|
|
NCI HIGH PRIORITY CLINICAL TRIAL --- Phase III Randomized Comparison of Conventional CMF Maintenance vs High-Dose Combination Chemotherapy plus Autologous Bone Marrow and Peripheral Stem Cell Rescue in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Responding to Conventional Induction Chemotherapy
Alternate Title Combination Chemotherapy With or Without a Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
Objectives I. Compare time to failure and overall survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer responding after 4-6 courses of conventional induction chemotherapy who are randomly assigned to 24 months of conventional maintenance chemotherapy with CMF (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil) vs. high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide/thiotepa/carboplatin followed by autologous bone marrow and peripheral stem cell rescue. II. Compare the toxicity of these 2 regimens. III. Compare the financial costs of these 2 regimens. IV. Evaluate the quality of life associated with these 2 treatments. Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
Histologically documented adenocarcinoma of the breast
Metastatic or recurrent disease
No leptomeningeal or brain metastases
Inflammatory breast cancer requires distant metastases
Adequate hepatic function (see below) required with liver metastases
Metastases to ipsilateral regional lymph nodes
(supraclavicular or cervical) only may be treated by mastectomy or
locoregional radiotherapy
Hormonal receptor status:
Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or unknown
ER-positive (at least 10 fmol/mg cytosol protein) bone/soft tissue disease
eligible only if progressed on at least 1 hormone manipulation in the
adjuvant or metastatic setting
ER-positive, visceral disease eligible without prior hormone therapy
Bidimensionally measurable or evaluable disease, as follows:
Not irradiated or progressed since radiotherapy
Evaluable disease defined as:
Blastic and mixed blastic/lytic lesions with no anticipated need for
palliative radiotherapy during first 3 courses
Pure osteolytic lesions
Positive bone scan as only evidence of metastasis permitted provided
patient has analgesic requirement or decreased performance status
Evidence must be unequivocal if bone x-ray is negative
Hepatic metastases greater than 2 cm on CT or MRI or of any size if
biopsy-proven
Abdominal or pelvic mass on CT or MRI
Multinodular or confluent lung or skin metastases
Cytologically positive pleural effusion
No large third-space fluid accumulation that cannot be drained
No large pericardial effusion
Prior/Concurrent Therapy: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: One course of induction therapy as specified in the protocol allowed prior to entry No other chemotherapy for metastatic disease, except patient may have relapsed after primary treatment for stage IV disease by virtue of metastasis only to ipsilateral supraclavicular nodes At least 6 months between adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence Endocrine therapy: Prior hormone manipulation required for bone or visceral metastasis unless rapidly progressing At least 4 weeks since or no benefit from oophorectomy for metastatic or recurrent disease Radiotherapy: None to pelvic bones or lower spine No anticipated requirement for palliation during first 3 courses Surgery: At least 2 weeks since major surgery Patient Characteristics:
Age:
18 to 60
Sex:
Women only
Menopausal status:
Premenopausal or postmenopausal
Performance status:
ECOG 0 or 1
Hematopoietic:
ANC at least 1,500
Platelets at least 100,000
Hepatic:
Bilirubin not greater than 2.0 mg/dL
AST/alkaline phosphatase not greater than 2 times normal
If liver function compromised by metastatic disease:
Bilirubin not greater than 5.0 mg/dL
AST not greater than 600 U/mL
Renal:
After hydration:
Creatinine not greater than 1.5 mg/dL and/or
Creatinine clearance at least 60 mL/min
Cardiovascular:
No significant cardiovascular disease, i.e.:
No congestive heart failure
No myocardial infarction within 3 months
No arrhythmia requiring medication
No poorly controlled hypertension (diastolic over 100 mm Hg)
Pulmonary:
No significant non-neoplastic pulmonary disease
Other:
No active infection
No active peptic ulcer disease
No brittle insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
No hospitalization for psychiatric illness, including severe depression or
psychosis
No current alcohol or drug abuse
No pregnant or nursing women
Not HIV seropositive and no clinical evidence of AIDS
No active second malignancy within 10 years except:
Curatively treated nonmelanomatous skin cancer
In situ cervical carcinoma
Expected Enrollment 549 patients will be accrued. At least 99 patients with CR after Induction and 247 with PR will be required; accrual is expected to take 3 years for both groups. Outline This study is randomized for post-induction therapy. Patients are stratified by participating institution, prior doxorubicin therapy, estrogen receptor status, menopausal status, dominant metastatic site, and response to induction therapy. All patients receive induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil every 28 days for a total of 4-6 cycles. Patients who have received a lifetime cumulative doxorubicin dose of 400 mg per square meter or more or who achieve a lifetime dose of 500 mg per square meter during therapy are treated with methotrexate with or without prednisone in lieu of doxorubicin. All patients then undergo bone marrow and/or peripheral stem cell collection using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Patients who achieved a partial or complete response following induction are randomized for post-induction therapy. The first group receives high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin followed by rescue with autologous bone marrow and/or peripheral stem cells and GM-CSF support. The second receives standard-dose cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil.Published Results Daly MB, Goldstein LJ, Topolsky D, et al.: Quality of life experience in women randomized to high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell support (SCT) or standard dose chemotherapy for responding metastatic breast cancer in Philadelphia Intergroup Study (PBT-1). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 19: A327, 2000. Schulman KA, Glick HA, Goldstein LJ, et al.: Economic analysis of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell support (SCT) vs standard dose chemotherapy for women with responding metastatic breast cancer in the Philadelphia Intergroup Study (PBT-1). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 19: A325, 2000. Stadtmauer EA, O'Neill A, Goldstein LJ, et al.: Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. Philadelphia Bone Marrow Transplant Group. N Engl J Med 342 (15): 1069-76, 2000.[PUBMED Abstract] Stadtmauer EA, O'Neill A, Goldstein LJ, et al.: Phase III randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell support (SCT) shows no difference in overall survival or severe toxicity compared to maintenance chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorourcil (CMF) for women with metastatic breast cancer who are responding to conventional induction chemotherapy: the 'Philadelphia' Intergroup study (PBT-1). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A1, 1a, 1999. Trial Lead Organizations Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Philadelphia Bone Marrow Transplant Group
Southwest Oncology Group
North Central Cancer Treatment Group
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NCI Home |
Text-Only Version |
Contact Us |
Policies |
Accessibility |
RSS |
Viewing Files |
FOIA |
Site Help |
Site Map
|
A Service of the National Cancer Institute |