Given the impact of leukemia cytogenetics and functional status determined by geriatric assessment on outcomes, we aim to integrate the results of these assessments to select intensive vs. less intensive chemotherapy. While the cytogenetic risk category can provide a probability to achieve complete remission with intensive chemotherapy, the findings of geriatric assessment can predict anticipated toxicity risk. Thus, a combination of clinical parameters such as level of fitness of patients as measured by geriatric assessment, and cytogenetic features of leukemia can provide a strategy to individualize therapy selection. The aim of such individualized therapy is to use intensive chemotherapy in patients most likely to benefit from intensive chemotherapy while reducing the risk of serious toxicities because of intolerance to intensive chemotherapy.
Study sponsor and potential other locations can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov for NCT03226418.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the rate of complete remission and 90-day mortality in the entire cohort of older patients (≥ 60 years) with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), who receive clinicogenetic risk-stratified therapy allocation.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the rate of complete remission and 90-day mortality in subsets of older patients who receive intensive and low-intensity chemotherapy.
II. To assess the impact of baseline functional status (measured by geriatric assessment) on mortality in older patients, who receive clinicogenetic risk-stratified therapy allocation.
III. To determine the symptom burden/quality of life, and functional status at diagnosis and following initiation of chemotherapy.
IV. To determine proportion of patients with impairments detected by geriatric assessment.
V. To calculate the percentage of older patients who receive allogeneic stem cell transplant during the study period.
VI. To assess overall survival at 1-year for the entire cohort of older patients.
CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVE:
I. Determine whether expression levels of inflammatory cytokines are regulated by miRNAs in patients with AML.
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 or 2 groups based on cytogenetic and geriatric assessment-based risk stratification.
GROUP I:
INTENSIVE INDUCTION THERAPY: Patients receive cytarabine intravenously (IV) on days 1-7 and idarubicin over 10-15 minutes on days 1-3, or liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1, 3 and 5. Treatment continues for 1 cycle in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION THERAPY: Patients who go into remission, receive cytarabine IV over 1-3 hours twice daily (BID) on days 1, 3, and 5. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 2-4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients treated with liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3. Treatment repeats every 5-8 weeks for 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
GROUP II:
LOW-INTENSITY INDUCTION AND CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive azacitidine IV over 10-40 minutes on days 1-7 or decitabine IV over 1-3 hours daily for 5-10 days. Treatment repeats every 4-5 weeks for 3 cycles or more in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive venetoclax orally (PO) daily for 3 months or more in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 2 years.
Lead OrganizationUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center
Principal InvestigatorVijaya Raj Bhatt