Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
This clinical trial compares how well extended hypofractionated radiation therapy (EHRT) and accelerated hypofractionated radiation (AHRT) therapy works in treating patients with prostate cancer. Hypofractionated radiation therapy delivers higher doses of radiation therapy over a shorter period of time and may kill more tumor cells and have fewer side effects. Shortening the course of treatment may improve the convenience and decrease the burden of cancer treatment for patients and their families.
Inclusion Criteria
- Histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma * Gleason score 2-7 * Biopsy within one year of date of randomization
- Clinical stage =< T2 based on digital rectal exam (DRE) and/or =< T3a based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (if done); N0-Nx; M0-Mx (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] 7th edition) * T-stage and N-stage determined by physical exam and available imaging studies (computed tomography [CT], and/or MRI of the pelvis). For MRI, questionable extracapsular extension is permitted. To distinguish blood from tumor the ideal study would be to acquire T2, T1 non-contrast and T1 dynamic contrast enhanced sequence, although this is not required. A small amount of extracapsular extension is permitted as long as it can be included in the clinical target volume (CTV) and the constraints are met * M-stage determined by physical exam, CT or MRI. Bone scan not required unless clinical findings suggest possible osseous metastases
- Prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 20 ng/ml, obtained no greater than 3 months prior to randomization
- Patients belonging in one of the following risk groups: * Low: Clinical stage T1-T2; Gleason =< 6, PSA =< 10 and < 50% biopsy cores positive ** Clinical stage is based on digital rectal exam (DRE). Seminal vesicle invasion on MRI is not eligible. T1a should be permitted is subsequent peripheral zone biopsies show tumor * Clinical stage T2b-T2c; Gleason =< 6, PSA =< 10 and < 50% biopsy cores positive * Clinical stage T1-T2; Gleason =< 6, PSA =< 10 and >= 50% biopsy cores positive * Clinical stage T1-T2; Gleason = 7, PSA =< 10 and < 50% biopsy cores positive or T1-T2; Gleason =< 6 and PSA > 10 and < 20 and 50% biopsy cores positive * MRI stage T3a with evidence of extraprostatic extension is allowed
- Prostate volume: =< 80 cc * Measured from CT or MRI =< 90 days prior to randomization
- Zubrod performance status 0-1 or equivalent
- No prior total prostatectomy or cryotherapy of the prostate * Prior suprapubic prostatectomy, transurethral resection and laser ablation are permitted
- No prior radiotherapy to the prostate or lower pelvis
- No implanted hardware or other material that would prohibit appropriate treatment planning or treatment delivery, in the investigator's opinion
- No chemotherapy for a malignancy in the last 5 years
- No history of an invasive malignancy (other than this prostate cancer, or non-metastatic basal, squamous skin cancers, or non-metastatic curatively treated papillary thyroid carcinoma) in the last 3 years
- 4-6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are allowed for intermediate risk patients (pts). This must be declared prior randomization. This may not have been started more than 2 months prior to randomization
- Patient must be able to have gold fiducial markers placed in the prostate or, if patient already has fiducial markers placed, they must be in accordance with the protocol specification. Note: If a method of intrafraction prostate tracking is available which does not require fiducial markers, this will be adequate for this trial (i.e 4 dimensional [D] transperitoneal ultrasound, onboard MRI guidance [Viewray])
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
- Willingness to fill out quality of life/psychosocial forms
- Age ≥ 35 and ≤ 85 years
- International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) (American Urological Association [AUA]) score =< 12
Exclusion Criteria
- Does not have a diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma
- Patient has clinical T3a or any evidence of T3b disease
- Patient has stage N1 or M1 disease
- Patient has a PSA of >= 20 ng/ml obtained no greater than 3 months prior to randomization
- Patient does not meet any of the risk groups
- Prostate volume greater than 80 cc
- Zubrod performance status 2 or greater
- Prior total prostatectomy or cryotherapy of the prostate
- Prior radiation therapy to the prostate or lower pelvis
- Implanted hardware which limits treatment planning or delivery (determined by the investigator)
- Chemotherapy within the past 5 years
- Diagnosis of an invasive malignancy within 3 years (other than current prostate cancer or non-metastatic basal, squamous skin cancers, or non-metastatic curatively treated papillary thyroid carcinoma)
- The use of more than 2 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prior to randomization or plans for ADT to be continued for greater than 6 months
- Inability to have gold fiducial markers placed in the prostate, or fiducial markers already placed, that are not in accordance with protocol * Note: If a method of intrafraction prostate tracking is available which does not require fiducial markers, this will be adequate for this trial (i.e. 4D transperitoneal ultrasound, onboard MRI guidance [Viewray])
- Unwilling or inability to give informed consent
- IPSS score > 12
Study sponsor and potential other locations can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov for NCT01794403.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare the four-year biochemical failure rate (prostate specific antigen [PSA] failure) by Pheonix definition between the treatment arms (AHRT and EHRT) using a non-inferiority margin of 12%.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Compare AHRT and EHRT with respect to two-year failure rate (biochemical or clinical failure, or positive biopsy).
II. Compare acute toxicity rates of AHRT and EHRT.
III. Compare AHRT and EHRT with respect to prostate cancer mortality and overall survival.
IV. Compare AHRT and EHRT with respect to quality of life (QOL), including erectile dysfunction rates, in generic and organ-specific domains.
V. Rates of ASTRO-defined biochemical failure.
VI. Examine the relationship of biomarkers from pretreatment diagnostic tissue and blood to the efficacy endpoints, toxicity and QOL.
VII. To compare the rates of late-occurring grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal (G.I.) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity.
VIII. Evaluate the comparative effectiveness of each treatment regimen.
IX. Examine the cost utility of each treatment regimen.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I (EHRT): Patients undergo 25 fractions of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over 30-40 minutes each 5 days per week for 5-6 weeks. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and collection of blood samples on study and undergo biopsy during follow up. Patients may undergo collection of urine sample on study and bone scan as clinically indicated.
ARM II (AHRT): Patients undergo 5 fractions of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) over 30-40 minutes each within 2 weeks. Patients also undergo CT and/or MRI and collection of blood samples on study and undergo biopsy during follow up. Patients may undergo collection of urine sample on study and bone scan as clinically indicated.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at week 6, month 3, and then every 6 months thereafter for up to 5.25 years after radiation therapy.
Trial PhaseNo phase specified
Trial Typetreatment
Lead OrganizationUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Cancer Center
Principal InvestigatorMatthew Charles Abramowitz
- Primary ID20110491
- Secondary IDsNCI-2019-06935
- ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT01794403