]
Kunty MA, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: RUNX1 mutations in pediatric AML: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. [Abstract] Blood 114 (22): A-2614, 2009.
Bhatla D, Gerbing RB, Alonzo TA, et al.: DNA repair polymorphisms and outcome of chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Leukemia 22 (2): 265-72, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract]
Horan JT, Alonzo TA, Lyman GH, et al.: Impact of disease risk on efficacy of matched related bone marrow transplantation for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 26 (35): 5797-801, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract]
Mehta PA, Gerbing RB, Alonzo TA, et al.: FAS promoter polymorphism: outcome of childhood acute myeloid leukemia. A children's oncology group report. Clin Cancer Res 14 (23): 7896-9, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract]
Meshinchi S, Stirewalt DL, Alonzo TA, et al.: Structural and numerical variation of FLT3/ITD in pediatric AML. Blood 111 (10): 4930-3, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract]
Sung L, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: Respiratory syncytial virus infections in children with acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51 (6): 784-6, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract]
Barbaric D, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: Minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (FAB AML-M0) is associated with an adverse outcome in children: a report from the Children's Oncology Group, studies CCG-2891 and CCG-2961. Blood 109 (6): 2314-21, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract]
Pollard J, Alonzo T, Gerbing R, et al.: Prevalence and prognostic significance of c-KIT mutations in pediatric CBF AML patients enrolled on serial CCG/COG protocols. [Abstract] Blood 110 (11): A-1442, 2007.
Brown P, McIntyre E, Rau R, et al.: Incidence and clinical significance of nucleophosmin mutations in childhood AML: a Childrens Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Blood 108 (11): A-221, 2006.
Aplenc R, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, et al.: Ethnicity and survival in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood 108 (1): 74-80, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract]
Loh ML, Reynolds MG, Vattikuti S, et al.: PTPN11 mutations in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Children's Cancer Group. Leukemia 18 (11): 1831-4, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract]
Perentesis JP, Alonzo TA, Gerbing R, et al.: Polymorphism in folate metabolism and outcomes of therapy in children with AML with and without Down Syndrome. [Abstract] Blood 102 (11 Pt 1): A-479, 2003.
Sievers EL, Lange BJ, Alonzo TA, et al.: Immunophenotypic evidence of leukemia after induction therapy predicts relapse: results from a prospective Children's Cancer Group Study of 252 acute myeloid leukemia patients. [Abstract] 2003 Pediatric Academic Societies' Annual Meeting, May 3-6, Seattle, Washington. A-1528, 2003. Available online Last accessed August 30, 2005.
Sievers EL, Lange BJ, Alonzo TA, et al.: Immunophenotypic evidence of leukemia after induction therapy predicts relapse: results from a prospective Children's Cancer Group study of 252 patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 101 (9): 3398-406, 2003.[PUBMED Abstract]
Trial Lead Organizations
Children's Oncology Group
| Beverly Lange, MD, Protocol chair |
| |||
| Registry Information | ||
| Official Title | A PHASE III STUDY IN CHILDREN WITH UNTREATED ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA (AML) OR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME (MDS) | |
| Trial Start Date | 1996-08-30 | |
| Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT00002798 | |
| Date Submitted to PDQ | 1996-08-30 | |
| Information Last Verified | 2002-10-01 | |
| NCI Grant/Contract Number | CA13539 | |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol.
Back to Top
