This phase II randomized trial compares the effect of inhalational anesthesia (drawn in through the lungs) to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) (through a needle in a vein in the arm) in changing the body’s ability to recover from surgery and in affecting the immune system immediately after surgery in patients with colon cancer. A randomized clinical trial is a study in which the participants are divided by chance into separate groups that compare different interventions. Using chance to divide people into groups means that the groups will be similar and that the effects of the treatments they receive can be compared more fairly. Surgery and anesthesia can both cause stress to the body which can cause a temporarily lowered immune system. Anesthesiologists and surgeons disagree about whether these types of anesthesia change recovery from surgery or change the chance of cancer coming back following surgery. This study may help researchers learn how different types of general anesthesia impact the body’s recovery from surgery or cancer recurrence following surgery in colon cancer patients.
Additional locations may be listed on ClinicalTrials.gov for NCT06017141.
Locations matching your search criteria
United States
Kansas
Kansas City
University of Kansas Cancer CenterStatus: Active
Contact: Luke Vail Selby
Phone: 913-588-7750
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the differential impact of TIVA versus inhaled anesthesia on neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) inflammation and immunosuppression among patients undergoing cancer surgery.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the differential impact of TIVA versus inhaled total anesthesia choice on patient reported post-operative recovery:
Ia. Overall, and domain-specific post-operative recovery (as measured by the Quality of Recovery Score [QoR]-40) on the day of discharge and other post-operative timepoints;
Ib. Changes in overall and domain-specific post-operative recovery over time.
II. To evaluate the differential impact of TIVA versus inhaled total anesthesia choice on peri-operative clinical and anesthetic outcomes, as recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR), including:
IIa. Post-operative nausea and vomiting (from medical record);
IIb. Post-operative pain (measured on a 1-10 scale) (from medical record);
IIc. Return of gastrointestinal (GI) function (from medical record);
IId. Post-operative cognitive impairment (from medical record);
IIe. 30 and 90 days post-operative complications;
IIf. Disease-free survival (from medical record);
IIg. Overall survival (from medical record).
III. To evaluate the differential impact of TIVA versus inhaled total anesthesia choice on circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines, immune cell populations, global inflammatory markers.
IV. To evaluate the differential impact of TIVA versus inhaled total anesthesia choice on levels of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at multiple post-operative timepoints according to standard of care practices of the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) Division of Medical Oncology GI oncology practice.
V. Correlation of peri-operative clinical and anesthetic outcomes to neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) levels, measures of immune suppression, ctDNA.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the delivery of intraoperative anesthesia through direct observation, with data recorded using the TIVA QI Observation form.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive standard of care (SOC) sedation with sevoflurane via inhalation and fentanyl intravenously (IV) on study prior to SOC surgery. Some patients may also receive sedation with propofol IV prior to surgery. All patients also undergo blood sample collection throughout the study and collection of tissue sample during surgery.
ARM II: Patients receive SOC sedation with fentanyl IV and propofol IV on study prior to SOC surgery. Patients also undergo blood sample collection throughout the study and collection of tissue sample during surgery.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 and 3 days, 3 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and then yearly for 5 years from SOC surgery.
Lead OrganizationUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center
Principal InvestigatorLuke Vail Selby