National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute
U.S. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute
Send to Printer
Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)     
Last Modified: 03/26/2008
Health Professional Version
Stage Information

Current Clinical Trials

Terms used in this summary section are defined below in Table 1.:

Table 1: Definition of Terms
Term  Definition 
Favorable site Orbit; non-parameningeal head and neck; genitourinary excluding kidney, bladder, and prostate; biliary tract.
Unfavorable site Any site not considered favorable.
T1 Confined to anatomic site of origin.
T2 Extension and/or fixative to surrounding tissue.
a Tumor ≤5 cm in maximum diameter.
b Tumor >5 cm in maximum diameter.
N0 No clinical regional lymph node involvement.
N1 Clinical regional lymph node involvement.
NX Regional lymph nodes not examined; no information.
M0 No metastatic disease.
M1 Metastatic disease.

Staging of rhabdomyosarcoma is relatively complex. The process includes:

  1. Assigning a local tumor Group (status postsurgical resection/biopsy).


  2. Assigning stage (consider site, size, Group, presence/absence of metastases).


  3. Assigning a risk group (consider stage, Group, and histology).


As noted previously, prognosis for children with rhabdomyosarcoma is dependent on the primary site, size, Group, and histologic subtype. Favorable prognostic Groups have been identified by previous Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS), and treatment plans have been designed based on assignment of patients to different Groups based on prognosis. The IRS-I, IRS-II, and IRS-III studies prescribed treatment plans based on a surgicopathologic grouping system. In this system, Groups are defined by the extent of disease and by the extent of initial surgical resection after pathologic review of the tumor specimen(s). The definitions of these Groups in the IRS-I, IRS-II, and IRS-III studies are given in Table 2 below.[1,2]

Table 2: IRS Group Surgicopathologic Grouping System
Group  Definition 
I  [Note: Approximately 13% of all patients are in this Group.] A localized tumor that is completely removed with pathologically clear margins and no regional lymph node involvement.
II  [Note: Approximately 20% of all patients are in this Group.] A localized tumor that is grossly removed with: (A) microscopic disease at the margin, (B) involved, grossly removed regional lymph nodes, or (C) both A and B.
III  [Note: Approximately 48% of all patients are in this Group.] A localized tumor with gross residual disease after incomplete removal or biopsy only.
IV  [Note: Approximately 18% of all patients are in this Group.] Distant metastases are present at diagnosis.

The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) has merged with the National Wilm Tumor Study Group and with the two large cooperative pediatric cancer treatment groups to form the Children’s Oncology Group (COG). New protocols for children with soft tissue sarcoma are developed by the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the COG (STS-COG).

Current STS-COG protocols for rhabdomyosarcoma utilize a TNM-based pretreatment staging system which incorporates the surgicopathologic Group, primary tumor site, regional lymph node status, and the presence or absence of metastases. This staging system is described in Table 3 below.[3,4]

Table 3: STS-COG Pretreatment Staging System
Stage  Sites of Primary Tumor  Tumor Size  Regional Lymph Nodes  Distant Metastases 
1 Favorable sites Any size N0 , or N1, or NX M0
2 Unfavorable sites T1a or T2a N0 or NX M0
3 Unfavorable sites T1a, T2a, or N1 M0
T1b, T2b N0 or N1 or NX
4 Any site Any size N0 or N1 M1

Following stage assignment, a risk group is assigned. This takes into account stage, Group, and histology. Patients are classified for protocol purposes as low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk.[5,6] Treatment assignment is based on risk group. Table 4 shows the current risk group classification.

Table 4: IRSG Rhabdomyosarcoma Risk Group Classification
Risk Group  Histology  Stage  Group 
Low Risk Embryonal 1 I, II, III
Embryonal 2, 3 I, II
Intermediate Risk Embryonal 2, 3 III
Alveolar 1, 2, 3 I, II, III
High Risk Embryonal or Alveolar 4 IV

 [Note: Since 2006, patients with undifferentiated sarcoma are treated on the COG-STS protocol for non-rhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcoma.]

Current Clinical Trials

Check for U.S. clinical trials from NCI's PDQ Cancer Clinical Trials Registry that are now accepting patients with childhood rhabdomyosarcoma 5. The list of clinical trials can be further narrowed by location, drug, intervention, and other criteria.

General information about clinical trials is also available from the NCI Web site 6.

References

  1. Crist WM, Garnsey L, Beltangady MS, et al.: Prognosis in children with rhabdomyosarcoma: a report of the intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma studies I and II. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Committee. J Clin Oncol 8 (3): 443-52, 1990.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  2. Crist W, Gehan EA, Ragab AH, et al.: The Third Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. J Clin Oncol 13 (3): 610-30, 1995.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  3. Lawrence W Jr, Gehan EA, Hays DM, et al.: Prognostic significance of staging factors of the UICC staging system in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS-II). J Clin Oncol 5 (1): 46-54, 1987.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  4. Lawrence W Jr, Anderson JR, Gehan EA, et al.: Pretreatment TNM staging of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: a report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group. Children's Cancer Study Group. Pediatric Oncology Group. Cancer 80 (6): 1165-70, 1997.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  5. Raney RB, Anderson JR, Barr FG, et al.: Rhabdomyosarcoma and undifferentiated sarcoma in the first two decades of life: a selective review of intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study group experience and rationale for Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study V. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 23 (4): 215-20, 2001.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  6. Breneman JC, Lyden E, Pappo AS, et al.: Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma--a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV. J Clin Oncol 21 (1): 78-84, 2003.  [PUBMED Abstract]



Table of Links

1http://cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/childrhabdomyosarcoma/HealthProfes
sional/Table1
2http://cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/childrhabdomyosarcoma/HealthProfes
sional/Table2
3http://cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/childrhabdomyosarcoma/HealthProfes
sional/Table3
4http://cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/childrhabdomyosarcoma/HealthProfes
sional/Table4
5http://www.cancer.gov/Search/ClinicalTrialsLink.aspx?diagnosis=43149&tt=1&a
mp;format=2&cn=1
6http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials