This phase II trial compares the effect of standard-of-care (SOC) reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) with lower-dose or higher-dose total body irradiation (TBI) for the treatment of acute leukemia undergoing first allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (BMT). SOC RIC uses standard chemotherapy along with radiation before infusion of the cells from the transplant donor. A donor may be a relative or someone unrelated. Chemotherapy drugs, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink cancer. The radiation used prior to transplant, TBI, irradiates the entire body. Giving chemotherapy and TBI before a donor transplant helps kill cancer cells in the body and helps make room in the patient's bone marrow for new blood-forming cells (stem cells) to grow. This trial is being done to find out the optimal dose of TBI prior to allogeneic BMT. Using SOC RIC and the optimal dose of TBI may be safer, more tolerable and/or more effective in treating patients with acute leukemia undergoing first allogeneic BMT.
Additional locations may be listed on ClinicalTrials.gov for NCT06803745.
Locations matching your search criteria
United States
Maryland
Baltimore
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer CenterStatus: Active
Contact: Jonathan Allen Webster
Phone: 410-614-9106
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Compare graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) between patients in the two cohorts.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Compare overall survival (OS) between patients in the two cohorts.
II. Compare relapse-free survival (RFS) between patients in the two cohorts.
III. Compare relapse incidence (RI) between patients in the two cohorts.
IV. Compare non-relapse mortality (NRM) between patients in the two cohorts.
V. Compare the incidence of both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between patients in the two cohorts.
VI. Compare the incidence of graft failure between patients in the two cohorts.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Compare rates of grade ≥ 3 toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria.
II. Compare rates of grade ≥ 2 noninfective cystitis according to CTCAE criteria.
III. Compare maximal grade of fatigue according to CTCAE criteria.
IV. Compare rates in the development of new malignancies between patients in the two cohorts.
V. Compare time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1000/mm^3 and transfusion independence between patients in the two cohorts.
VI. Compare days of inpatient hospitalization from day -6 to day +56 between patients in the two cohorts.
VII. Compare the degree of T cell and total donor chimerism at different time points between groups.
VIII. Compare the level of markers of primary hypogonadism in women of menstruating age and men.
IX. Compare rates of intact fertility potential in women of menstruating age and men.
X. Compare patient-reported health outcomes in eight domains.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I:
SOC RIC: Patients receive chemotherapy per institutional SOC on study and undergo lower-dose TBI once on either day -3, -2 or -1.
ALLOGENEIC BMT: Patients receive an allogeneic BMT with T-cell replete peripheral blood stem cells or unmanipulated bone marrow per institutional practice intravenously (IV) once on day 0.
ARM II:
SOC RIC: Patients receive chemotherapy per institutional SOC on study and undergo higher-dose TBI once on either day -3, -2 or -1.
ALLOGENEIC BMT: Patients receive an allogeneic BMT with T-cell replete peripheral blood stem cells or unmanipulated bone marrow per institutional practice IV once on day 0.
Additionally, patients undergo echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) and computed tomography (CT) scan during screening. Patients undergo bone marrow biopsy and aspiration as well as blood sample collection throughout the trial. Patients may undergo biopsy during follow up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at days 28, 56, 90 and 180 and at year 1 and 2.
Lead OrganizationJohns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
Principal InvestigatorJonathan Allen Webster