National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute
U.S. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute
NCI Home Cancer Topics Clinical Trials Cancer Statistics Research & Funding News About NCI
Prostate Cancer Screening (PDQ®)
Patient VersionHealth Professional VersionLast Modified: 07/27/2009



Purpose of This PDQ Summary






Summary of Evidence






Significance






Evidence of Benefit






Evidence of Harms






Get More Information From NCI







Changes to This Summary (07/27/2009)






Questions or Comments About This Summary






More Information



Page Options
Print This Page  Print This Page
Print This Document  Print Entire Document
View Entire Document  View Entire Document
E-Mail This Document  E-Mail This Document
Quick Links
Director's Corner

Dictionary of Cancer Terms

NCI Drug Dictionary

Funding Opportunities

NCI Publications

Advisory Boards and Groups

Science Serving People

Español
Quit Smoking Today
NCI Highlights
Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research

The Nation's Investment in Cancer Research FY 2010

Report to Nation Finds Declines in Cancer Incidence, Death Rates
Changes to This Summary (07/27/2009)

The PDQ cancer information summaries are reviewed regularly and updated as new information becomes available. This section describes the latest changes made to this summary as of the date above.

Evidence of Harms

Added text to state that screening has increased the incidence of prostate cancer, and there is evidence that not all patients diagnosed with prostate cancer as a consequence of screening are in immediate need of curative treatment, and death from other causes often occurs before screen detected, localized, and well-differentiated malignancies affect the survival of these patients.

Added text to state that the effectiveness of active surveillance was retrospectively investigated in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer trial.

Added text to state that men with positive lymph nodes or distant metastases at the time of diagnosis were excluded from the analysis.

Added text to state that the mean follow-up time for the 577 men in the retrospective assessment was 4.35 years.

Added text to state that after 7.75 years, 50% of men had received treatment, and the median treatment-free survival was 2.5 years.

Added text to state that the authors conclude that their data confirm prior studies' findings, that the favorable prognosis of many screen-detected prostate cancers may be actively followed, and curative treatment delayed, thereby delaying or avoiding the morbid consequences of radical therapy without diminishing survival.

Back to TopBack to Top

< Previous Section  |  Next Section >


A Service of the National Cancer Institute
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health USA.gov