This was a two-arm, randomized, double-blind Phase III study of dabrafenib in combination
with trametinib versus two placebos in the adjuvant treatment of melanoma after surgical
resection. Patients with completely resected, histologically confirmed, BRAF V600E/K
mutation-positive, high-risk [Stage IIIa (lymph node metastasis >1 mm), IIIb or IIIc]
cutaneous melanoma were screened for eligibility. Subjects were randomized to receive
either dabrafenib (150 milligram (mg) twice daily [BID]) and trametinib (2 mg once daily
[QD]) combination therapy or two placebos for 12 months.
Additional locations may be listed on ClinicalTrials.gov for NCT01682083.
See trial information on ClinicalTrials.gov for a list of participating sites.
This was a two-arm, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, international phase III study
of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib versus two matching placebos in the adjuvant
treatment of melanoma after surgical resection. Patients with completely resected,
histologically confirmed, BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive, high-risk [Stage IIIa (lymph
node metastasis >1 mm), IIIb or IIIc] cutaneous melanoma were screened for eligibility.
Subjects were randomized to receive either dabrafenib (150 milligram (mg) twice daily
[BID]) and trametinib (2 mg once daily [QD]). None of the patients had undergone previous
systemic anticancer treatment or radiotherapy for melanoma. All the patients had
undergone completion lymphadenectomy with no clinical or radiographic evidence of
residual regional node disease within 12 weeks before randomization, had recovered from
definitive surgery, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0
or 1. BRAF V600 mutation status was confirmed in primary-tumor or lymph-node tissue by a
central reference laboratory. All the patients provided written informed consent.
The primary end point was recurrence-free survival, Overall survival, as the key
secondary end point, was to be tested in a hierarchical manner only if the primary end
point met the criteria for significance. The overall survival analysis used a preplanned
three-look Lan-DeMets group sequential design with an O'Brien-Fleming-type boundary,
which was used to determine the significance threshold for the first interim overall
survival analysis (two-sided P=0.000019).
Disease assessments included clinical examination and imaging by means of computed
tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or both.) Imaging was performed every 3 months
during the first 24 months, then every 6 months until disease recurrence or the
completion of the trial. Follow-up for survival began after recurrence and continued
through the end of the trial. Adverse events and laboratory values were assessed at
screening, on the date of randomization, at least once per month through month 12, and at
every visit for disease-recurrence assessment after month 12. Adverse events and
laboratory values were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse
Events, version 4.0.
Lead OrganizationNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation