This is a randomised, multicentre, controlled, open-label, Phase III global study
comparing the efficacy and safety of standard induction regimens (IsaVRd and DRd)
followed by AZD0120 versus standard induction regimens followed by continuous therapy
(IsaRd and DRd) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are
ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as initial therapy.
Study sponsor and potential other locations can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov for NCT07764978.
Locations matching your search criteria
United States
Texas
Houston
UT MD Anderson Cancer CenterStatus: Approved
Name Not Available
The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of IsaVRd or DRd induction
followed by a single administration of AZD0120 compared to IsaVRd or DRd induction
followed by continuous IsaRd or DRd in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) according
to IMWG 2016 criteria, and as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and
miminal residual disease (MRD) negative complete response (CR) rate at 9 months
post-randomisation in participants with NDMM who are ineligible to receive ASCT as
initial therapy.
Lead OrganizationAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Principal InvestigatorJennifer Brudno