This phase I trial tests the safety and effectiveness of pre-transplant thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine conditioning and de-escalated cyclophosphamide after allogeneic stem cell transplant in treating patients with leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative neoplasm. Thiotepa and busulfan are in a class of medications called alkylating agents. They interfere with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication and cell division, leading to cancer cell death and the inhibition of cell growth. Chemotherapy drugs, such as fludarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Cyclophosphamide is also an alkylating agent. It works by damaging the cell’s DNA and may kill cancer cells. It may also lower the body’s immune response. Thiotepa-based conditioning before, and de-escalated cyclophosphamide after, allogeneic stem cell transplant may be safe and effective in treating patients with leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative neoplasm.
Study sponsor and potential other locations can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov for NCT07565220.
Locations matching your search criteria
United States
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh
UPMC-Shadyside HospitalStatus: Active
Contact: Sawa Ito
Phone: 412-779-8616
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI)Status: Active
Contact: Sawa Ito
Phone: 412-779-8616
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the composite safety and efficacy of thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF) plus de-escalated post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched-donor allogeneic transplantation.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To further evaluate transplant-related toxicities associated with TBF + PTCy. (Safety)
II. To assess early indicators of efficacy for TBF + PTCy. (Efficacy)
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. To describe the kinetics of cellular immune reconstitution and graft versus host disease (GVHD) biomarkers.
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts based on patient age and comorbidities.
COHORT 1: Patients receive thiotepa intravenously (IV) on day -5, fludarabine IV on days -4 to -1, and busulfan IV on days -4 and -3 and then undergo peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant infusion on day 0. Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV on days +3 and +4, tacrolimus IV from day +5 to day +90-100, mycophenolate mofetil IV or orally (PO) from day +5 to day +35 and filgrastim from day +5 until engraftment. Patients may undergo echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) at screening and undergo bone marrow aspiration and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
COHORT 2: Patients receive thiotepa IV on days -6 and -5, fludarabine IV on days -4 to -1, and busulfan IV on days -4 and -3 and then undergo PBSC transplant infusion on day 0. Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV on days +3 and +4, tacrolimus IV from day +5 to day +90-100, mycophenolate mofetil IV or PO from day +5 to day +35 and filgrastim from day +5 until engraftment. Patients may undergo ECHO or MUGA at screening and undergo bone marrow aspiration and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at days 30, 100, 180, 365, and year 2.
Lead OrganizationUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI)
Principal InvestigatorSawa Ito