This clinical trial compares the effect of single-port transvesical partial prostatectomy (PP) to high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of prostate cancer that is localized to the prostate gland. Researchers want to know whether surgical removal of part and not all of the prostate, via single port robotic transvesical PP, would be as effective as other standard forms of focal therapy including HIFU. Single-port transvesical PP is a minimally invasive procedure used to remove part of the prostate through the bladder in which the robotic surgical instruments are inserted, allowing direct access to the prostate. HIFU is another form of focal therapy which focuses numerous ultrasound beams onto a small targeted area that has been confirmed to have prostate cancer. By focusing ultrasound energy into a small area, the temperature in that small area rises significantly, and the tumor is destroyed. Undergoing HIFU and single-port transvesical PP may be safe, tolerable and/or effective options in treating patients with prostate cancer.
Study sponsor and potential other locations can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov for NCT05610852.
Locations matching your search criteria
United States
Ohio
Cleveland
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterStatus: Active
Contact: Jihad Kaouk
Phone: 216-444-2976
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate and compare the “in-field” treatment failure rates and failure free survival time between HIFU and partial prostatectomy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Perioperative parameters include operative time (defined as the time elapsed from skin incision to placement of the final skin suture for the PP approach, or from the insertion of the ultrasound probe to the rectum to time of removing it), console time for the PP approach and estimated blood loss.
II. Intraoperative complication comparison.
III. Pain and analgesic requirement of transvesical (TV) surgery compared to HIFU procedure.
IV. Pain intensity will be evaluated with a visual analog pain scale, a validated instrument.
V. Analgesic requirements will be obtained from medical charts and reported as units of oral morphine equivalent dose (mg).
VI. Hospital stay counted in hours from the time of the end of the procedure to discharge.
VII. Foley catheter duration counted in days, defined as the time from surgery to catheter removal.
VIII. Urinary continence, assessing the number of pads used daily.
IX. Erectile function assessed by the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF)-5 scale.
X. Biochemical recurrence defined as a rise in prostate specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer patients after treatment with focal therapy (PSA of NADIR+ 1.0ng/mL within the first 12 months or NADIR + 1.5 ng/ml rise from 12 to 36 months following PP or HIFU).
XI. Time to subsequent treatment for treatment failures in the form of whole gland therapy, focal therapy, systemic therapy or combinations thereof.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. Data gathered in this study may be used in future trials in focal treatment of localized prostate cancer with the preservation of all functional outcomes.
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1: Patients undergo HIFU once on study. Patients also undergo multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) during screening and follow-up, and biopsy of the prostate tissue and blood sample collection during follow-up.
ARM 2: Patients undergo transvesical single port robotic PP once on study. Patients also undergo mpMRI during screening and follow-up, and biopsy of the prostate tissue and blood sample collection during follow-up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 5 days, 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 9 months and at 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 years.
Trial PhaseNo phase specified
Trial Typetreatment
Lead OrganizationCase Comprehensive Cancer Center
Principal InvestigatorJihad Kaouk