Skip to main content

Tests to Detect Colorectal Cancer and Polyps

What is colorectal cancer?

Colorectal cancer is a disease in which abnormal cells in the colon or rectum divide uncontrollably, ultimately forming a malignant tumor. (The colon and rectum are parts of the body’s digestive system, which takes up nutrients from food and water and stores solid waste until it passes out of the body.)

Parts of the colon. Drawing of the front of the abdomen that shows the four sections of the colon: the ascending colon, the transverse colon, the descending colon, and the sigmoid colon. Also shown are the small intestine, the cecum, and the rectum. The cecum, colon, rectum, and anal canal make up the large intestine. The cecum, ascending colon, and transverse colon make up the upper, or proximal, colon; the descending colon and sigmoid colon make up the lower, or distal, colon.

Most colorectal cancers begin as a growth, or lesion, in the tissue that lines the inner surface of the colon or rectum. Lesions may appear as raised polyps, or, less commonly, they may appear flat or slightly indented. Raised polyps may be attached to the inner surface of the colon or rectum with a stalk (pedunculated polyps), or they may grow along the surface without a stalk (sessile polyps). 

Colorectal polyps are common in people older than 50 years of age, and most do not become cancer. However, a certain type of polyp known as an adenoma is more likely to become a cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of non-skin cancer in both men (after prostate cancer and lung cancer) and women (after breast cancer and lung cancer). It is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States after lung cancer. In 2020, an estimated 147,950 people in the United States will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 53,200 people will die from it (1). 

Who gets colorectal cancer?

In the United States, colorectal cancer is most common in adults aged 65 to 74. Rates of new colorectal cancer cases are decreasing among adults aged 50 years or older due to an increase in screening and to changes in some risk factors (for example, a decline in smoking) (1). However, incidence is increasing among younger adults (13), for reasons that are not known. 

An analysis of U.S. population-based cancer registry data from NCI’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program for 2000 to 2014 shows that, each year over this period, the incidence of colorectal cancer increased 2.7% among 20- to 39-year-olds and 1.7% among 40- to 49-year-olds while decreasing 0.5% among 50- to 59-year-olds, 3.3% among 60- to 69-year-olds, and 3.8% among 70- to 79-year-olds (4). 

Although the percentage increases were higher in the younger age groups than the older age groups, fewer colorectal cancers were still diagnosed in younger people than older people (for example, for 2000–2014, 22.5 colorectal cancers were diagnosed per 100,000 people ages 40–49 years, compared with 128.6 colorectal cancers diagnosed per 100,000 people ages 60–69 years).

The major risk factors for colorectal cancer are older age and having certain inherited conditions (such as Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis), but several other factors have been associated with increased risk, including a family history of the disease, excessive alcohol use, obesity, being physically inactive, cigarette smoking, and, possibly, diet.

In addition, people with a history of inflammatory bowel disease (such as ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease) have a higher risk of colorectal cancer than people without such conditions.  
 

What methods are used to screen people for colorectal cancer?

Several screening tests have been developed to help doctors find colorectal cancer before symptoms begin, when it may be more treatable. Some tests that detect adenomas and polyps can prevent the development of cancer because these tests allow growths that might otherwise become cancer to be detected and removed. That is, colorectal cancer screening may be a form of cancer prevention in addition to early detection.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) considers the following methods to be acceptable screening tests for colorectal cancer:   

  • Stool tests. Both polyps and colorectal cancers can bleed, and stool tests check for tiny amounts of blood in feces (stool) that cannot be seen visually. (Blood in stool may also indicate the presence of conditions that are not cancer, such as hemorrhoids.) 

    Currently, three types of stool tests are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to screen for colorectal cancer: guaiac FOBT (gFOBT); the fecal immunochemical (or immunohistochemical) test (FIT, also known as iFOBT); and
    multitargeted stool DNA testing (also known as FIT-DNA). With these tests, stool samples are collected by the patient using a kit, and the samples are returned to the doctor. People who have a positive finding with these tests are advised to have a colonoscopy.
     
    • Guaiac FOBT uses a chemical to detect heme, a component of the blood protein hemoglobin. Because the guaiac FOBT can also detect heme in some foods (for example, red meat), people must avoid certain foods before having this test.
    • FIT uses antibodies to detect hemoglobin protein specifically (4, 5). Dietary restrictions are typically not required for FIT.
    • FIT-DNA detects hemoglobin, along with certain DNA biomarkers. The DNA comes from cells in the lining of the colon and rectum that are shed and collect in stool as it passes through the large intestine and rectum. 
       
    Randomized trials have shown that gFOBT, when performed every 1 to 2 years in people aged 50 to 80 years, can help reduce the number of deaths due to colorectal cancer (6, 7). Newer studies have shown that FIT can detect more colorectal cancers than gFOBT (that is, it is more sensitive) (8). If gFOBT or FIT is the only type of colorectal cancer screening test performed, experts generally recommend testing every year or two (9). 

    In one study of people who were at average risk of developing colon cancer and had no symptoms of colon problems (10), the FIT-DNA test was more sensitive than the FIT test. However, the FIT-DNA test also was more likely to identify an abnormality when none was actually present (that is, it had more false-positive results, which can lead to unnecessary colonoscopies). Experts generally suggest FIT-DNA testing at least every 3 years (5).
     
  • Sigmoidoscopy. In this test, the rectum and sigmoid colon are examined using a sigmoidoscope, a flexible lighted tube with a lens for viewing and a tool for removing tissue. This instrument is inserted through the anus into the rectum and sigmoid colon as air is pumped into the colon to expand it so the doctor can see the colon lining more clearly. During sigmoidoscopy, abnormal growths in the rectum and sigmoid colon can be removed for analysis (biopsied). The lower colon must be cleared of stool before sigmoidoscopy, but the preparation is not very extensive. People are usually not sedated for this test.

    Clinical trials have shown that having  sigmoidoscopy lowers the risks of developing and dying from colorectal cancer (1115). Experts generally recommend sigmoidoscopy every 5 or 10 years for people at average risk who have had a negative test result (9). People who are screened with sigmoidoscopy may also be tested every few years with FIT. 
     
  • Colonoscopy. In this test, the rectum and entire colon are examined using a colonoscope, a flexible lighted tube with a lens for viewing and a tool for removing tissue. Like the shorter sigmoidoscope, the colonoscope is inserted through the anus into the rectum and the colon as air is pumped into the colon to expand it so the doctor can see the colon lining more clearly. During colonoscopy, any abnormal growths in the entire colon and the rectum can be removed. A thorough cleansing of the entire colon is necessary before this test. Most patients receive some form of sedation during the test.

    A meta-analysis of six observational studies reported that screening with colonoscopy substantially reduces the risks of developing and dying from colorectal cancer (16). Experts recommend colonoscopy every 10 years for people at average risk as long as their test results are negative. 

    Virtual colonoscopy, also called computed tomographic (CT) colonography, is a screening method that uses special x-ray equipment (a CT scanner) to produce a series of pictures of the colon and the rectum from outside the body. A computer then assembles these pictures into detailed images that can show polyps and other abnormalities. As with standard colonoscopy, a thorough cleansing of the colon is necessary before this test. If polyps or other abnormal growths are found during a virtual colonoscopy, a standard colonoscopy must usually be performed to remove them. 

    Because virtual colonoscopy also produces images of areas outside the colon and rectum it can lead to the unintentional discovery of medical findings in these areas that require additional follow up procedures. Virtual colonoscopy may also miss small polyps (17). However, many small polyps may not be likely to become cancer and so taking them out may not be of benefit.
     
  • Other methods. Several other tests to screen for colorectal cancer exist, although these are not generally recommended. 

    Blood-based DNA test (liquid biopsy). A blood test for an altered gene called SEPT9 is FDA approved to be used to screen adults 50 years or older at average risk for colorectal cancer who have been offered and have a history of not completing colorectal cancer screening. There is no evidence yet that this test can reduce deaths from colorectal cancer.

    Double-contrast barium enema (DCBE). This test is another method of visualizing the colon from outside the body. In DCBE, a series of x-ray images of the entire colon and rectum is taken after the patient is given an enema with a barium solution. The barium helps to outline the colon and the rectum on the images. DCBE is rarely used for colorectal cancer screening; however, it may be used for people who cannot undergo standard colonoscopy—for example, because they are at particular risk for complications.

    Single-specimen guaiac FOBT done in a doctor's office. Doctors sometimes perform a single-specimen guaiac FOBT on a stool sample collected during a digital rectal examination as part of a routine physical examination. However, this approach has not been shown to be an effective way to screen for colorectal cancer (18).

Who should have colorectal cancer screening?

Expert medical groups, including the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF; 5), strongly recommend screening for colorectal cancer. Although some details of the recommendations vary, most groups generally recommend that people at average risk of colorectal cancer get screened at regular intervals beginning at age 50 years (5, 9), although the American Cancer Society recommends that routine screening begin at age 45 (19). USPSTF recommends that screening continue to age 75 years; for those aged 75 to 85 years, the decision to screen is based on the patient’s life expectancy, health status, comorbid conditions, and prior screening results. 

People who are at increased risk of colorectal cancer because of a family history of colorectal cancer or documented advanced polyps or because they have inflammatory bowel disease or certain inherited conditions (such as Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis) may be advised to start screening earlier and/or have more frequent screening. 

How can people and their health care providers decide which colorectal cancer screening test(s) to use? 

It is important to have colorectal cancer screening. Different tests have different advantages and disadvantages, and people should talk with their health care provider about which test is best for them.

The decision about which test to have usually takes into account several factors, including:

  • the person’s age, medical history, family history, and general health
  • potential harms of the test
  • the preparation required for the test
  • whether sedation may be needed for the test
  • the follow-up care needed after the test
  • the convenience of the test
  • the cost of the test and the availability of insurance coverage

The table below summarizes key features of the different colorectal screening tests that people may want to consider when choosing a test.  

Test Diet and medication changes before test? Invasive procedure? Preparation (colon cleansing) needed? Sedation needed? Test frequency Additional considerations
Stool tests Yes for gFOBT, no for FIT or FIT-DNA No No No Every year to every 3 years, depending on the test
  • Follow-up colonoscopy will likely be needed if test is positive
Sigmoidoscopy Yes Yes Yes (less extensive than for colonoscopy) Usually no Every 5-10 years, possibly with more frequent FIT
  • Abnormal tissue can be removed during exam
  • Very small risk of tearing or perforation of the lining of the colon
  • Not widely available in United States (20)
Colonoscopy Yes Yes Yes Yes Every 10 years
  • Abnormal tissue can be removed during exam
  • Small risk of tearing or perforation of the lining of the colon
Virtual colonoscopy No No Yes No Every 5 years
  • Follow-up colonoscopy will likely be needed if test is positive
  • Not widely available and may not be covered by insurance
  • Can find abnormalities outside the colon that may need follow up
  • Involves exposure to small amount of radiation    

Does health insurance pay for colorectal cancer screening?

Colorectal cancer screening is a preventive service that the Health Insurance Marketplace and many other health plans are required to cover. Medicare covers several colorectal cancer screening tests for its beneficiaries. However, Medicare and some insurance companies currently do not pay for the costs of virtual colonoscopy. Specific information about Medicare benefits for colorectal cancer screening is available on the Medicare website.

A colonoscopy to follow up on a screening test with a positive result, such as an abnormal stool test or even a lesion detected on a screening colonoscopy, is considered to be a diagnostic exam and may not be covered (or not covered as fully as a screening colonoscopy). Some insurers consider a screening colonoscopy that reveals a polyp that must be removed to be a diagnostic exam and charge accordingly. People should check with their health insurance provider to determine their colorectal cancer screening coverage and what their out-of-pocket expenses may be if the test finds an abnormality that needs to be followed up.

What happens if a colorectal cancer screening test finds an abnormality?

If a screening test finds an abnormality (a lesion or tumor), additional tests may be needed. These tests most often include a colonoscopy if it has not already been done, such as in the case of stool blood testing. If an abnormality is found during a sigmoidoscopy, a biopsy or polypectomy may be performed during the test, and a follow-up colonoscopy may be recommended. If an abnormality is found during a standard colonoscopy, a biopsy or polypectomy may be performed during the test to determine whether cancer is present. If an abnormality is detected during virtual colonoscopy, the patient will be referred for a standard colonoscopy.

What new tests are being developed for colorectal cancer screening?

Among new approaches to colorectal cancer screening that are being explored are ways to improve visualization of the colon. One technique is capsule colonoscopy (also called capsule endoscopy), in which a person swallows a pill-like capsule that contains a tiny wireless camera. The camera takes pictures of the inside of the digestive tract and sends them to a small recorder that is worn on the patient’s waist or shoulder. The pictures are then viewed on a computer by the doctor to check for signs of disease. The capsule passes out of the body during a bowel movement. Cleansing of the colon is still necessary before this test. This method is currently approved for patients with an incomplete colonoscopy and for detection of colon polyps in patients with evidence of lower GI bleeding but not as a stand-alone screening test. 

One new approach to colorectal cancer screening is to look for cells released by colorectal polyps and tumors into the bloodstream (21). These so-called circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are rare, however. Researchers have developed an ultrasensitive antibody-linked CTC detection technology to capture colorectal epithelial cells associated with colorectal tumors and adenomas in blood samples (22). In a proof-of-concept study, this blood-based CTC test was able to distinguish between patients with colorectal adenomas or cancer and healthy individuals (23).

Researchers have also identified small molecules, called metabolites, in urine that may signal the presence of colorectal polyps and tumors (24, 25). In a clinical study, a metabolomic-based urine test was better able to identify patients with adenomas than stool-based tests (26).

Information about ongoing clinical trials that are studying methods for colorectal cancer screening can be found in NCI’s clinical trials database. You may also contact NCI’s Cancer Information Service at 1–800–4–CANCER (1–800–422–6237) for assistance with searching the clinical trials database.

Selected References
  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA: A  Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2020 Mar 5. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  2. Kehm RD, Yang W, Tehranifar P, Terry MB. 40 years of change in age- and stage-specific cancer incidence rates in US women and men. JNCI Cancer Spectrum 2019; 3(3):pkz038. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz038.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  3. Virostko J, Capasso A, Yankeelov TE, Goodgame B. Recent trends in the age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer in the US National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2015. Cancer 2019; 125(21):3828-3835.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  4. Ansa BE, Coughlin SS, Alema-Mensah E, Smith SA. Evaluation of colorectal cancer incidence trends in the United States (2000-2014). Journal of Clinical Medicine 2018; 7(2). pii: E22. doi: 10.3390/jcm7020022.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  5. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2016; 315(23):2564-75.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  6. Burch JA, Soares-Weiser K, St John DJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of faecal occult blood tests used in screening for colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Screening 2007; 14(3):132-137.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  7. Ouyang DL, Chen JJ, Getzenberg RH, Schoen RE. Noninvasive testing for colorectal cancer: A review. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2005; 100(6):1393-1403.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  8. Shapiro JA, Bobo JK, Church TR, et al. A comparison of fecal immunochemical and high-sensitivity guaiac tests for colorectal cancer Screening. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2017; 112(11):1728-1735.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  9. Qaseem A, Crandall CJ, Mustafa RA, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic average-risk adults: A Guidance Statement from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine 2019; 171(9):643-654.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  10. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. New England Journal of Medicine 2004; 351(26):2704-2714.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  11. Elmunzer BJ, Hayward RA, Schoenfeld PS, et al. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Medicine 2012; 9(12):e1001352.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  12. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 366(25):2345-2357.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  13. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375(9726):1624-1633.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  14. Holme Ø, Løberg M, Kalager M, et al. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312(6):606-615.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  15. Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2011; 103(17):1310-1322.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  16. Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. British Medical Journal 2014; 348:g2467.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  17. Pickhardt PJ. Missed lesions at CT colonography: lessons learned. Abdominal Imaging 2013; 38(1):82-97.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  18. Collins JF, Lieberman DA, Durbin TE, Weiss DG; Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #380 Group. Accuracy of screening for fecal occult blood on a single stool sample obtained by digital rectal examination: A comparison with recommended sampling practice. Annals of Internal Medicine 2005; 142(2):81-85.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  19. Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2018; 68(4):250-281.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  20. Zapka J, Klabunde CN, Taplin S, et al. Screening colonoscopy in the US: Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2012; 27(9):1150-1158.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  21. Mead R, Duku M, Bhandari P, Cree IA. Circulating tumour markers can define patients with normal colons, benign polyps, and cancers. British Journal of Cancer 2011; 105(2):239-245.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  22. Wu JC, Tseng PY, Tsai WS, et al. Antibody conjugated supported lipid bilayer for capturing and purification of viable tumor cells in blood for subsequent cell culture. Biomaterials 2013; 34(21):5191-5199.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  23. Tsai WS, You JF, Hung HY, et al. Novel circulating tumor cell assay for detection of colorectal adenomas and cancer. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology 2019; 10(10):e00088.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  24. Deng L, Fang H, Tso VK, et al. Clinical validation of a novel urine-based metabolomic test for the detection of colonic polyps on Chinese population. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2017; 32(5):741-743.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  25. Deng L, Ismond K, Liu Z, et al. Urinary metabolomics to identify a unique biomarker panel for detecting colorectal cancer: A multicenter study. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2019; 28(8):1283-1291.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  26. Wang H, Tso V, Wong C, Sadowski D, Fedorak RN. Development and validation of a highly sensitive urine-based test to identify patients with colonic adenomatous polyps. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology 2014; 5(3):e54.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  • Reviewed:

If you would like to reproduce some or all of this content, see Reuse of NCI Information for guidance about copyright and permissions. In the case of permitted digital reproduction, please credit the National Cancer Institute as the source and link to the original NCI product using the original product's title; e.g., “Tests to Detect Colorectal Cancer and Polyps was originally published by the National Cancer Institute.”