Alternate Title
Basic Trial Information
Objectives
Entry Criteria
Expected Enrollment
Outline
Published Results
Related Publications
Trial Contact Information
Registry Information
Platinum-based Chemotherapy With or Without Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Sponsor | Protocol IDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase III | Treatment | Closed | Not specified | Other | MRC-ICON4 EU-96051, ISRCTN47434271, NCT00002894 |
Objectives
- Compare survival of patients with relapsed ovarian epithelial or peritoneal cancer treated with paclitaxel and either carboplatin or cisplatin vs conventional platinum-based chemotherapy.
- Compare the quality of life and health economics of these regimens in these patients.
Entry Criteria
Disease Characteristics:
- Ovarian epithelial cancer or serous peritoneal carcinoma that has
relapsed
after prior chemotherapy
- Progression-free interval (from end of last treatment) of at least 6 months
- Measurable disease not required
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- See Disease Characteristics
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- Not specified
Surgery
- Not specified
Patient Characteristics:
Age:
- Not specified
Performance status:
- Not specified
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- Not specified
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin less than 2 times normal
Renal:
- Not specified
Other:
- No sepsis
- No contraindication to chemotherapy
Expected Enrollment
800A maximum of 800 patients will be accrued for this study.
Outline
This is a randomized study. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive platinum-based chemotherapy (that is familiar to the oncologist and used routinely by the center) comprising either cisplatin or carboplatin alone or cisplatin in combination with other drugs.
- Arm II: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours followed by either carboplatin or cisplatin.
Treatment for both arms continues every 3 weeks for up to 6 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed.
Patients are followed at 6 months, every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
Published ResultsLedermann JA: Randomised trial of paclitaxel in combination with platinum chemotherapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (ICON4/OVAR2.2). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-1794, 446, 2003.
Parmar MK, Ledermann JA, Colombo N, et al.: Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet 361 (9375): 2099-106, 2003.[PUBMED Abstract]
Related PublicationsKushner DM, Connor JP, Sanchez F, et al.: Weekly docetaxel and carboplatin for recurrent ovarian and peritoneal cancer: a phase II trial. Gynecol Oncol 105 (2): 358-64, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract]
Pfisterer J, Ledermann JA: Management of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 33 (2 Suppl 6): S12-6, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract]
Trial Lead Organizations
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit
| Jonathan Ledermann, MD, Protocol chair |
| |||
| Registry Information | ||
| Official Title | A RANDOMISED TRIAL OF PACLITAXEL (TAXOL) IN COMBINATION WITH PLATINUM CHEMOTHERAPY VS. CONVENTIONAL PLATINUM-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF WOMEN WITH RELAPSED OVARIAN CANCER | |
| Trial Start Date | 1996-03-01 | |
| Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT00002894 | |
| Date Submitted to PDQ | 1996-03-01 | |
| Information Last Verified | 2001-02-16 | |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol.
Back to Top
