Testing the Use of the Usual Chemotherapy before and after Surgery for Removable Pancreatic Cancer
Inclusion Criteria
- PRE-REGISTRATION (STEP 0)
- Histologic or cytologic proof of pancreatic adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma * TNM Stage: Tx-4, N0-1, M0 ** M0 disease does not include spread to distant lymph nodes and organs * Resectable Primary Tumor: Local radiographic reading must be consistent with resectable disease defined as the following on 1) arterial and venous phase contrast-enhanced abdominal/pelvic CT scan or abdominal/pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and 2) chest CT: ** No involvement or abutment of the celiac artery, common hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery, or replaced right hepatic artery (if applicable) ** Less than 180 degrees interface between tumor and vessel wall of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein, and patent portal vein/splenic vein confluence ** No evidence of metastatic disease
- Measurable disease or non-measurable disease * Non-measurable disease is defined as cytologic or histologic confirmation of adenocarcinoma of adenosquamous carcinoma by fine needle aspiration or core-biopsy of the pancreas without measurable disease by radiographic imaging
- REGISTRATION (STEP 1)
- Confirmation of resectable disease by real-time central imaging review by the Alliance Imaging Core Lab at Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Ohio
- Determined to be appropriate candidate for curative-intent pancreatectomy by surgeon intending to perform the resection
- No prior radiation therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, investigational therapy, or surgery for pancreatic cancer
- Not pregnant and not nursing, because this study involves an agent that has known genotoxic, mutagenic, and teratogenic effects * Therefore, for women of childbearing potential only, a negative pregnancy test done =< 14 days prior to registration is required
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1
- Total neuropathy score < 2
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >= 1,500/uL
- Platelet count >= 100,000/uL
- Total bilirubin =< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) * If obstructive jaundice is present, then biliary drainage must be initiated and total bilirubin =< 3.0
- Creatinine =< 1.5 x ULN OR calculated (Calc.) creatinine clearance >= 30 mL/min * Calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation
- No known Gilbert’s Syndrome or known homozygosity for UGAT1A1*28 polymorphism
- No comorbid conditions that would prohibit curative-intent pancreatectomy
- Chronic concomitant treatment with strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 is not allowed on this study. Patients on strong CYP3A4 inhibitors must discontinue the drug prior to registration
- Chronic concomitant treatment with strong inducers of CYP3A4 is not allowed on this study. Patients on strong CYP3A4 inducers must discontinue the drug prior to registration
Alabama
Mobile
Alaska
Anchorage
Arizona
Tucson
Arkansas
Ft. Smith
Jonesboro
California
Auburn
Berkeley
Burbank
Burlingame
Cameron Park
Modesto
Mountain View
Orange
Palo Alto
Roseville
Sacramento
San Francisco
San Mateo
Sunnyvale
Vacaville
Vallejo
Connecticut
Danbury
Norwalk
District of Columbia
Washington
Florida
Altamonte Springs
Aventura
Coral Gables
Deerfield Beach
Fort Myers
Lakeland
Miami
Miami Beach
Orlando
Plantation
Idaho
Boise
Caldwell
Coeur D'Alene
Fruitland
Meridian
Nampa
Post Falls
Twin Falls
Illinois
Aurora
Bloomington
Canton
Carbondale
Carterville
Carthage
Centralia
Chicago
Danville
DeKalb
Decatur
Effingham
Eureka
Galesburg
Geneva
Kewanee
Macomb
Mattoon
Mount Vernon
O'Fallon
Ottawa
Pekin
Peoria
Peru
Princeton
Springfield
Urbana
Warrenville
Indiana
South Bend
Iowa
Ames
Des Moines
West Des Moines
Kentucky
Lexington
Louisville
Madisonville
Louisiana
Baton Rouge
Massachusetts
Boston
Michigan
Adrian
Ann Arbor
Brighton
Canton
Chelsea
Detroit
Farmington Hills
Novi
Southfield
Mississippi
Grenada
New Albany
Oxford
Southhaven
Missouri
Ballwin
Cape Girardeau
Columbia
Jefferson City
Joplin
Rolla
Saint Joseph
Saint Louis
Sainte Genevieve
Springfield
Sullivan
Sunset Hills
Montana
Billings
Bozeman
Great Falls
Kalispell
Missoula
Nebraska
Omaha
Nevada
Reno
New Jersey
Basking Ridge
Middletown
Montvale
New York
Commack
East Syracuse
New York
Rochester
Stony Brook
Uniondale
West Harrison
North Carolina
Kinston
Winston-Salem
North Dakota
Fargo
Ohio
Akron
Chillicothe
Columbus
Dublin
Grove City
Mansfield
Marietta
Newark
Portsmouth
Toledo
Westerville
Zanesville
Oklahoma
Oklahoma City
Oregon
Bend
Clackamas
Coos Bay
Newberg
Portland
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh
South Carolina
Greenville
Greer
Seneca
South Dakota
Sioux Falls
Tennessee
Memphis
Texas
San Antonio
Washington
Aberdeen
Bellingham
Centralia
Edmonds
Everett
Issaquah
Lacey
Longview
Seattle
Sedro-Woolley
Vancouver
Walla Walla
Wisconsin
Antigo
Eau Claire
Marshfield
Medford
Minocqua
Rice Lake
Wausau
Wisconsin Rapids
Wyoming
Sheridan
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate and compare overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, leucovorin calcium and oxaliplatin (modified [m]FOLFIRINOX) and surgery versus up-front surgery followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate and compare disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative mFOLFIRINOX and surgery versus up-front surgery followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX.
II. To evaluate and compare time to locoregional recurrence (TLR) in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative mFOLFIRINOX and surgery versus up-front surgery followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX.
III. To evaluate and compare time to distant metastases (TDM) in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative mFOLFIRINOX and surgery versus up-front surgery followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX.
IV. To evaluate and compare the R0 resection rate in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative mFOLFIRINOX and surgery versus up-front surgery followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX.
V. To evaluate and compare rate of unresectability in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative mFOLFIRINOX and surgery versus up-front surgery followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX.
VI. To evaluate rate of pathologic complete response in patients randomized to the perioperative therapy arm.
VII. To evaluate and compare mFOLFIRINOX dose intensity delivered and number of cycles received in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative mFOLFIRINOX and surgery versus up-front surgery followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX.
VIII. To evaluate and compare adverse event profile in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative mFOLFIRINOX and surgery versus up-front surgery followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX.
IX. To compare physical functioning, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea, as measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) between patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative mFOLFIRINOX and surgery versus up-front surgery followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX.
X. To prospectively assess the influence of diet, body mass index, weight loss, physical activity, and other lifestyle habits on the disease-free survival and overall survival among patients with localized pancreatic cancers.
XI. To assess the influence of diet, obesity, physical activity, and other lifestyle habits on the risk of toxicity associated with chemotherapy.
XII. To evaluate the ability of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics in distinguishing post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) fibrosis from viable tumor in patients randomized to the perioperative therapy arm.
XIII. To determine whether CT-based radiomics retrieved from baseline examination may act as non-invasive predictors of survival outcome in patients randomized to the adjuvant therapy arm.
OTHER OBJECTIVE:
I. Results of the primary analysis will be examined for consistency, while taking into account the stratification factors and/or covariates of baseline quality of life (QOL) and fatigue.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. Exploratory analyses will investigate the interaction of diet and molecular markers within tumors on the prognosis of patients with localized pancreatic cancer.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive oxaliplatin intravenously (IV) over 2 hours, irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes, and leucovorin calcium over 2 hours on day 1, and fluorouracil IV over 46-48 hours on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 14 days for 8 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Within 2-8 weeks, patients undergo surgical resection. Patients then receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours, irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes, and leucovorin calcium over 2 hours on day 1, and fluorouracil IV over 46-48 hours on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 14 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients undergo surgical resection. Beginning 3-12 weeks after surgery, patients then receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours, irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes, and leucovorin calcium over 2 hours on day 1, and fluorouracil IV over 46-48 hours on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 14 days for 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 6 years.
Trial Phase Phase III
Trial Type Treatment
Lead Organization
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Principal Investigator
Cristina R. Ferrone
- Primary ID A021806
- Secondary IDs NCI-2020-01560
- Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04340141