This phase II trial studies the effect of ruxolitinib and enasidenib in treating patients with accelerated or blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasm or chronic-phase myelofibrosis with an IDH2 mutation. The majority of the patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm have overactive JAK signaling (with or without a JAK mutation). Many patients who have myeloproliferative diseases have an IDH2 mutation. The presence of IDH mutation is associated with worse survival in patients with myelofibrosis. Research indicates that myeloproliferative neoplasm patients with the IDH mutation have a higher risk of their myeloproliferative neoplasm transforming to acute leukemia. Moreover, IDH mutations are among the most frequently encountered events in MPNs that have progressed to acute myeloid leukemia. Ruxolitinib is a treatment that targets JAK signaling and works by reducing the overactive signaling of the JAK to keep the production of blood cells controlled. Enasidenib works by inhibiting the IDH2 mutant enzyme, and helping the bone marrow grow normal mature blood cells. Giving ruxolitinib and enasidenib may work better in treating patients with accelerated or blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasm or chronic-phase myelofibrosis.
Additional locations may be listed on ClinicalTrials.gov for NCT04281498.
See trial information on ClinicalTrials.gov for a list of participating sites.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To estimate the efficacy of ruxolitinib and enasidenib combination therapy in patients with accelerated-phase and blast-phase disease.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the efficacy of the combination of ruxolitinib with enasidenib in patients with accelerated-phase and blast-phase disease using complete blast response (CBR) and partial blast response (PBR).
II. To assess the efficacy (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], clinical improvement) of the combination of ruxolitinib with enasidenib in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera (PV) myelofibrosis (MF), or post-essential thrombocythemia (ET) MF in chronic phase and 4-9% blasts as assessed by the modified 2013 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria.
III. To determine the safety of the combination of ruxolitinib and enasidenib based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE).
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the impact of the combination of ruxolitinib with enasidenib in patients with PMF, post-PV MF, or post-ET MF, on patient quality of life as assessed by the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MF-SAF version [v]4.0).
II. To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of ruxolitinib and enasidenib when combined in this population.
III. To evaluate the effects of combined therapy on gene expression and global methylation status.
IV. To explore changes in mutant allele burden and clonal architecture of disease.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive ruxolitinib phosphate orally (PO) once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) and enasidenib PO QD on days 1-28. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity and based on platelet count for chronic phase patients.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days.
Lead OrganizationIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Principal InvestigatorMichal Bar-Natan