Alternate Title
Basic Trial Information
Objectives
Entry Criteria
Expected Enrollment
Outline
Published Results
Trial Contact Information
Registry Information
Conventional Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Treating Patients With Colorectal Cancer
| Phase | Type | Status | Age | Sponsor | Protocol IDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase III | Treatment | Closed | 18 and over | Other | MRC-CLASICC NYCTRU-CLASICC, EU-98014, ISRCTN74883561, NCT00003354 |
Objectives
- Determine whether longitudinal and circumferential resection margins and lymphatic clearances obtained during laparoscopic surgery are different from those obtained with conventional open surgery in patients with colorectal cancer.
- Compare the patterns of loco-regional or distant metastatic spread after these two surgical methods in these patients.
- Compare the morbidity and mortality rates in these patients after these two surgical methods, particularly in terms of the technical or thromboembolic complications that may develop as a consequence of prolonged pneumoperitoneum.
- Compare the disease-free or overall survival of these patients after these two operative procedures.
- Determine, in those patients in whom laparoscopic surgery fails, which investigatory modalities are appropriate for providing pre-operative indications that a patient is an inappropriate candidate for laparoscopic dissection.
- Compare the differences in quality of life between the two operative procedures, particularly in patients with advanced disease.
Entry Criteria
Disease Characteristics:
- Histologically confirmed colorectal cancer
- Must be suitable for elective surgical resection by right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, anterior resection or abdomino-perineal resection
- No adenocarcinoma of the transverse colon
- No synchronous multiple adenocarcinomas
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- Not specified
- Adjuvant chemotherapy allowed
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- Preoperative radiotherapy must be administered before randomization into this trial
- Adjuvant radiotherapy allowed
Surgery:
- See Disease Characteristics
Patient Characteristics:
Age:
- 18 and over
Performance status:
- Not specified
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- Not specified
Hepatic:
- Not specified
Renal:
- Not specified
Pulmonary:
- No contraindication to pneumoperitoneum such as severe cardio-respiratory disease
Other:
- No acute intestinal obstruction
- No prior malignancy within the past 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or prostate cancer
- Not pregnant
- No gastrointestinal disease that requires surgical intervention, e.g., Crohn's disease, chronic ulcerative disease, familial polyposis
Expected Enrollment
1200Approximately 1,200 patients will be accrued for this study within 5 years.
Outline
This is a randomized, multicenter study.
Patients undergo laparoscopic surgery or conventional open surgery.
Patients are followed at 1 and 3 months following surgery, then every 3 months for the first year, every 4 months for the second year, and then every 6 months thereafter.
Published ResultsGuillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al.: Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365 (9472): 1718-26, 2005 May 14-20.[PUBMED Abstract]
Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al.: Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92 (9): 1124-32, 2005.[PUBMED Abstract]
Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al.: Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25 (21): 3061-8, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract]
Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al.: Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97 (11): 1638-45, 2010.[PUBMED Abstract]
Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR, et al.: Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg 97 (1): 70-8, 2010.[PUBMED Abstract]
Trial Lead Organizations
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit
| P.J. Guillou, MD, Protocol chair |
| ||
| Registry Information | ||
| Official Title | Conventional Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer | |
| Trial Start Date | 1996-07-01 | |
| Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT00003354 | |
| Date Submitted to PDQ | 1998-05-29 | |
| Information Last Verified | 2001-01-08 | |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol.
Back to Top

